A GIS-based seismic hazard, building vulnerability and human loss assessment for the earthquake scenario in Tabriz

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 66, Issue , 2014, Pages 263-280

  Karimzadeh, Sadra ^a   Miyajima, Masakatsu ^a   Hassanzadeh, Reza ^b   Amiraslanzadeh, Reza ^a   Kamel, Batoul ^c  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ   (Iran)

Author keywords

GIS oriented; North Tabriz fault; Seismic microzonation; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; FAULTING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); BUILDING VULNERABILITIES; GEOPHYSICAL PARAMETERS; GIS-ORIENTED; NEAR-FIELD EARTHQUAKES; RELATIONAL ANALYSIS; SEISMIC MICROZONATION; VULNERABILITY; EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO;

EARTHQUAKES;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; BUILDING; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; GIS; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; VULNERABILITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE MECHANISM; FAULT ZONE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY;

EAST AZERBAIJAN; IRAN; TABRIZ;

EID: 84907312003     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.026     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER). ; 2010. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/pager/S.
2. Porter KA, Jaiswal K, Wald DJ, Hearne M. Developing loss models for the US geological survey's Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) system. In: Proceedings of 14 WCEE. Beijing, China; 2008.
3. Erdik M., Şeşetyan K., Demircioǧlu M.B., Hancilar U., Zülfikar C. Rapid earthquake loss assessment after damaging earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2011, 31:247-266.
4. FEMA. HAZUSMH MR4 Earthquake model user manual. Department of Homeland Security. Federal emergency management agency. Mitigation Division. Washington, D.C. 2012. ; 2003a. http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=3732.
5. FEMA. HAZUSMH MR4 Earthquake model technical manual. Department of Homeland Security. Federal emergency management agency. Mitigation Division. Washington, D.C. 2012. ; 2003b. http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=3732.
6. Yuba County, multi-jurisdictional multi-hazard mitigation plan. http://www.co.yuba.ca.us.
7. FEMA. Harris County, Texas uses HAZUS-multi hazard for risk assessment & hurricane preparedness. ; 2005. http://www.fema.gov/hazus/harris-county-texas-uses-hazus-multi-hazard-risk-assessment-hurricane-preparedness.
8. Cinicioglu S.F., Bozbey I., Oztoprak S., Kelesoglu M.K. An integrated earthquake damage assessment methodology and its application for two districts in Istanbul, Turkey. Eng Geol 2007, 94:145-165.
9. Ansal A., Kurtulus A., Tonuk G. Seismic microzonation and earthquake damage scenarios for urban areas. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2010, 30:1319-1328.
10. Armaş I. Multi-criteria vulnerability analysis to earthquake hazard of Bucharest, Romania. Nat Hazards 2012, 63:1129-1156.
11. W.Cole S., Xu Y., W.Burton P. Seismic hazard and risk in Shanghai and estimation of expected building damage. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2008, 28:778-794.
12. Hashemi M., Alesheikh A.A. A GIS-based earthquake damage assessment and settlement methodology. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2011, 31:1607-1617.
13. Hassanzadeh R., Zorica N., Alavi Razavi A., Norouzzadeh M., Hodhodkian H. Interactive approach for GIS-based earthquake scenario development and resource estimation (Karmania hazard model). Comput Geosci 2013, 51:324-338.
14. Kamel B. Crisis management of earthquake in pre-occurrence stage by using of GIS. Case study: Municipality of Tabriz region 1 2012, (Master of Science thesis), University of Tabriz, Faculty of Geography.
15. Jackson J. Partitioning of strike-slip and convergent motion between Eurasia and Arabia in Eastern Turkey and the Caucasus. J Geophys Res 1992, 97(B9):12471-12479.
16. McClusky, et al. GPS constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J Geophys Res 2000, 105:5695-5719.
17. Westaway R. Block rotation in western Turkey 1. Observational evidence. J Geophys Res 1990, 95(B12):19857-19884.
18. McKenzie D.P. Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Geophys J R Astron Soc 1972, 30:109-185.
19. Toksöz M.N., Arpat E., Saroglu F. East Anatolia earthquake of 24 November, 1976. Nature 1977, 270:423-425.
20. Jackson J., McKenzie D.P. The relationship between plate motions and seismic moment tensors, and the rates of active deformation in the Mediterranean and the Middle East. Geophys J Int 1988, 93:45-73.
21. Hessami Kh, Jamali F, Tabassi H. Major active faults of Iran. International institute of earthquake engineering and seismology, 1 sheet, scale 1:2,500,000: Tehran, Iran; 2003.
22. Berberian M. Natural hazards and the first earthquake catalog of Iran. Int Inst Earthq Eng Seismol 1994, 1:266-270.
