A GIS-based earthquake damage assessment and settlement methodology

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1607-1617

  Hashemi, Mahdi ^a   Alesheikh, Ali Asghar ^a  

^a K N TOOSI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE FAULT; BAM EARTHQUAKE; BUILDING COLLAPSE; BUILDING POPULATION; BUILDING STOCKS; COLLAPSED BUILDINGS; DATA SETS; DEATH RATES; DECISION MAKERS; DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGES; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; EARTHQUAKE LOSS ESTIMATION; EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO; ECONOMIC IMPACTS; FRAGILITY CURVES; GROUND SHAKING EFFECTS; INJURY RATE; POPULATION CENSUS; RELIABLE DECISION; RESIDENTIAL SITE; SOIL STRUCTURE; SPATIAL DATASETS; STRUCTURAL DAMAGES; TEHRAN , IRAN; TOTAL LOSS; URBANIZED AREA;

BUILDINGS; EARTHQUAKES; PLANT SHUTDOWNS; POPULATION STATISTICS; RATING;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

ACTIVE FAULT; AFTERSHOCK; BAM EARTHQUAKE 2003; BUILDING; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; GIS; SAFETY;

IRAN; TEHRAN [IRAN];

EID: 80051812164     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Montoya L., Masser I. Management of natural hazard risk in Cartago, Costa Rica. Habitat International 2005, 29:493-509.
2. Branscomb L.M. Sustainable cities: safety and security. Technology in Society 2006, 28:225-234.
3. Handmer J., Dovers S. Handbook of disaster and emergency policies and institutions 2007, Earthscan Publications.
4. Olsen G.R., Carstensen N., Hoyen K. Humanitarian crisis: what determines the level of emergency assistance? Media coverage, donor interest and the aid business. Disasters 2003, 27:109-126.
5. Karimi I., Hüllermeier E. Risk assessment system of natural hazards: a new approach based on fuzzy probability. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2007, 158:987-999.
6. Drabek T.E., Hoetmer G.J. Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government 1991, International City Management Association, Washington, DC.
7. Xu L., Liu G. The study of a method of regional environmental risk assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:3290-3296.
8. Schneider P.J., Schauer B.A. HAZUS-Its development and its future. Natural Hazards Review 2006, 7:40-44.
9. Vahidnia M.H., Alesheikh A.A., Alimohammadi A., Hosseinali F.A. GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences 2010, 36:1101-1114.
10. Westen C.V. Geoinformation science and earth observation for municipal risk management; The SLARIM project 2004, International Instititute for Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation, ITC.
11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: earthquake model (HAZUS-MHMR1), Technical manual; 2003.
12. Michalowski W., Kersten G., Koperczak Z., Szpakowicz S. Disaster management with NEGOPLAN. Expert Systems With Applications 1991, 2:107-120.
13. Bird J.F., Bommer J.J. Earthquake losses due to ground failure. Engineering Geology 2004, 75:147-179.
14. Ergonul S. A probabilistic approach for earthquake loss estimation. Structural Safety 2005, 27:309-321.
15. Feyza Cinicioglu S., Bozbey I., Oztoprak S., Kubilay Kelesoglu M. An integrated earthquake damage assessment methodology and its application for two districts in Istanbul, Turkey. Engineering Geology 2007, 94:145-165.
16. Srinivas H., Nakagawa Y. Environmental implications for disaster preparedness: lessons learnt from the Indian Ocean Tsunami. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 89:4-13.
17. Tinguaro Rodriguez J, Vitoriano B, Montero J. A general methodology for data-based rule building and its application to natural disaster management. Computers and Operation Research, in press. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2009.11.014.
18. Ansal A., Akinci A., Cultrera G., Erdik M., Pessina V., Tonuk G., et al. Loss estimation in Istanbul based on deterministic earthquake scenarios of the Marmara Sea region (Turkey). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2009, 29:699-709.
19. Ashtari M., Hatzfeld D., Kamalian N. Microseismicity in the region of Tehran. Tectonophysics 2005, 395:193-208.
20. Doloei J., Roberts R. Crust and uppermost mantle structure of Tehran region from analysis of teleseismic P-wave form receiver functions. Tectonophysics 2003, 364:115-133.
21. Martini P.M., Hessami K., Pantosti D., D'Addezio G., Alinaghi H., Ghafory-Ashtiani M. A geologic contribution to the evaluation of the seismic potential of the Kahrizak fault (Tehran, Iran). Tectonophysics 1998, 287:187-199.
