Cryptic diversity and signs of mitochondrial introgression in the Agrilus viridis species complex (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)

European Journal of Entomology

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 475-486

  Pentinsaari, Mikko ^a   Mutanen, Marko ^a   Kaila, Lauri ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Agrilus; Buprestidae; Coleoptera; Cryptic diversity; DNA barcoding; Geometric morphometrics; Mitochondrial introgression

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BIOMARKER; HYBRIDIZATION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TAXONOMY;

AGRILUS; AGRILUS VIRIDIS; ALNUS; ALNUS VIRIDIS; BETULA; BUPRESTIDAE; COLEOPTERA; SALIX;

EID: 84907571513     PISSN: 12105759     EISSN: 18028829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2014.072     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alexeev A.V. 1969: [On food forms of the flat-headed pear-borer Agrilus viridis L. (Coleoptera, Buprestidae)]. - Zool. Zh. 48: 85-92 [in Russian with English abstr.].
2. Astrin J.A., Stüben P.E., Misof B., Wägele J.W., Gimnich F., Raupach M.J. & Ahrens D. 2012:. Exploring diversity in cryptorhynchine weevils (Coleoptera) using distance-, character- and tree-based species delineation. - Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 63: 1-14.
3. Bellamy C.L. 2012: Genus Agrilus Curtis 1825. A Checklist of World Buprestoidea. Available at: http://www.fond4beetles. com/Buprestidae/WorldCat/Genera/Agrilus.htm. Accessed 27 August 2012.
4. Bergsten J., Bilton D.T., Fujisawa T., Elliott M., Monaghan M.T., Balke M., Hendrich L., Geijer J., Herrmann J., Foster G.N., Ribera I., Nilsson A.N., Barraclough T.G. & Vogler A.P. 2012: The effect of geographical scale of sampling on DNA barcoding. - Syst. Biol. 61: 851-869.
5. Bernhard D., Fritzsch G., Glöckner P. & Wurst K. 2005: Molecular insights into speciation in the Agrilus viridis-complex and the genus Trachys (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). - Eur. J. Entomol. 102: 599-605.
6. Bílỳ S. 1982: The Buprestidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. - Fauna Entomol. Scand. 10, 109 pp.
7. Blaxter M.L. 2004: The promise of a DNA taxonomy. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 359: 669-679.
8. Bookstein F. 1991: Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, New York, 456 pp.
9. Bookstein F. 1997: Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. - Med. Image Anal. 1: 225-244.
10. Brechtel F. & Kostenbader H. 2002: Die Pracht- und Hirschkäfer Baden-Württembergs. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 632 pp.
11. Breuker C.J., Patterson J.S. & Klingenberg C.P. 2006: A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape. - PLoS ONE 1(1): e7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000007
12. Funk D.J. & Omland K.E. 2003: Species-level araphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 397-423.
13. Hajibabaei M., Janzen D.H., Burns J.M., Hallwachs W. & Hebert P.D.N. 2006: DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103: 968-971.
14. Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball S.L. & deWaard J. 2003: Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. - Proc. R. Soc. (B) 270: 313-321.
15. Hebert P.D.N., Penton E.H., Burns J.M., Janzen D.H. & Hallwachs W. 2004: Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101: 14812-14817.
16. Heering H. 1956a: Zur Biologie, ökologie und zum Massenwechsel des Buckenprachtkafers (Agrilus viridis L.). I. Teil. - Z. Angew. Entomol. 38: 249-287.
17. Heering H. 1956b: Zur Biologie, ökologie und zum Massenwechsel des Buckenprachtkafers (Agrilus viridis L.). II. Teil. - Z. Angew. Entomol. 39: 76-114.
18. Hellrigl K.G. 1978: ökologie und Brutpflanzen europäischer Prachtkäfer (Col., Buprestidae). Teil 2. - Z. Angew. Entomol. 85: 253-257.
19. Ivanova N. & Grainger C. 2012a: CCDB Protocols: COI Amplification. Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding. Available at: http://www.dnabarcoding.ca/CCDB_DOCS/CCDB_Amplification. pdf
20. Ivanova N. & Grainger C. 2012b: CCDB Protocols: Sequencing. Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding. Available at: http:// www.dnabarcoding.ca/CCDB_DOCS/CCDB_Sequencing.pdf
21. Janz N. & Nylin S. 1998: Butterflies and plants: a phylogenetic study. - Evolution 52: 486-502.
22. Jendek E. 2006: Genus Agrilus. In Löbl I. & Smetana A. (eds): Catalogue of Palearctic Coleoptera. Vol. 3. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, pp. 388-403.
