Action video games do not improve the speed of information processing in simple perceptual tasks

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 143, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1794-1805

  van Ravenzwaaij, Don ^a   Boekel, Wouter ^b   Forstmann, Birte U ^b   Ratcliff, Roger ^c   Wagenmakers, Eric Jan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action games; Diffusion model; Moving dots task; Probabilistic inference

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VIDEO GAME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VIDEO GAMES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907691748     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0036923     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ball, K., & Sekuler, R. (1982, November 12). A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. Science, 218, 697-698.
2. Beck, J. M., Ma, W. J., Kiani, R., Hanks, T., Churchland, A. K., Roitman, J. D.,. Pouget, A. (2008). Probabilistic population codes for Bayesian decision making. Neuron, 60, 1142-1152.
3. Berger, J. O. (2006). Bayes factors. In S. Kotz, N. Balakrishnan, C. Read, B. Vidakovic, & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 378-386). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
4. Boot, W. R., Blakely, D. P., & Simons, D. J. (2011). Do action video games improve perception and cognition? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-6.
5. Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., Simons, D. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2008). The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychologica, 129, 387-398.
6. Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T., & Movshon, J. A. (1992). The analysis of visual motion: A comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 4745-4765.
7. Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49, 609-610.
8. Clark, J. E., Lanphear, A. K., & Riddick, C. C. (1987). The effects of videogame playing on the response selection processing of elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 82-85.
9. Drew, D., & Waters, J. (1986). Video games: Utilization of a novel strategy to improve perceptual motor skills and cognitive functioning in the non-institutionalized elderly. Cognitive Rehabilitation, 4, 26 - 31.
10. Dutilh, G., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2009). A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1026-1036.
11. Fahle, M. (2005). Perceptual learning: Specificity versus generalization. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 154-160.
12. Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850-855.
13. Geddes, J., Ratcliff, R., Allerhand, M., Childers, R., Wright, R. J., Frier, B. M., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Modeling the effects of hypoglycemia on a two-choice task in adult humans. Neuropsychology, 24, 652- 660.
14. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003, May 29). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534-537.
15. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2006). Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: The case of action video game players. Cognition, 101, 217- 245.
16. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2012). Learning, attentional control, and action video games. Current Biology, 22, R197-R206.
17. Green, C. S., Pouget, A., & Bavelier, D. (2010). Improved probabilistic inference as a general learning mechanism with action video games. Current Biology, 20, 1573-1579.
18. Hoijtink, H., Klugkist, I., & Boelen, P. (2008). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses that are of practical value for social scientists. New York, NY: Springer.
19. Irons, J. L., Remington, R. W., & McLean, J. P. (2011). Not so fast: Rethinking the effects of action video games on attentional capacity. Australian Journal of Psychology, 63, 224-231.
20. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
21. Jeter, P. E., Dosher, B. A., Petrov, A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2009). Task precision at transfer determines specificity of perceptual learning. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-13.
22. Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795.
23. Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., & Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Process components of the implicit association test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353-368.
24. Li, R., Polat, U., Makous, W., & Bavelier, D. (2009). Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through action video game training. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 549-551.
25. Liu, Z., & Weinshall, D. (2000). Mechanisms of generalization in perceptual learning. Vision Research, 40, 97-109.
26. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679-690.
28. Mulder, M. J., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R., Boekel, W., & Forstmann, B. U. (2012). Bias in the brain: A diffusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payoff. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 2335- 2343.
29. Murphy, K., & Spencer, A. (2009). Playing video games does not make for better visual attention skills. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 6, 1-20.
30. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Newsome, W. T., & Paré, E. B. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 2201-2211.
32. Palmer, J., Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005). The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. Journal of Vision, 5, 376-404.
33. Philiastides, M. G., Ratcliff, R., & Sajda, P. (2006). Neural representation of task difficulty and decision-making during perceptual categorization: A timing diagram. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8965- 8975.
34. Powers, K. L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., Palladino, M. A., & Alfieri, L. (2013). Effects of video-game play on information processing: A metaanalytic investigation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1055-1079. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0418-z
35. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
36. Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). Diffusion model account of lexical decision. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182.
37. Ratcliff, R., Hasegawa, Y. T., Hasegawa, Y. P., Smith, P. L., & Segraves, M. A. (2007). Dual diffusion model for single-cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness-discrimination task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 1756-1774.
38. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873- 922.
39. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2006). Aging, practice, and perceptual tasks: A diffusion model analysis. Psychology and Aging, 21, 353-371.
40. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2010). Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 127- 157.
41. Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438-481.
42. Ratcliff, R., & van Dongen, H. P. A. (2009). Sleep deprivation affects multiple distinct cognitive processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 742-751.
43. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237.
44. Schlickum, M. K., Hedman, L., Enochsson, L., Kjellin, A., & Felländer-Tsai, L. (2009). Systematic video game training in surgical novices improves performance in virtual reality endoscopic surgical simulators: A prospective randomized study. World Journal of Surgery, 33, 2360-2367.
45. Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2007). Fitting the Ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1011-1026.
46. van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Oberauer, K. (2009). How to use the diffusion model: Parameter recovery of three methods: EZ, fast-dm, and DMAT. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 463-473.
47. van Ravenzwaaij, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Does the Name-Race Implicit Association Test measure racial prejudice? Experimental Psychology, 58, 271-277.
48. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779-804.
49. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 641-671.
50. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 140-159.
51. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 627-633.
52. White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M. W., & McKoon, G. (2010). Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 39-52.
53. Wolfe, J. M. (2013). Registered reports and replications in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 781-783.