Interactive approach for GIS-based earthquake scenario development and resource estimation (Karmania hazard model)

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 51, Issue , 2013, Pages 324-338

  Hassanzadeh, Reza ^a,c   Nedović Budić, Zorica ^a   Alavi Razavi, Akbar ^b   Norouzzadeh, Mohsen ^b   Hodhodkian, Hassan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b Kerman Disaster Management Center (KDMC)   (Iran)

^c International Center for Science High Technology and Environmental Sciences   (Iran)

Author keywords

Building vulnerability; Disaster management; Earthquake scenario; GIS; Karmania hazard model; Loss and resource estimation; Microzonation

Indexed keywords

DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO; HAZARD MODELS; MICROZONATION; RESOURCE ESTIMATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DISASTER PREVENTION; DISASTERS; ESTIMATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HAZARDS; RISK PERCEPTION; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EARTHQUAKES;

DECISION MAKING; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EARTHQUAKE MECHANISM; GIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VULNERABILITY;

BAM; IRAN; KERMAN [IRAN];

EID: 84870806153     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abbasnejad, A., Hassanzadeh, R., 2006. Semi Detailed Earthquake Micro Zoning and Evaluation of Earthquake Effects on the Kerman city. In: Proceedings of the 10th Symposium of Geological Society of Iran. Tarbeiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, pp. 2128-2139, (in Persian).
2. Abbasnejad A., Hassanzadeh R. Earthquake Hazard Management 2008, Kerman Disaster Management Center, Kerman, Iran, 287 pp. (in Persian).
3. Aghaie Araie, A., 2003. The Primary Report on Bam Earthquake, 49 pp (in Persian).
4. Alavi Razavi, A., 2008. Bam Earthquake Report. Kerman Disaster Management Center. 385 pp, (in Persian).
5. Ambraseys, N.N., Melville, C.P., 1982. A History of Persian Earthquakes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 219 pp.
6. Anagnostopoulosa S., Providakisb S., Salvaneschic P., Athanasopoulosa G., Bonacinad G. SEISMOCARE: an efficient GIS tool for scenario-type investigations of seismic risk of existing cities. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008, 28:73-78.
7. Anderson J.G. Benefits of scenario ground motion maps. Journal of Engineering Geology 1997, 48:43-57.
8. Ansal A., Biro Y., Erken A., Gülerce U. Seismic microzonation: a case study. Recent Advances in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering and Microzonation 2004, 253-266. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. A. Ansal (Ed.).
9. Asten, M.W., 2003. Lessons from Alternative Array Design Used for High-Frequency Micro Tremor Array Studies. In: Wilson, J.L., Lam, N.K., Gibson G., Butler, B., (Eds), Earthquake Risk Mitigation. In: Proceedings of a Conference of the Australian Earthquake Engineering Society, Melbourne, pp. 14.
10. CAPRA, 2012. Last accessed (15.07.12). http://www.ecapra.org.
11. Chandra, V., Mc Whorter, J.G., Nowroozi, A. A., 1979, Attenuation of Intensities in Iran, Bulleting of the Seismological Society of America 69, pp. 237-250.
12. Chang J.C.-J., King W.R. Measuring the performance of information systems: a functional scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems 2005, 22(1):85-115.
13. Coburn A., Spence R. Earthquake Protection 2002, John Wiley & Sons LTD, 420 pp.
14. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989, 13(3):319-339.
15. Dimitrijevic, M.D., 1973. Geology of Kerman Region. G.S.I, Report No. yu/52, 334 pp.
16. FEMA, 2003a. HAZUS®MH MR4 Earthquake Model User Manual. Department of Homeland Security. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Mitigation Division. Washington, D.C. Available at (accessed July 2012). http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=3732.
17. GEM, 2011. Last accessed 17.11.11. http://www.globalquakemodel.org/.
18. FEMA, 2003b. HAZUS®MH MR4 Earthquake Model Technical Manual. Department of Homeland Security. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Mitigation Division. Washington, D.C. Available at (accessed July 2012). http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=3732.
19. GFDRR, 2011. GFDRR Case Study: Central American Probabilistic Risk Assessment (CAPRA). World Bank. Last accessed 17.11.11at http://gfdrr.org/docs/Snapshot_CAPRA.pdf.
20. Giovinazzi, S., Lagomarsino, S., 2003. Seismic Risk Analysis: A Method for the Vulnerability Assessment of Built-up Areas. In: Proceedings of the ESREL-European Safety and Reliability Conference. Maastricht, Nederland.
21. Grünthal, G., 1998. European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98), Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 15, Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxembourg, 99 pp.
22. Gulati, B., 2006. Earthquake Risk Assessment of Building. Applicability of HAZUS in Dehradun, India, M.Sc. Thesis. International Institute of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation. The Netherland, 112 pp.