23. Karimzadeh S., Cakir Z., Osmanoǧlu B., Schmalzle G., Miyajima M., Amiraslanzadeh R., et al. Interseismic strain accumulation across the North Tabriz Fault (NW Iran) deduced from InSAR time series. J Geodyn 2013, 66:53-58.
24. Dehghani G.A, Makris J. The gravity field and crustal structure of Iran. Geol Surv Iran 1983, 51:51-68.
25. Tehran Padir Consulting Co. Tabriz seismic microzoation investigations; 2006.
26. Nowroozi A.A. Empirical relations between magnitude and fault parameters for earthquakes in Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1985, 75:1327-1338.
27. Wells D.L, Coppersmith K.J. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1994, 84:974-1002.
28. Mohajer A, Nowroozi A.A. Observed and probable Intensity Zoning of Iran. Tectonophysics 1987, 49:21-30.
29. Bonilla M.G, Mark R.K, Lienkaemper J.J. Statistical relations among earthquake magnitude, surface rupture length, and surface fault displacement. Seismol Soc Am Bull 1984, 74:2379-2411.
30. Pazhouhesh Omran Rahvar Engineering Consultants. Interim report of geotechnical investigations of Tabriz Urban Railway project; 2008.
31. Assadian O, Eftekharnejad J, Jalilian M, Afsharianzadeh AM. Geology map of Tabriz region. Geological survey of Iran. 1 sheet, scale 1:100,000.
32. Barthelmes F. Definition of Functionals of the Geopotential and Their Calculation from Spherical Harmonic Models. ; 2013. http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/ICGEM.
33. Kiamehr R, Sjöberg L.E. Impact of a precise geoid model in studying tectonic structures - a case study in Iran. J Geodyn 2006, 42:1-11.
34. Fallahi A, Erami MH, Mashayekhi hR, Miyajima M. Microtremor and shear wave velocity measurements in tabriz to use in seismic microzonation. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering; 2011.
35. Abdolahi MR, Jamali F, Pedrami M, Haddadan M, Ghaemi J, Ghomashi A. Engineering geological maps of Tabriz. Engineering (compressive strength, suspectibility to slide, discontinuity surface). Geological Survey of Iran. 1 sheet, scale 1:50,000.
36. Iranian building codes and standards, standard no. 2800 1999, Iranian code of practice for seismic resistance design of buildings, Building and Housing Research Center (BHRC). 3rd ed.
37. Child C. Interpolating surfaces in ArcGIS spatial analyst. Arc User 2004, 32-35.
38. Wang Z. Seismic hazard assessment: issues and alternatives. Pure Appl Geophys 2011, 168:11-25.
39. Mualchin L, Jones AL. Peak acceleration from maximum credible earthquakes in California. California Department Conservation. Open-File Rep. 92-01; 1992. p. 53 & Map.
40. Mualchin L. Development of the Caltrans deterministic fault and earthquake hazard map of California. Eng Geol 1996, 42:217-222.
41. Mualchin L History of modern earthquake hazard mapping and assessment in California using a deterministic or scenario approach. Pure Appl Geophys 2011, 168:383-407.
42. Hamzeloo H, Mahood M. Ground-motion attenuation relationship for East Central Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2012, 102:2677-2684.
43. Saffari H, Kuwata Y, Takada S, Mahdavian A. Updated PGA, PGV, and Spectral Acceleration Attenuation Relations for Iran. Earthq Spectra 2012, 28:257-276.
44. Chandra V, Mc Whorter J.G, Nowroozi A.A. Attenuation of intensities in Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1979, 69:237-250.
45. Siahkali Moradi A, Mirzaei N, Rezapour M. Attenuation relationships of seismic intensity in Iran. J Earth Sp Phys 2004, 30:1-9.
46. The Study on Seismic Microzoning of the Greater Tehran Area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Final Report. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Centre for Earthquake and Environmental Studies of Tehran (CEST) and Tehran Municipality; 2000.
47. ATC-13 Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California. Applied Technology Council: Redwood city, CA; 1985.
48. Grünthal G. European Macroseismic Scale 1998(EMS-98). Cahiers du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie 1998, vol. 15:99. Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie, Luxembourg.
49. Coburn A, Spence R. Earthquake protection 2002, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, England. 2nd ed.
50. Karmania Hazard Model User Manual 2008, 235. Kerman Disaster Management Center (KDMC), Kerman, Iran.
51. Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response (Sphere) 2004, The Sphere Project, Belmont Press Ltd, Northampton, United Kingdom.
52. Miyajima M., Fallahi A., Sadeghi A., Ghanbari E., Soltani H., Amiraslanzadeh R., Vakilazadsarabi A., Forounzandeh F., Sheikhalizadeh R. Site Investigation of the Ahar-Varzeghan Earthquake in NW Iran of August 11, 2012 2013, Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE), ; Fact sheet: FS2013-E-0001: 1-8.
53. Zare M, Kalantari A, Ansari A, Haghshenas E, Davoudi M, Mostafazadeh M. Reconnaissance report of Varzeghan twin earthquakes (Ahar county - Eastern Azerbaijan) of International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES); 2012 [in Persian].
54. Iran Strong Motion Network. Building and housing research center. http://www.bhrc.ac.ir/Portal/Default.aspx?alias=www.bhrc.ac.ir/Portal/ismnen.