Residential location and transit-oriented development in a new rail corridor

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 219-237

  Olaru, Doina ^a   Smith, Brett ^a   Taplin, John H E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Discrete choice models; Latent classes; Latent variables; Relocation decision; Transit oriented development

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HOUSING; LAND USE; URBAN GROWTH;

ARTIFICIAL ENVIRONMENTS; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; LAND USE AND TRANSPORTS; LATENT CLASS; LATENT VARIABLE; PERTH , WESTERN AUSTRALIA; SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

DECISION MAKING; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; RAILWAY TRANSPORT; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN TRANSPORT;

AUSTRALIA; PERTH [WESTERN AUSTRALIA]; WESTERN AUSTRALIA;

EID: 79251614364     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006). Census Data. http://www.abs.gov.au/CDataOnline.
2. Ashok K., Dillon W.R., Yuan S. Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research 2002, 39:31-46.
3. Barton H., Grant M., Guise R. Shaping Neighbourhoods: A Guide for Health, Sustainability and Vitality 2003, Spon Press, London.
4. Barrow L. School choice through relocation: evidence from the Washington, DC area. Journal of Public Economics 2002, 86(2):155-189.
5. Ben-Akiva M., McFadden D., Gärling T., Gopinath D., Walker J., Bolduc D., Börch-Supan A., Delquié P., Larichev O., Morikawa T., Polydoropoulos A., Rao V. Extended framework for modelling choice behaviour. Marketing Letters 1999, 10(3):187-203.
6. Bhat C.R., Poszgay Destination choice modeling for home-based recreational trips: analysis and implications for land-use, transportation, and air quality planning. Transportation Research Record 2002, 1777:47-54.
7. Bhat C.R., Guo J.Y. A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transportation Research Part B 2007, 41(5):506-526.
8. Bliemer M.C.J., Rose J.M., Hensher D.A. Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models. Transportation Research Part B 2009, 43:19-35.
9. Bolduc D., Boucher N., Alvarez-Daziano R. Hybrid choice modelling of new technologies for car choice in Canada. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2082:63-71.
10. Calthorpe P., Fulton W. The Regional City: Planning for the End of Sprawl 2001, Island Press, Washington, DC.
11. Cao X., Handy S.L., Mokhtarian P.L. The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behaviour: evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation 2006, 33:1-20.
12. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation 2007, 34(5):535-556.
13. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews 2009, 29:359-395.
14. Cervero R. Efficient urbanisation: economic performance and the shape of the metropolis. Urban Studies 2001, 38(10):1651-1671.
15. Cervero R., Duncan M. Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from San Francisco Bay Area. American Journal of Public Health 2003, 93(9):1478-1483.
16. Cervero, R., Murphy, S., Ferrel, C., Goguts, N., Tsai, Y., Arrington, G.B., Boroski, J., Smith-Heimer, J., Golem, R., Peninger, P., Nakajima, E., Chui, E., Dunphy, R., Myers, M., McKay, S., Witenstein, N., 2004. Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects, Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 102. Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press, Washington.
17. Cervero, R., 2005. Transit-Oriented Development in America: Strategies, Issues, Policy Directions, Transit Oriented Development-Making it Happen Conference, Fremantle, Australia, 5-8 July.
18. Chang, Yu Travel and activity choices based on an individual accessibility model. Papers of Regional Science 2004, 83(2):387-406.
19. Chen C., McKnight C.E. Does the built environment make a difference? Additional evidence from the daily activity and travel behavior of homemakers living in New York City and suburbs. Journal of Transport Geography 2007, 15(5):380-395.
20. Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P., Handy, S., 2008. Land Use, Attitudes, and Travel Behaviour Relationships: A Cross-Sectional Structural Equations Model for Northern California. Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC (January).
21. Clark W.A.V., Onaka J.L. Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations for residential mobility. Urban Studies 1983, 20:47-57.
22. Curtis, C., Olaru, D., 2007. Travel 'minimisation' and the neighbourhood. In: European Transport Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 17-19 October.
23. Des Rosiers F., Thériault M., Villeneuve P.-Y. Sorting out access and neighbourhood factors in hedonic price modelling. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment 2000, 18:291-315.
24. Evans IV, J.E., Pratt, R.H., Stryker, A., Kuzmyak, J.R., 2007. Transit Oriented Development - Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 95. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC (Chapter 17).
25. Ewing R., Bartholomew K., Winkelman S., Walters J., Chen D. Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change 2008, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC.
26. Gordon P., Kumar A., Richardson H.W. The influence of metropolitan spatial structure on commuting time. Journal of Urban Economics 1989, 26(2):138-151.
27. Handy S.L., Boarnet M.G., Ewing R., Killingsworth R.E. How the built environment affects physical activity. Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2002, 23(2):64-73.
