Rapid noninvasive optical imaging of tissue composition in breast tumor margins

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 198, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 566-574

  Wilke, Lee G ^a   Brown, J Quincy ^b   Bydlon, Torre M ^b   Kennedy, Stephanie A ^b   Richards, Lisa M ^b   Junker, Marlee K ^b   Gallagher, Jennifer ^a   Barry, William T ^b   Geradts, Joseph ^b   Ramanujam, Nimmi ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast conservation therapy; Imaging; Margin assessment; Optical spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

BETA CAROTENE;

ACCURACY; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER INVASION; CELL DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HISTOCHEMISTRY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LIGHT SCATTERING; OPTICAL SPECTRAL IMAGING; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TISSUE COMPOSITION; TISSUE LEVEL;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; OPTICAL DEVICES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REOPERATION; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

EID: 70349466659     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.018     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barth Jr. R.J., Gibson G.R., Carney P.A., et al. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 324-329
2. Dunne C., Burke J.p., Morrow M., et al. Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 27 (2009) 1615-1620
3. Poggi M.M., Danforth D.N., Sciuto L.C., et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer 98 (2003) 697-702
4. Fisher B. Highlights from recent National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project studies in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 49 (1999) 159-177
5. Clarke M., Collins R., Darby S., et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15 year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 366 (2005) 2087-2106
6. Singletary S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184 (2002) 383-393
7. Carey L.A., Perou C.M., Livasy C.A., et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina breast cancer study. JAMA 295 (2006) 2492-2502
8. Cendan J.C., Coco D., and Copeland E.M. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 201 (2005) 194-198
9. Creager A.J., Shaw J.A., Young P.R., et al. Intraoperative evaluation of lumpectomy margins by imprint cytology with histologic correlation: a community hospital experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med 126 (2002) 846-848
10. McLaughlin S.A., Ochoa-Frongia L.M., Patil S.M., et al. Influence of frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 206 (2008) 76-82
11. Cabioglu N., Hunt K.K., Sahin A.A., et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14 (2007) 1458-1471
12. Kurniawan E.D., Wong M.H., Windle I., et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast-screening program. Ann Surg Oncol 15 (2008) 2542-2549
13. Olson T.P., Harter J., Muñoz A., et al. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 14 (2007) 2953-2960
14. Balch G.C., Mithani S.K., Simpson J.F., et al. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg 71 (2005) 22-27
15. Méndez J.E., Lamorte W.W., de las Morenas A., et al. Influence of breast cancer margin assessment method on the rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma. Am J Surg 192 (2006) 538-540
16. Zhu C., Palmer G., Breslin T., et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer using fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: a Monte Carlo-model-based approach. J Biomed Opt 13 (2008) 034015
17. Volynskaya Z., Haka A.S., Bechtel K.L., et al. Diagnosing breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt 13 (2008) 024012
18. Palmer G.M., and Ramanujam N. Monte Carlo-based inverse model for calculating tissue optical properties. Part I: theory and validation on synthetic phantoms. Appl Opt 45 (2006) 1062-1071
19. Palmer G.M., and Ramanujam N. Monte Carlo-based inverse model for calculating tissue optical properties. Part II: application to breast cancer diagnosis. Appl Opt 45 (2006) 1072-1078
20. Zhu C., Palmer G.M., Breslin T.M., et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: Comparison of a Monte Carlo versus partial least squares analysis based on feature extraction technique. Lasers Surg Med 38 (2006) 714-724
21. Huston T.L., Pigalarga R., Osborne M.P., et al. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 192 (2006) 509-512
22. Mourant J.R., Freyer J.P., Hielscher A.H., et al. Mechanisms of light scattering from biological cells relevant to non-invasive optical-tissue diagnostics. Appl Opt 37 (1998) 3586-3593
23. Picard R., and Cook D. Cross-validation of regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 387 (1997) 575-583
24. Keskek M., Kothari M., Ardehali B., et al. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30 (2004) 1058-1064
25. O'Sullivan M., Li T., and Freedman M.M. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14 (2007) 3133-3140
26. Soucy G., Bélanger J., Leblanc G., et al. Surgical margins in breast-conservation operations for invasive carcinoma: does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have an impact?. J Am Coll Surg 206 (2008) 1116-1121
27. Brown J.Q., Wilke L.G., Geradts J., et al. Quantitative optical spectroscopy: a robust tool for direct measurement of breast cancer vascular oxygenation and total hemoglobin content in vivo. Cancer Res 69 (2009) 2919-2926
28. Brown J.Q., Vishwanath K., Palmer G.M., et al. Advances in quantitative UV-visible spectroscopy for clinical and pre-clinical application in cancer. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20 (2009) 119-131
29. Schwarz R.A., Gao W., Redden W.C., et al. Noninvasive evaluation of oral lesions using depth-sensitive optical spectroscopy. Cancer 115 (2009) 1669-1679
30. Tanamai W., Chen C., Siavoshi S., et al. Diffuse optical spectroscopy measurements of healing in breast tissue after core biopsy: case study. J Biomed Opt 14 (2009) 014024
31. Graham R.A., Homer M.J., Katz J., et al. The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg 184 (2002) 89-93
32. Zavagno G., Goldin E., Mencarelli R., et al. Role of resection margins in patients treated with breast conservation surgery. Cancer 112 (2008) 1923-1931
33. Jacobs L.J. Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 15 (2008) 1271-1272
34. Bani M.R., Lux M.P., Heusinger K., et al. Factors correlating with re-excision after breast-conserving surgery. EJSO 35 (2009) 32-37
35. Luini A., Rososchansky J., Gatti G., et al. The surgical margin status after breast conserving surgery: discussion of an open issue. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113 (2009) 397-402
36. Waljee J.F., Hu E.S., Newman L.A., et al. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15 (2008) 1297-1303
37. Weber W.P., Engelberger S., Viehl C.T., et al. Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions. World J Surg 32 (2008) 2599-2606
38. Jacobson A.F., Asad J., Boolbol S.K., et al. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?. Am J Surg 196 (2008) 556-558
39. Cao D., Lin C., Woo S.H., et al. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcision. Am J Surg Pathol 29 (2005) 1625-1632