23. Kaila L. & Ståhls G. 2006: DNA barcodes: Evaluating the potential of COI to diffentiate closely related species of Elachista (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Elachistidae) from Australia. - Zootaxa 1170: 1-26.
24. Kendall D.G. 1977: The diffusion of shape. - Adv. Appl. Probab. 9: 428-430.
25. Klingenberg C.P. 2011: MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. - Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11: 353-357.
26. Kovarovic K., Aiello L.C., Cardini A. & Lockwood C.A. 2011: Discriminant function analyses in archaeology: are classification rates too good to be true? - J. Archaeol. Sci. 38: 3006- 3018.
27. Lompe A. 1979: Tribus Agrilini. In Freude H., Harde K.W. & Lohse G.A. (eds): Die Käfer Mitteleuropas, Band 6: Diversicornia. Goecke & Evers, Krefeld, pp. 230-243.
28. Monaghan M.T., Balke M., Pons J. & Vogler A.P. 2005: Beyond barcodes: complex DNA taxonomy of a South Pacific Island radiation. - Proc. R. Soc. (B) 273: 887-893.
29. Mutanen M. & Pretorius E. 2007: Subjective visual evaluation vs. traditional and geometric morphometrics in species delimitation: a comparison of moth genitalia. - Syst. Entomol. 32: 371-386.
30. Mutanen M., Kaitala A. & Mönkkönen M. 2006: Genital variation within and between three closely related Euxoa moth species: testing the lock-and-key hypotheses. - J. Zool. (Lond.) 268: 109-119.
31. Mutanen M., Aarvik L., Landry J.F., Segerer A. & Karsholt O. 2012a: Epinotia cinereana (Haworth, 1811) bona sp., a Holarctic tortricid distinct from E. nisella (Clerck, 1759) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Eucosmini) as evidenced by DNA barcodes, morphology and life history. - Zootaxa 3318: 1-25.
32. Mutanen M., Aarvik L., Huemer P., Kaila L., Karsholt O. & Tuck K. 2012b: DNA barcodes reveal that the widespread European tortricid moth Phalonidia manniana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is a mixture of two species. - Zootaxa 3262: 1-21.
33. Rohlf F.J. 2004: tpsDig, version 1.40. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Available: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/softdataacq.html
34. Rohlf F.J. 2007: tpsRelw, version 1.45. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Available: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/soft-tps.html
35. Rohlf F.J. & Marcus L.F. 1993: A revolution in morphometrics. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 129-132.
36. Segerer A.H., Haslberger A. & Grünewald T. 2010: Olethreutes subtilana (Falkovich, 1959): Unexpected occurrence of an 'eastern' leaf roller in Central Europe, uncovered by DNA barcoding (Tortricidae: Olethreutinae). - Nota Lepidopterol. 33: 197-206.
37. Smith M.A. & Fisher B.L. 2009: Invasions, DNA barcodes, and rapid biodiversity assessment using ants of Mauritius. - Front. Zool. 6: 31.
38. Smith M.A., Fisher B.L. & Hebert P.D.N. 2005: DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 360: 1825-1834.
39. Smith M.A., Woodley N.E., Janzen D.H., Hallwachs W. & Hebert P.D.N. 2006: DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103: 3657-3662.
40. Smith M.A., Poyarkov N.A. & Hebert P.D.N. 2008: CO1 DNA barcoding amphibians: take the chance, meet the challenge. - Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8: 235-246.
41. Stanley S.M. & Yang X. 1987: Approximate evolutionary stasis for bivalve morphology over millions of years: A multivariate, multilineage study. - Paleobiology 13: 113-139.
42. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M. & Kumar S. 2011: MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. - Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2731-2739.
43. Viscosi V. & Cardini A. 2011: Leaf morphology, taxonomy and geometric morphometrics: A simplified protocol for beginners. - PLoS One 6: e25630.
44. Ward R.D., Zemlak T.S., Innes B.H., Last P.R. & Hebert P.D.N. 2005: DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 360: 1847-1857.
45. Whitworth T.L., Dawson R.D., Magalon H. & Baudry E. 2007: DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). - Proc. R. Soc. (B) 274: 1731-1739.
46. Wilson E.O. 2003: The encyclopedia of life. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 77-80.
47. Zelditch M.L., Swiderski D.L., Sheets H.D. & Fink W.L. 2004: Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: a Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, 443 pp.