22. Ashtari Jafari M. Statistical prediction of the next great earthquake around Tehran, Iran. Journal of Geodynamics 2010, 49:14-18.
23. Sadidkhouy A., Javan-Doloei G., Siahkoohi H.R. Seismic anisotropy in the crust and upper mantle of the Central Alborz Region, Iran. Tectonophysics 2008, 456:194-205.
24. Yaghmaei-Sabegh S., Lam N.T. Ground motion modelling in Tehran based on the stochastic method. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2010, 30:525-535.
25. Abbassi A., Nasrabadi A., Tatar M., Yaminifard F., Abbassi M.R., Hatzfeld D., et al. Crustal velocity structure in the southern edge of the Central Alborz (Iran). Journal of Geodynamics. 2010, 49:68-78.
26. Zafarani H., Noorzad A., Ansari A., Bargi K. Stochastic modeling of Iranian earthquakes and estimation of ground motion for future earthquakes in Greater Tehran. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2009, 29:722-741.
27. Hamzehloo H., Vaccari F., Panza G.F. Towards a reliable seismic microzonation in Tehran, Iran. Engineering Geology. 2007, 93:1-16.
28. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) & Center for Earthquake and Environmental Studies of Tehran (CEST) & Tehran Municipality. The study on seismic microzoning of the Greater Tehran area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Final report; 2000.
29. Kleindorfer P.R., Sertel M.R. Mitigation and Financing of Seismic Risks: Turkish and International Perspectives 2001, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
30. Chernov Y.K. Strong Ground Motion and Quantitative Estimation of Seismic Hazard 1989, Fan Publishing House, Tashkent.
31. Chernov Y.K., Sokolov V.Y. Correlation of seismic intensity with fourier acceleration spectra. Physics and Chemistry of Earth (A) 1999, 24:523-528.
32. Gupta I.M. A note of correlation of Modified Mercalli Intensity with peaks of far-field ground motion. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 1980, 70:925-932.
33. Murphy J.R., O'Brien J.L. The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 1977, 67:877-915.
34. Nazarov A.G., Shebalin N.V. Seismic Scale and the Methods of Seismic Intensity Measuring 1975, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow.
35. Ohta Y., Ohashi H., Ergunay O., Tabban A. Seismic intensity and its application to engineering: a study in Turkey. Strong Ground Motion Seismology 1987, 385-401.
36. Trifunac M.D., Brady A.G. On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 1975, 65:139-162.
37. Crespellani T, Vannuchi G, Zeng X. Seismic hazard analysis, Seismic hazard and site effects in the Florence Area. In: Proceedings of the Xth European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering 1991; p. 11-31.
38. Borcherdt R.D. Spatial ground motion amplification analysis. Proceedings of Geo-Logan 1997, 56-69.
39. Shafiee A., Azadi A. Shear-wave velocity characteristics of geological units throughout Tehran City, Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 2007, 29:105-115.
40. AS/NZS 1170.4. Draft Australian/New Zealand Standard for Structural Design Actions, Part 4: Earthquake Actions in Australia. Document No. D5212-5.1 issued in Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand; June 2005.
41. Lam, N.T., Gaull, B.A., & Wilson, J.L. Calculation of earthquake actions on building structures in Australia. EJSE Special Issue: Loading on Structures; 2007.
42. Askan A., Yucemen M.S. Probabilistic methods for the estimation of potential seismic damage: application to reinforced concrete buildings in Turkey. Structural Safety 2010, 32:262-271.
43. Rossetto T., Elnashai A. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Engineering Structures 2003, 25:1241-1263.
44. Coburn A., Spence R. Earthquake Protection 2002, Wiley, West Sussex, England. second ed.
45. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Website: http://www.usgs.gov.
46. Ramazi H., Soltani Jigheh H. The Bam (Iran) Earthquake of December 26, 2003: from an engineering and seismological point of view. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 2006, 27:576-584.
47. Ahmadizadeh M., Shakib H. On the December 26, 2003, southeastern Iran earthquake in Bam region. Engineering Structures 2004, 26:1055-1070.
48. Building and Housing Research Center (BHRC) Iranian code of practice for seismic resistance design of buildings. Iranian Building Codes and Standards, Standard No. 2800 1999, third ed.