23. Hazus: (accessed: July 2012). http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/.
24. Hansen, R., Bausch, D., 2006. AGIS-Based Methodology for Exporting the Hazards US (HAZUS) Earthquake Model for Global Applications. Earthquake Workshop, Malta, pp. 64.
25. Hisada Y., Shibayama A., et al. Building damage and seismic intensity in Bam city from the 2003 Iran, Bam, earthquake. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo 2005, 79(3-4):81-94.
26. Hosseini M. Earthquake problems facing Tehran city from the point of urban planning, design and suggestion them. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering 2006, 4:32-43. (in Persian).
27. Hoseini, D., Afshin, H., 2005. Assessment of the Behavior of Essential Building for Disaster Management in Bam Earthquake. In: Proceedings of International Congress of Geological Hazard, Natural Disaster and Solutions to Contrast Them. Tabriz University. Tabriz, Iran, pp. 552-561, (in Persian).
28. Huckreide R., Kursten M., Venzlaff I.T. Zur geologie des Gebietes zwischen Kerman and Sagand (Iran). Hannover Bundesanstact for Boden for schung 1962, 198.
29. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), and Center for Earthquake and Environmental Studies of Tehran (CEST), 2000. The Study on Seismic Microzoning of the Greater Tehran Area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran, Iran. 1, pp. 379.
30. KDMC, 2008. Kramania Hazard Model User Manual. Kerman Disaster Management Center. Kerman, Iran, pp. 235.
31. Kircher C.A., Seligson H.A., Bouabid J., Morrow G.C. When the big one strikes again-estimated losses due to a repeat of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 2006, 22(2):S297-S339.
32. Kuzera, K., Pontius, R.G.J., 2004. Categorical Coefficients of Agreement for Assessing Soft-Classified Maps at Multiple Resolutions. The International Environmetrics Society and 6th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment. Portland, Maine, USA, pp.11.
33. Management and Planning Organization, 2007. The Report of Population in Kerman city in 2006. Published by Management and Planning Organization, pp. 124.
34. Mohajer Ashjai A., Noroozi A.A. Observed and probable intensity Zoning of Iran. Tectonophysics: 1978, 49:149-160.
35. Molina S., Lang D.H., Lindholm C.D. SELENA-An open-source tool for seismic risk and loss assessment using a logic tree computation procedure. Computers & Geosciences 2010, 36:257-269.
36. Molina, S., Lindholm, C.D., 2006. A Capacity Spectrum Method Based Tool Developed to Properly Include the Uncertainties in the Seismic Risk Assessment. Under a Logic Tree Scheme. ECI Geohazards-Technical. Economical and Social Risk Evaluation. Lillehammer, Norway.
37. Motamed R., Ghalandarzadeh A., Tawhata I., Tabatabaei S.H. Seismic microzonation and damage assessment of Bam City, Southeastern Iran. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2007, 11(1):110-132.
38. Nadim F., Moghtederi-zadeh M., Lindholm C., Anderson A., Remseth S., Bolourchi M., Mokhtari M., Tvedt E. The Bam earthquake of 26 December 2003. Bulletin Earthquake Engineering 2004, 2(2):119-153.
39. Nowroozi A.A. Empirical relations between magnitudes and fault parameters for earthquakes in Iran. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1985, 75(5):1327-1338.
40. Okada, H., 2003. The Microtremor Survey Method. American Geophysical Monograph:12, Society of Exploration Geophysicist, 135 pp.
41. RADIUS, http://www.geohaz.org/projects/radius.html.
42. Roostaeian M., Ghoreshi M. Determination of ground period in Kerman city using micro tremor, SE Iran. Journal of Geosciences 1999, 61:108-115.
43. Saita, J., Bautista, M.L.P. Nakamura, Y., 2004. On relationship between The estimated strong motion characteristic of surface layer and the earthquake damage case study at intramuros. In: proceeding of the Metro Manila13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
44. Schneider Philip J., Schauer Barbara A. HAZUS-Its development and its future. Natural Hazards Review Journal 2006, 7(2):40-44.
45. Sphere, 2004, Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response, Northampton, United Kingdom, The Sphere Project, Belmont Press Ltd.
46. Tokimatsu, K., 1997. Geotechnical site characterization using surface waves. In: proceedings of the 1st International Conference Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Ishihara (Ed), Balkema, pp. 1333-1368.
47. Trifunac M.D., Todorovska M.I. Northridge, California, earthquake of 1994: density of pipe breaks and surface strains. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1997, 16:193-207.
48. Villacis C.A., Cardona C.N. RADIUS Methodology-Guidelines for the Implementation of Earthquake Management Projects Geohazrad International 1999, Palo Alto, California, pp. 130.
49. Wald D.J., Quitoriano V., Heaton T.H., Kanamori H. Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 1999, 15:557-564.
50. Zhao S. GisFFE-an integrated software system for the dynamic simulation of fires following an earthquake based on GIS. Fire Safety Journal 2010, 45:83-97.