Triangulation 2.0*

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 80-88

  Denzin, Norman K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

crystallization; incompatibility thesis; paradigm; pragmatism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861873495     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689812437186     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Berman A.Obama: Triangulation 2.0?.The Nation. 2011;:22-26.
2. Creswell J. W.Handbook of qualitative research. 2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 269-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2011:269-284.
3. Denzin N. K.The research act. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1970:.
4. Denzin, N. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press pp. 243-250.
5. Ellingson L. L.Engaging crystallization in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2009:.
6. Ellingson L. L.Handbook of qualitative research. 2011). Analysis and representation across the continuum. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 595-610). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2011:595-610.
7. Fielding N. G.Going out on a limb: Postmodernism and multiple method research.Current Sociology. 2009;3:427-447.
8. Flick U.Designing qualitative research. London, England: SAGE; 2007:.
9. Gage N. L.Educational Researcher. 1989 18 (7): 4-10.
10. Giddens A.The third way and its critics. Cambridge, England: Polity Press; 2000:.
11. Greene J. C.Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007:.
12. Guba E. G.The paradigm dialog. Guba E. G., ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1990a:17-30.
13. Guba E. G.The paradigm dialog. Guba E. G., ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1990b:368-378.
14. Guba E.,Lincoln Y. S.Paradigmatic controversies, and emerging confluences Handbook of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.)Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2005:191-216.
15. Hesse-Biber S. N.Mixed methods research: Merging theory with method. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2010:.
16. Hesse-Biber S. N.,Leavy P.Handbook of emergent methods. Hesse-Biber S. N.Leavy P., ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008:1-15.
17. Howe K. R.Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard.Educational Researcher. 1988;17:10-16.
18. Howe K. R.A critique of experimentalism.Qualitative Inquiry. 2004;10:42-61.
19. Kincheloe J. L.Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research.Qualitative Inquiry. 2001;7:679-692.
20. Lather P.Getting Lost: Feminist Efforts toward a Double(d) Science. Albany: SUNY Press; 2007:.
21. Lincoln Y. S.What a long, strange trip it's been 25 years of qualitative and new paradigm research.Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16:3-9.
22. Maxcy S. J.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003:51-90.
23. Mertens D. M.Mixed methods as tools for social change.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2011;5:195-197.
24. Mills C. W.The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1959:.
25. Morse J. M.Handbook of qualitative research. 2011). What is qualitative health research? In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 401-414). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Denzin N.Lincoln Y.,ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2011:401-414.
26. Morse J. M.,Niehaus L.Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2009:.
27. Plano Clark V. L.,Creswell J. W.The mixed methods reader. Plano Clark V. L.Creswell J. W., ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2008:xv-xviii.
28. Plano Clark V. L.,Creswell J. W.,O'Neil Green D.,Shope R. J.Handbook of emergent methods. Hesse-Biber S. N.Leavy P., ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008:363-387.
29. Richardson L.Writing: A method of inquiry Handbook of qualitative research. 2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923-948). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2000:923-948.
30. Scheurich J. J.,Clark M. C.Qualitative studies in education at the beginning of the twenty-first century.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2006;19:401.
31. Schwandt T. A.Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. 2007). Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007:.
32. Smith A. D.House arrest and piano. New York, NY: Anchor; 2004:.
33. Teddlie C.,Tashakkori A.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003a:.
34. Teddlie C.,Tashakkori A.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003b:3-50.
35. Teddlie C.,Tashakkori A.Handbook of qualitative research. 2011). Mixed methods research: Contemporary issues in an emerging field. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 285-300). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2011:285-300.
36. West C.Pragmatism: From progressivism to postmodernism. Hollinger R.Depew D., ed. Westport, CT: Praeger; 1995:314-326.