A novel method for assessing integration activities in landscape management

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 130, Issue , 2014, Pages 201-205

  Pearson, Leonie J ^a   Moon, Katie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Influence diagrams; Interviews; Mental models; Murray Darling Basin; Social ecological system

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE TESTING;

INFLUENCE DIAGRAM; INTERVIEWS; MENTAL MODEL; MURRAY-DARLING BASIN; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS;

INTEGRATION;

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LAND MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; NUMERICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

AUSTRALIA; MURRAY-DARLING BASIN;

EID: 84906945187     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Antrop M., Rogge E. Evaluation of the process of integration in a transdisciplinary landscape study in the Pajottenland (Flanders Belgium). Landscape Urban Planning 2006, 77:382-392.
2. Armstrong A., Jackson-Smith D. Forms and levels of integration: Evaluation of an interdisciplinary team-building project. Journal of Research Practice 2013, 9(1). Article M1. Retrieved from http://www.jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/335/297.
3. Batagelj V., Mrvar A. Pajek - program for large network analysis. Connections 1998, 21(2):47-57.
4. Bergmann M., Jahn T., Knobloch T., Krohn W., Phol C., Schramm E. Methods for trans disciplinary research: A primer for practice 2012, Campus Verlag GmbH, Germany.
5. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis 2002, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
6. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3(2):77-101.
7. Bryman A. Social research methods 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 3rd ed.
8. Carrington P.J., Scott J., Wasserman S. Models and methods in social network analysis 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory 2006, SAGE, London.
10. Denzau A.T., North D.C. Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos 47:3.Diffenbach, J. 1982. Influence diagrams for complex strategic issues. Strategic Management Journal 1994, 3:133-146.
11. Diffenbach J. Influence diagrams for complex strategic issues. Strategic Management Journal 1982, 3(2):133-146.
12. Enengel B., Muhar A., Penker M., Freyer B., Drlik S., Ritter R.R. Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development - An analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 105:106-117.
13. Fiol C.M.A.S Maps for managers: where are we? Where do we go from here?. Journal of Management Studies 1992, 29:267-285.
14. Fry G. Multifunctional landscapes-towards transdisciplinary research. Landscape Urban Planning 2001, 57:159-168.
15. Grammatikopoulou I., Pouta E., Salmiovirta M., Soini K. Heterogeneous preferences for agricultural landscape improvements in southern Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 107(2):181-191.
16. Hanneman R.A., Riddle M. Introduction to social network methods 2005, Department of Sociology at the University of California, Riverside, Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/, May 2013.
17. Huutoniemi K., Klein J.T., Bruunc H., Hukkinen J. Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy 2010, 39:79L 88.
18. Johnson-Laird P.N. Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness 1983, Harvard University Press/Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA/Cambridge.
19. Johnson-Laird P.N. Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107:18243-18250.
20. Jones N.A., Ross H., Lynam T., Perez P., Leitch A. Mental models: An interdiscplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society 2011, 16(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/.
21. Klein J. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 35:S116-S123.
22. Klein J.T. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice 1990, Wayne State University Press.
23. Klenke K. Qualitative research in the study of leadership 2008, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK.
24. Pahl-Wostl C. The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society 2006, 11:10.
25. Pretty J. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 12 2003, 302(5652):1912-1914.
26. Rokeach M. The nature of human values 1973, The Free Press, New York.
27. Shute V.J., Zapata-Rivera D. Using an evidence-based approach to assess mental models. Understanding models for learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Norbert M. Seel 2008, 23-41. Springer, New York, NY. D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, J.M. Spector (Eds.).
28. Southern A., Lovett A., O'Riordan T., Watkinson A. Sustainable landscape governance: Lessons from a catchment based study in whole landscape design. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 101(2):179-189.
29. Stokols D., Fuqua J., Gress J., Gress J., Harvey R., Phillips K., et al. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2003, 5(1S):S21-S39.
30. Stokols D., Harvey R., Gress J., Fuqua J., Phillips K. In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005, 28(2S.2):202-213.
31. Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: Potential and limitations. Delta Series 2. Wageningen 2003, 192.
32. Wynne B. Public understanding of science. Handbook of science and technology studies 1995, 361-388. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, E.J.C. Petersen, T. Pinch (Eds.).