28. Hansen E.B., Gottschalk G. What makes older people consider moving house and what makes them move?. Housing, Theory, and Society 2006, 23(1):34-54.
29. Huber J., Zwerina K. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 1996, 33:307-317.
30. Hui E.C.M., Chau C.K., Pun L., Law M.Y. Measuring the neighboring and environmental effects on residential property value: using spatial weighting matrix. Building and Environment 2007, 42:2333-2343.
31. Khattak A.J., Rodriguez D. Travel behaviour in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: a case study in USA. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39(6):481-500.
32. Kim S., Ulfarsson G.F., Hennessy J.T. Analysis of light rail rider travel behavior: impacts of individual, built environment and crime characteristics on transit access. Transportation Research Part A 2007, 41(6):511-522.
33. Kitamura R., Fujii S., Pas E. Time-use data, analysis and modeling: toward the next generation of transportation planning methodologies. Transport Policy 1997, 4:225-235.
34. Loukaitou-Sideris A. Is it safe to walk? Neighborhood safety and security considerations and their effects on walking. Journal of Planning Literature 2002, 20:219-231.
35. Meurs H., Haaijer R. Spatial structure and mobility. Transportation Research Part D 2001, 6(6):429-446.
36. Mokhtarian P.L., Cao X. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42:204-228.
37. Morikawa T., Ben-Akiva M., McFadden D. Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data. Econometric Models in Marketing 2002, 16:27-53.
38. Næss P. Residential location affects travel behaviour - but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Progress in Planning 2005, 63(3):167-257.
39. Newman P., Kenworthy J. Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis 2006, 2(1):35-52. .
40. O'Sullivan S., Morrall J. Walking distances to and from light-rail transit stations. Transportation Research Record 1996, 1538(1):19-26.
41. Pinjari A.R., Bhat C.R., Hensher D.A. Residential self-selection effects in an activity time-use behavior model. Transportation Research Part B 2009, 43:729-748.
42. Prashker J., Shiftan Y., Hershkovitch-Sarusi P. Residential choice location, gender and the commute trip to work in Tel Aviv. Journal of Transport Geography 2008, 16:332-341.
43. Real Estate Institute of WA, 2006-2008. Price Growth By Suburb. http://reiwa.com/res/res-pricegrowth-display.cfm.
44. Renne J., Wells J. Transit-Oriented Development: Developing a Strategy to Measure Success. NCHRP Research Results Digest 2005, vol. 294. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
45. Renne J. From transit-adjacent to transit-oriented development. Local Environment 2009, 14(1):1-15.
46. Rose J., Bliemer M. Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs. Transport Reviews 2009, 29(5):587-617.
47. Rossi P.H. Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility 1955, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.
48. Salomon I., Mokhtarian P.L. What happens when mobility inclined market segments face accessibility-enhanced policies?. Transportation Research Part A 1998, 3(3):129-140.
49. Sándor Z., Wedel M. Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Science 2002, 21(4):455-475.
50. Scheiner J. Housing mobility and travel behaviour: a process-oriented approach to spatial mobility. Evidence from a new research field in Germany. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14(4):287-298.
51. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods?. Journal of Transport Geography 2005, 13(1):83-99.
52. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance travelled. Transportation Research Part D 2005, 10(2):127-151.
53. Sermons M.W., Koppelman F.S. A factor analytic approach to incorporating systematic taste variation into models of residential location choice. Transportation Research Record 1998, 1617:194-202.
54. Street D., Burgess L., Louviere J.J. Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2005, 22:459-470.
55. Street, D.J. Burgess, L., 2007. The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments: Theory and Methods. Wiley Interscience. http://books.google.com/books?id=_IZ3kqzaxHMC&lpg=PP1&ots=rm688pWsob&dq=deborah%20street%20choice%20experiments&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q=&f=false.
56. Temme, D., Paulssen, M., Dannewald, T., 2007. Integrating Latent Variables in Discrete Choice Models - How Higher-Order Values and Attitudes Determine Consumer Choice. SFB 649 Discussion Paper 2007-065. ISSN 1860-5664. http://sfb649.wiwi.hu-berlin.de.
57. Timmermans H., Van der Waerden P., Alves M., Polak J., Ellis S., Harvey A.S., Kurose S., Zandee R. Time allocation in urban and transport settings: an international, inter-urban perspective. Transport Policy 2002, 9(2):79-93.
58. Vredin Johansson M., Heldt T., Johansson P. The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:507-525.
59. Walker J.L., Li J. Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions. Journal of Geographical Systems 2007, 9(1):77-101.
60. Weber J., Kwan M. Evaluating the effects of geographic contexts in individual accessibility: a multilevel approach. Urban Geography 2003, 24(8):647-671.
61. Yañez, M.F., Raveau, S., Rojas, M., Ortúzar, J. de D., 2009. Modelling and forecasting with latent variables in discrete choice panel models. In: Proceedings of ETC, 5-7 October, Leeuwenhorst, The Netherlands. http://etcproceedings.org/paper/modelling-and-forecasting-with-latent-variables-in-discrete-choice-panel-model.