Pragmatism as a Paradigm for Social Research

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1045-1053

  Morgan, David L ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

John Dewey; methodologies; methods of inquiry; mixed methods design; pragmatism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907159660     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800413513733     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Biesta G.Handbook of mixed methods research for the social & behavioral sciences. (2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods research for the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed. pp. 95-118). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2010:95-118.
2. Biesta G.,Barbules N.Pragmatism and educational research. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004:
3. Denzin N.Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs.Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16:419-427
4. Denzin N.Triangulation 2.0.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2012;6:80-88
5. Dewey J.The middle works of John Dewey, 1899-1924. Boydston J., ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008:105-353.
6. Dewey J.The middle works of John Dewey, 1899-1924. Boydston J.Hahn L., ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008:1-215.
7. Dewey J.The middle works of John Dewey, 1899-1924. Boydston J.Ross R., ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008:77-202.
8. Dewey J.The middle works of John Dewey, 1899-1924. Boydston J.Murphy G., ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008:1-227.
9. Dewey J.The later works of John Dewey, 1925-1953. Boydston J.Hook S., ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008:1-437.
10. Dewey J.The later works of John Dewey, 1925-1953. Boydston J.Gouinlock J., ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008:235-372.
11. Dewey J.The later works of John Dewey, 1925-1953. Boydston J.Gouinlock J., ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008:224-230.
12. Dewey J.The later works of John Dewey, 1925-1953. Boydston J., ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008:168-188.
13. Gage N. L.The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical” sketch of research and teaching since 1989.Educational Researcher. 1989;18:4-10
14. Guba E.The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1990:
15. Guba E.,Lincoln Y.Handbook of qualitative research. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Denzin N.Lincoln Y., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2005:191-215.
16. Hall J.Pragmatism, evidence, and mixed methods evaluation (Special Issue: Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation).New Directions for Evaluation. 2013;2013 (138): 15-26
17. Hesse-Biber S.Feminist approaches to triangulation: Uncovering subjugated knowledge and fostering social change in mixed methods research.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2012;6:137-146
18. Hesse-Biber S.,Leavy P.Handbook of emergent methods. Hess-Biber S.Leavy P., ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008:1-15.
19. Howe K. R.Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard.Educational Researcher. 1988;17:10-16
20. James W.Pragmatism. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications; 1995:
21. Johnson B.,Onwuegbuzie A.Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come.Educational Researcher. 2004;33 (7): 14-26
22. Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolutions. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996:
23. Lincoln Y.“What a long, strange trip it’s been…”: Twenty-Five years of qualitative and new paradigm research.Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16:3-9
24. Maxcy S.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Tashakorri A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003:51-90.
25. Mertens D. M.Handbook of mixed-methods in social and behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003:135-166.
26. Mills C.Sociology and pragmatism: The higher learning in America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1964:
27. Morgan D. L.Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1:48-76
28. Morgan D. L.Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2013:
29. Patton M.Qualitative approaches to evaluation in educational research. Fetterman D., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1988:116-137.
30. Pearce D.Mixed methods inquiry in sociology.American Behavioral Scientist. 2012;56:829-848
31. Seigfried C.Pragmatism and feminism: Reweaving the social fabric. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996:
32. Seigfried C.Feminist interpretations of John Dewey. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2002a:
33. Seigfried C.Feminist interpretations of John Dewey. Seigfried C., ed. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2002b:47-77.
34. Strubing J.Sage handbook of grounded theory. Bryant A.Charmaz K., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007:580-601.
35. Sullivan S.Living across and through skins. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2001:
36. Tashakkori A.,Teddlie C.Handbook of mixed methods research for the social & behavioral sciences. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods research for the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 1-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2010:1-44.
37. WhippsJ. (2010). Pragmatist feminism. In ZaltaE. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available from http://plato.stanford.edu