Polarization-sensitive multimodal imaging for detecting breast cancer

Cancer Research

Volumn 74, Issue 17, 2014, Pages 4685-4693

  Patel, Rakesh ^a   Khan, Ashraf ^b   Quinlan, Robert ^b   Yaroslavsky, Anna N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING;

EID: 84907059428     PISSN: 00085472     EISSN: 15387445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2411     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Cancer Society [Internet]. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. c2011 [updated 2014; cited 2014]. Available from: http://www. cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/breast-cancer-facts-figures
2. McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, Meade T, Parbhoo J, Mathias M, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:2682-90.
3. Balch CM, Jacobs LK. Mastectomies on the rise for breast cancer: "the tide is changing". Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:2669-72.
4. Gombos EC, Kacher DF, Furusawa H, Namba K. Breast focused ultrasound surgery with magnetic resonance guidance. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2006;17:181-8.
5. Hirose M, Kacher DF, Smith DN, Kaelin CM, Jolesz FA. Feasibility of MR imaging-guided breast lumpectomy for malignant tumors in a 0.5-T open-configuration MR imaging system. Acad Radiol 2002;9: 933-41.
6. Gould EW, Robinson PG. The pathologist's examination of the "lumpectomy"- the pathologists' view of surgical margins. Semin Surg Oncol 1992;8:129-35.
7. Dick AW, Sorbero MS, Ahrendt GM, Hayman JA, Gold HT, Schiffhauer L, et al. Comparative effectiveness of ductal carcinoma in situ management and the roles of margins and surgeons. J Nat Cancer Inst 2011;103:92-104.
8. Wilke LG, Brown JQ, Bydlon TM, Kennedy SA, Richards LM, Junker MK, et al. Rapid noninvasive optical imaging of tissue composition in breast tumor margins. Am J Surg 2009;198:566-74.
9. Gal AA, Cagle PT. The 100-year anniversary of the description of the frozen section procedure. JAMA 2005;294:3135-7.
10. Valdes EK, Boolbol SK, Cohen J-M, Feldman SM. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:1045-50.
11. Weinberg E, Cox C, Dupont E, White L, Ebert M, Greenberg H, et al. Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation. Am J Surg 2004;188:349-54.
12. Harigopal M, Chhieng DC. Breast cytology: current issues and future directions. Open Breast Cancer J 2010;81-9.
13. Cendán JC, Coco D, Copeland EM. Accuracy of intraoperative frozensection analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:194-8.
14. D'Halluin F, Tas P, Rouquette S, Bendavid C, Foucher F, Meshba H, et al. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2009;18:248-53.
15. Patel R, Khan A, Wirth D, Kamionek M, Quinlan R, Yaroslavsky AN. Multimodal optical imaging for detecting breast cancer. J Biomed Opt 2012;17:066008.
16. Patel R, Khan A, Kamionek M, Kandil D, Quinlan R, Yaroslavsky AN. Delineating breast ductal carcinoma using combined dye-enhanced wide-field polarization imaging and optical coherence tomography. J Biophotonics 2013;6:679-86.
17. Jacques SL, Ramella-Roman JC, Lee K. Imaging skin pathology with polarized light. J Biomed Opt. 2002;7:329-40.
18. Demos SG, Alfano RR. Optical polarization imaging. Appl Opt OSA 1997;36:150.
19. Jacques SL, Roman JR, Lee K. Imaging superficial tissues with polarized light. Lasers Surg Med 2000;26:119-29.
20. McLaughlin RA, Quirk BC, Curatolo A, Kirk RW, Scolaro L, Lorenser D, et al. Imaging of breast cancer with optical coherence tomography needle probes: feasibility and initial results. IEEE J Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2012;18:1184-91.
21. Boppart SA, Bouma BE, Pitris C, Tearney GJ, Southern JF, Brezinski ME, et al. Intraoperative assessment of microsurgery with threedimensional optical coherence tomography. Radiology 1998;208: 81-6.
22. Nguyen FT, Zysk AM, Chaney EJ, Kotynek JG, Oliphant UJ, Bellafiore FJ, et al. Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography. Cancer Res 2009;69:8790-6.
23. De Boer JF, Milner TE, van Gemert MJC, Nelson JS. Two-dimensional birefringence imaging in biological tissue by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett OSA 1997;22:934.
24. Yang Y, Wu L, Feng Y, Wang RK. Observations of birefringence in tissues from optic-fibre-based optical coherence tomography. Meas Sci Technol 2003;14:41-6.
25. Pircher M, Goetzinger E, Leitgeb R, Hitzenberger CK. Three dimensional polarization sensitive OCT of human skin in vivo. Opt Express 2004;12:3236.
26. Götzinger E, Pircher M, Sticker M, Fercher AF, Hitzenberger CK. Measurement and imaging of birefringent properties of the human cornea with phase-resolved, polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 2004;9:94-102.
27. Nour A. Efficacy of methylene blue dye in localization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients. Breast J 2004;10:388-91.
28. Varghese P, Abdel-Rahman AT, Akberali S, Mostafa A, Gattuso JM, Carpenter R. Methylene blue dye-a safe and effective alternative for sentinel lymph node localization. Breast J 2008; 14:61-7.
29. Simmons R, Thevarajah S, Brennan MB, Christos P, Osborne M. Methylene blue dye as an alternative to isosulfan blue dye for sentinel lymph node localization. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:242-7.
30. Blessing WD, Stolier AJ, Teng SC, Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM. A comparison of methylene blue and lymphazurin in breast cancer sentinel node mapping. Am J Surg 2002;184:341-5.
31. Park J, Mroz P, Hamblin MR, Yaroslavsky AN. Dye-enhanced multimodal confocal microscopy for noninvasive detection of skin cancers in mouse models. J Biomed Opt 2010;15:026023.
32. Al-Arashi MY, Salomatina E, Yaroslavsky AN. Multimodal confocal microscopy for diagnosing nonmelanoma skin cancers. Lasers Surg Med 2007;39:696-705.
33. Yaroslavsky AN, Barbosa J, Neel V, DiMarzio C, Anderson RR. Combining multispectral polarized light imaging and confocal microscopy for localization of nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Biomed Opt 2005; 10:14011.
34. Lakowicz JR. Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. p. 298-9.
35. Yaroslavsky AN, Neel V, Anderson RR. Fluorescence polarization imaging for delineatingnonmelanoma skincancers.OptLett2004;29:2010-2.
36. Yaroslavsky AN, Salomatina EV, Neel V, Anderson R, Flotte T. Fluorescence polarization of tetracycline derivatives as a technique for mapping nonmelanoma skin cancers. J Biomed Opt 2007;12:014005.
37. Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Dijckmans L, Van Der Auwera JC, Weyler J, Verslegers I, et al. MRmammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2004;14:809-16.
38. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, FletcherSW.Tenyear risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1089-96.