Classifying railway stations for strategic transport and land use planning: Context matters!

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 670-679

  Zemp, Stefan ^a   Stauffacher, Michael ^a   Lang, Daniel J ^a,b   Scholz, Roland W ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Classification; Comparability; Context; Environment; Functional requirements; Railway station

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; LAND USE PLANNING; POLICY STRATEGY; RAILWAY TRANSPORT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

SWITZERLAND;

EID: 79957494296     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Balz V., Schrijnen J. From concept to projects: Stedenbaan, The Netherlands. Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen 2009, 75-90. Ashgate, Farnham. C. Curtis, J.L. Renne, L. Bertolini (Eds.).
2. Bertolini L. Nodes and places: complexities of railway station redevelopment. European Planning Studies 1996, 4(3):331-345.
3. Bertolini L. Spatial development patterns and public transport: the application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Planning Practice and Research 1999, 14(2):199-210.
4. Bertolini L., Spit T. Cities on Rails: The Redevelopment of Station Areas 1998, Spon, London, New York.
5. Bossel H. Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Application - A Report to the Balaton Group 1999, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
6. Bossel H. Policy assessment and simulation of actor orientation for sustainable development. Ecological Economics 2000, 35(3):337-355.
7. Bosshard A. What does objectivity mean for analysis, valuation and implementation in agricultural landscape planning? A practical and epistemological approach to the search for sustainability in 'agri-culture'. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 1997, 63(2-3):133-143.
8. Brons M., Rietveld P. Improving the quality of the door-to-door rail journey: a customer-oriented approach. Built Environment 2009, 35(1):122-135.
9. Railway Development: Impacts on Urban Dynamics 2008, Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg. F. Bruinsma, E. Pels, H. Priemus, P. Rietveld, B. Van Wee (Eds.).
10. Calthorpe P. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community and the American Dream 1993, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
11. Checkland P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice 2001, Wiley, Chichester.
12. Chen C., Chen J., Barry J. Diurnal pattern of transit ridership: a case study of the New York City subway system. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17(3):176-186.
13. Connolly K., Payne M. Bay area rapid transit's comprehensive station plans: integrating capacity, access, and land use planning at rail transit stations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2004, 1872(1):1-9.
14. Curtis C. Evolution of the transit-oriented development model for low-density cities: a case study of Perth's new railway corridor. Planning Practice and Research 2008, 23(3):285-302.
15. Dallen J. The challenges of diverse visitor perceptions: rail policy and sustainable transport at the resort destination. Journal of Transport Geography 2007, 15(2):104-115.
16. DB Station&Service AG, 2009a. Allgemeine Bedingungen für die Nutzung der Infrastruktur von Personenbahnhöfen der DB Station&Service AG (ABP).
17. DB Station&Service AG, 2009b. Die Sechs Bahnhofskategorien. DB Station&Service.
18. De Tommasi, R., Oetterli, D., Müller, G., 2004. Standards für Intermodale Schnittstellen Forschungsprojekt SVI 2001/525 Zürich.
19. Diener R., Herzog J., Meili M., de Meuron P., Schmid C. Die Schweiz-ein Städtebauliches Portrait 2005, Birkhäuser, Basel.
20. Everitt B.S., Landau S., Leese M. Cluster Analysis 2001, Arnold, London.
21. GCLP A.A.G. Global Change and Local Places. Estimating, Understanding and Reducing Greenhouse Gases. Association of American Geographers Global Change and Local Places Research Team, Cambridge 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Green C., Hall P. Better Rail Stations 2009, Department for Transport, London.
23. Haywood R. Co-ordinating urban development, stations and railway services as a component of urban sustainability: an achievable planning goal in Britain?. Planning Theory and Practice 2005, 6(1):71-97.
24. Hickman R., Hall P. Moving the city east: explorations into contextual public transport-orientated development. Planning Practice and Research 2008, 23(3):323-339.
25. Hirsch Hadorn G., Bradley D., Pohl C., Rist S., Wiesmann U. Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics 2006, 60(1):119-128.
26. Kunda Z. Social Cognition Making Sense of People 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
