Seismic microzonation and earthquake damage scenarios for urban areas

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1319-1328

  Ansal, Atilla ^a   Kurtuluş, Asli ^a   Tönük, Gökçe ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION-TIME HISTORY; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGES; GEOTECHNICAL; GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS; GROUND SURFACES; ISTANBUL , TURKEY; MICROZONATION; PILOT STUDIES; PIPE-LINE SYSTEMS; SEISMIC DAMAGE; SEISMIC MICROZONATION; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; SITE CONDITIONS; SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SITE-SPECIFIC; SOIL PROFILES; TWO STAGE; URBAN AREAS;

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; SOILS;

EARTHQUAKES;

BUILDING; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; PIPELINE; SEISMOLOGY; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; SOIL PROFILE; URBAN AREA; VULNERABILITY; ZONATION;

ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 77955518062     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hazus Earthquake loss estimation methodology. Technical manual 2003, Federal Emergency Management Agency and National Institute of Buildings Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
2. Zonno G., Garcia-Fernandez M., Jimenez M.J., Menoni S., Meroni1 F., Petrini V. The SERGISAI procedure for seismic risk assessment. Journal of Seismology 2003, 7:259-277.
3. RISK-UE. An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns: synthesis of the application to Thessaloniki city, Pitilakis K, A., RISK-UE report, 2004.
4. Sousa ML, Campos Costa A, Carvalho A, Coelho E. An automatic seismic scenario loss methodology integrated on a geographic information system. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 1-6, Paper no. 2526, 2004.
5. Molina-Palacios S, Lindholm CD. SELENA V1.0 user and technical manual. Norway: NORSAR; 2006. http://www.norsar.no/seismology/selena.html.
6. Idriss IM, Sun JI. Shake91, a computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits modified based on the original SHAKE program published in December 1972 by Schnabel, Lysmer and Seed, 1992.
7. Ansal A, Tönük G. Source and site effects for microzonation. In: Pitilakis K, editor. Theme lecture, 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Springer; 2007. p. 73-92 [Chapter 4].
8. Ansal A., Akinci G., Cultrera M., Erdik V., Pessina G., Tonuk G., et al. Loss estimation in Istanbul based on deterministic earthquake scenarios of the Marmara Sea Region (Turkey). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2009, 29(4):699-709.
9. Ansal A, Durukal E, Tönük G. Selection and scaling of real acceleration time histories for site response analyses. In: Proceedings of the ISSMGE ETC12 Athens Workshop, Athens, Greece, 2006.
10. Durukal E, Ansal A, Tönük G. Effect of ground motion scaling and uncertainties in site characterisation on site response analyses. In: Proceedings of the 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference Commemorating the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, San Francisco, USA, 2006.
11. Borcherdt R.D. Estimates of site dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthquake Spectra 1994, 10(4):617-654.
12. Ansal A, Laue J, Buchheister J, Erdik M, Springman SM, Studer J, et al. Site characterization and site amplification for a seismic microzonation study in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering and 3rd Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 2004.
13. NEHRP. Recommended provisions for new buildings and other structures, FEMA-450, prepared by the Building Seismic Safety Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2003.
14. Ansal A, Tönük G, Demircioglu M, Bayrakli Y, Sesetyan K, Erdik M. Ground motion parameters for vulnerability assessment. In: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, Paper number: 1790, 2006.
15. Erdik M, Fahjan Y. System analysis and risk. In: Oliveira CS, Roca A, Goula X, editors. Assessing and managing earthquake risk geo-scientific and engineering knowledge for earthquake risk mitigation: developments, tools, techniques, Part 3, Book series: Geotechnical, Geological, and earthquake engineering, vol. 2, 2005.
16. Ansal A, Erdik M, Studer J, Springman S, Laue J, Buchheister J, et al.. Seismic microzonation for earthquake risk mitigation in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, CD paper no. 1428, 2004.
17. ATC & SSC. ATC-40 seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Report SSC 96-01, California, EUA, 1996.
18. FEMA273 NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings 1997, Federal Emergency Management Agency, SW Washington, DC, USA.
19. FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings 2000, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
20. Kircher C.A., Nassar A.A., Kustu O., Holmes W.T. Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation. Earthquake Spectra 1997, 13(4):663-682.
21. KoeriLossV2. Earthquake disaster scenario prediction and loss modelling for urban areas. In: Spence R, editor. EU FP6 project on risk mitigation for earthquakes and landslides report, 2007.
22. Erdik M, Demircioglu M, Sesetyan K, Durukal E. Assessment of earthquake hazard for Bakirköy, Gemlik, Bandirma, Tekirdaĝ and Körfez, WB MEER project -A3 component, microzonation and hazard vulnerability studies for disaster mitigation in pilot municipalities, Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2005.
23. Erdik M., Demircioglu M., Sesetyan K., Durukal E., Siyahi B. Earthquake hazard in Marmara region. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2004, 24:605-631.
24. OYO Inc., Japan. Production of microzonation report and maps on European side (south). Final report to Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, 2007.
25. Aydinoglu N, Polat Z. First level evaluation and assessment of building earthquake performance. Report for the Istanbul Master Plan Zeytinburnu Pilot Project, Metropolitan Municipality of Istanbul, Planning and Construction Directorate, 2004 [in Turkish].
26. Erdik M., Aydinoglu N., Barka A., Yüzügüllü Ö, Siyahi B., Durukal E., et al. BU-ARC, earthquake risk assessment for Istanbul metropolitan area, project report 2002, Bogazici University Publication.
27. Erdik M., Aydinoglu N., Fahjan Y., Sesetyan K., Demircioglu M., Siyahi B., et al. Earthquake risk assessment for Istanbul metropolitan area. Earthquake Engineering & Engineering Vibration 2003, 2(1):1-25.
28. Vucetic M., Dobry R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE 1991, 117(1):89-107.
29. Darendeli MB. A new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. PhD thesis, Civil Engineering Department, University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
30. Seed H.B., Wong R.T., Idriss I.M., Tokimatsu K. Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analysis of cohesionless soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1986, 112(11):1016-1032.
31. Menq FY, Stokoe KH, Kavazanjian E. Linear dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils from largescale resonant tests. In: International symposium IS Lyon 03, deformation characteristics of geomaterials, Lyon, France, 22-24 September 2003.
32. EPRI. Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions, vol. 1, Palo Alto, CA, Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI TR-102293, 1993.
33. O'Rourke M., Ayala G. Pipeline damage due to wave propagation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1993, 119(9):1490-1498.
34. Eidinger J, Avila E. Guidelines for the seismic upgrade of water transmission facilities. Monograph no. 15, TCLEE/ASCE, 1999.
35. ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). Seismic fragility formulations for water systems, part 1-guideline, 2001. http://www.americanlifelinesalliance.org.
36. O'Rourke M., Deyoe E. Seismic damage to segmented buried pipe. Earthquake Spectra 2004, 20:1167-1183.