Mixed Methods Inquiry in Sociology

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 829-848

  Pearce, Lisa D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

mixed methods; sociology; survey research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860783779     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764211433798     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adams J.,Trinitapoli J.The Malawi religion project: Data collection and selected analyses.Demographic Research. 2009;21 (10): 255-288.
2. Andrews K. T.Social movements and policy implementation: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and the war on poverty, 1965-1971.American Sociological Review. 2001;66:71-95.
3. Axinn W. G.,Fricke T. E.,Thornton A.The microdemographic community-study approach.Sociological Methods and Research. 1991;20:187-218.
4. Axinn W. G.,Pearce L. D.Mixed method data collection strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
5. Becker H. S.,Geer B.,Hughes E. C.,Strauss A. L.Boys in white. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1961:.
6. Blumer M.The Chicago School of sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1984:.
7. Bourdieu P.Science of science and reflexivity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press; 2004:.
8. Bourdieu P.,Wacquant L.An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1992:.
9. Bryman A.The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A Question of method or epistemology?.British Journal of Sociology. 1984;35 (1): 75-92.
10. Bryman A.Quantity and quality in social research. 2004). Quantity and quality in social research (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.London: Routledge; 2004:.
11. Burton L. M,Jarrett R.,Lein L.,Mathews S.,Quane J.,Skinner D. Paper presented at the Society for Research and Development of Children; St. Louis, MS;.
12. Caplow T.,Bahr H. M.,Chadwick B. A.All faithful people: Change and continuity in Middletown's religion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1983:.
13. Cheatham A.,Shen E.Community-based participatory research for health. Minkler M.Wallerstein N., ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003:316-331.
14. Cherlin A. J.,Burton L. M.,Hurt T. R.,Purvin D. M.The influence of physical and sexual abuse on marriage and cohabitation.American Sociological Review. 2004;69 (6): 768-789.
15. Cherlin A. J.,Cross-Barnet C.,Burton L. M.,Garrett-Peters R.Promises they can keep: Low-Income women's attitudes toward motherhood, marriage, and divorce.Journal of Marriage and Family. 2008;70 (4): 919-933.
16. Creswell J. W.Handbook of educational policy. Cizek G. J., ed. New York: Academic Press; 1999:455-472.
17. Creswell J. W.Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE; 2003:.
18. Creswell J. W.,Plano Clark V. L.Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007:.
19. Denscombe M.Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2008;2 (3): 270-283.
20. Denzin N. K.The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1989:.
21. DuBois W. E. B.W. E. B. DuBois on sociology and the black community. Green D. S.Driver E. D., ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1995:.
22. Frazier E. F.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1932:.
23. Fries C. J.Bourdieu's reflexive sociology as a theoretical basis for mixed methods research: An application to complementary and alternative medicine.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2009;3 (4): 326-348.
24. Hanson B.Wither qualitative/quantitative?: Grounds for methodological convergence.Quality and Quantity. 2008;42:97-111.
25. Johnson B.,Gray R.Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C. B., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2010:69-94.
26. Johnson R. B.,Onwuegbuzie A. J.,Turner L. A.Toward a definition of mixed methods research.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1 (2): 112-133.
27. Kleinman S.Feminist fieldwork analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 2007:.
28. Kleinman S.,Copp M. A.Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1993:.
29. Laubach M.Consent, informal organization and job rewards: A mixed methods analysis.Social Forces. 2005;83 (4): 1535-1566.
30. Leahy E.Not by productivity alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings.American Sociological Review. 2007a;72 (4): 533-561.
31. Leahey E.Convergence.and Social Science Research. 2007b;36 (1): 149-158.
32. Lincoln Y. S.,Guba E. G.Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 1985:.
33. Lieberson S.Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1985:.
34. Lieberson S.Einstein, Renoir, and Greeley: Some thoughts about evidence in sociology.American Sociological Review. 1992;57:1-15.
35. Lipset S. M.,Trow M.,Coleman J. S.Union democracy: The internal politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: New York Free Press; 1956:.
36. Lynd R. S.,Lynd H. M.Middletown: A study in modern American culture. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace; 1929:.
37. Lynd R. S.,Lynd H. M.Middletown in transition: A study in cultural conflicts. New York: Harcourt Brace; 1937:.
38. McQuiston C.,Flaskerud J.If they don't ask about condoms, I just tell them: A descriptive case study of Latino lay health advisors' helping activities.Health Education and Behavior. 2003;30:79-96.
39. McQuiston C.,Choi-Hevel S.,Clawson M.Protegiendo nuestra comunidad Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2001;12:271-279.
40. Massey D. S.The ethnosurvey in theory and practice.International Migration Review. 1987;21:1498-1522.
41. Medawar P. B.Induction and intuition in scientific thought.Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society. 1969;75:.
42. Michels R.Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: The Free Press; 1915:.
43. Morgan D. L.Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1 (1): 48-76.
44. Onwuegbuzie A. J.,Leech N. L.Taking the "Q" out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms.Quality & Quantity. 2005;29:267-296.
45. Parrado E. A.,McQuiston C.,Flippen C. A.Participatory survey research: Integrating community collaboration and quantitative methods for the study of gender and HIV risks among Hispanic migrants.Sociological Methods and Research. 2005;34 (2): 204-239.
46. Pearce L. D.Integrating survey and ethnographic methods for systematic anomalous case analysis.Sociological Methodology. 2002;32 (1): 103-132.
47. Pearce L. D.,Denton M. L.A faith of their own: Stability and change in the religiosity of American adolescents. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011:.
48. Perry G. K.The Intersectional Approach: Transforming the Academy through Race, Class, and Gender. Berger M. T.Guidroz K., ed. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 2009:229-245.
49. Platt J.A history of sociological research methods in America: 1920-1960. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
50. Sieber S. D.The integration of fieldwork and survey methods.American Journal of Sociology. 1973;78 (6): 1335-1359.
51. Small M. L.National Science Foundation's workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research. Lamont M.White P., ed. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation; 2008:165-171.
52. Small M. L."How many cases do I need?" On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research.Ethnography. 2009;10 (1): 5-38.
53. Smith C.Denton M. L.Soul searching. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
54. Smith C.Snell P.Souls in transition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
55. Smith J.A methodology for twenty-first century sociology.Social Forces. 1991;70 (1): 1-17.
56. Smith S. S.,Moore M. R.Intraracial diversity and relations among African-Americans: closeness among black students at a predominantly white university.American Journal of Sociology. 2000;106 (1): 1-39.
57. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1998:.
58. Thomas W. I.The unadjusted girl: With cases and standpoint for behavior analysis. Little, Brown: Boston, MA; 1923:.
59. Thomas W. I.,Znaniecki F.The Polish Peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an immigrant group. Boston, MA: Richard G. Badger; 1918:.
60. Trinitapoli J.Religious exclusivism among US adolescents. The Sociological Quarterly. 2007;48:451-483.
61. Wacquant L.The double-edged sword of reason: The scholar's predicament and the sociologist's mission.European Journal of Social Theory. 1998;2-3 (Spring): 275-281.
62. Weber M.Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press; 1921/1968:.
63. WinstonP.AngelR.Chase-LansdaleP. L.CherlinA. J.MoffittR. A.WilsonW. J. (1999). Welfare, children, and families: Overview and design. Welfare, children, and families: A three-city study. Retrieved from http://www.jhu.edu/~welfare.
64. Yoshikawa H.,Weisner T. S.,Kalil A.,Way N.Mixing qualitative and quantitative research in developmental science: Uses and methodological choices.Developmental Psychology. 2008;44 (2): 344-354.