27. Lang D.J., Scholz R.W., Binder C.R., Wiek A., Stäubli B. Sustainability potential analysis (SPA) of landfills - a systemic approach: theoretical considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production 2007, 15(17):1628-1638.
28. Levinson D. Density and dispersion: the co-development of land use and rail in London. Journal of Economic Geography 2008, 8(1):55-77.
29. Li W., Cai X. Empirical analysis of a scale-free railway network in China. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 2007, 382(2):693-703.
30. Meadows D.H., Wright D. Thinking in Systems: A Primer 2008, Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junciton, Vermont.
31. Merton R.K. Social Theory and Social Structure: Revised and Enlarged Edition 1967, The Free Press, New York.
32. Miller J.G. Living Systems 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York.
33. Peek G.-J., Louw E. Integrated rail and land use investment as a multi-disciplinary challenge. Planning Practice and Research 2008, 23(3):341-361.
34. Peek G.-J., Bertolini L., De Jonge H. Gaining insight in the development potential of station areas: a decade of node-place modelling in The Netherlands. Planning Practice and Research 2006, 21(4):443-462.
35. Reusser D.E., Loukopoulos P., Stauffacher M., Scholz R.W. Classifying railway stations for sustainable transitions - balancing node and place functions. Journal of Transport Geography 2008, 16(3):191-202.
36. Railway Stations: Planning, Design and Management 2000, Architectural Press, Oxford, Aukland, Boston, Johannesburg, Melbourne, New Delhi. J. Ross (Ed.).
37. Scholz R.W. Mutual learning as a basic principle of transdisciplinarity. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem-solving among Science, Technology and Society. Proceedings of the International Transdisciplinarity 2000 Conference, Zurich. Workbook II: Mutual Learning Sessions 2000, 13-17. Haffmans Sachbuch, Zürich. R.W. Scholz, R. Häberli, A. Bill, M. Welti (Eds.).
38. Scholz R.W., Stauffacher M. Managing transition in clusters: area development negotiations as a tool for sustaining traditional industries in a Swiss prealpine region. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(10):2518-2539.
39. Scholz R.W., Tietje O. Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi.
40. Stauffacher M., Scholz R.W., Lezzi M. Bahnhöfe als Schlüssel Nachhaltiger Mobilität und Stadtentwicklung-Entwicklungsperspektiven für die Stadt Basel und TAB. Nachhaltige Bahnhofs- und Stadtentwicklung in der Trinationalen Agglomeration: Bahnhöfe in der Stadt Basel. ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2004 2005, 17-57. Verlag Rüegger, Zürich. R.W. Scholz, M. Stauffacher, S. Bösch, P. Krütli (Eds.).
41. Stauffacher M., Flüeler T., Krütli P., Scholz R.W. Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: A transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss prealpine region. Systemic Practice and Action Research 2008, 21(6):409-422.
42. Straatemeier, T., Bertolini, L., Te Brömmelstroet, M., Hoetjes, P., 2010. An experiential approach to research in planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design Advance.
43. Thompson K., Schofield P. An investigation of the relationship between public transport performance and destination satisfaction. Journal of Transport Geography 2007, 15(2):136-144.
44. Tukey J.W. Exploratory Data Analysis 1977, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, Mass.
45. Verhetsel A., Vanelslander T. What location policy can bring to sustainable commuting: an empirical study in Brussels and Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(6):691-701.
46. Ward J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1963, 58(301):236-244.
47. Webb A.R. Statistical Pattern Recognition 2005, Wiley, Chichester.
48. Wegener, M., Fürst, F., 1999. Land-use Transport Interaction: State of the Art. TRANSLAND. Integration of Transport and Land Use Planning. Work Package 2, Deliverable D2a. Dortmund.
49. Wolff R. Popular Planning in King's Cross, London. Kommunikative Vernunft im Stadtentwicklungsprozess 1999, ETH Zurich, Zurich.
50. Wucherpfennig C. Bahnhof - (stadt)gesellschaftlicher Mikrokosmos im Wandel. Eine "neue kulturgeographische" Analyse 2006, BIS-Verlag Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany.
51. Wulfhorst G. Flächennutzung und Verkehrsverknüpfung an Personenbahnhöfen - Wirkungsabschätzung mit systemdynamischen Modellen. Institut für Stadtbauwesen und Stadtverkehr ISB 2003, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
52. Zemp, S., Stauffacher, M., Lang, D.J., Scholz, R.W., in press. Generic functions of railway stations - a conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria. Transport Policy.