DepecheMood: A lexicon for emotion analysis from crowd-annotated news

52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2014 - Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2014, Pages 427-433

  Staiano, Jacopo ^a   Guerini, Marco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b Trento RISE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

AFFECTIVE ANNOTATIONS; CLASSIFICATION TASKS; EMOTION ANALYSIS; EMOTION SCORES; HIGH-PRECISION; NEWS ARTICLES; SOCIAL MEDIA DATUM; STATE-OF-THE-ART PERFORMANCE;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84906922704     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p14-2070     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, and F. Sebastiani. 2010. SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of the Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 2200-2204, Valletta, Malta.
2. J. R. Bellegarda. 2010. Emotion analysis using latent affective folding and embedding. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 workshop on computational approaches to analysis and generation of emotion in text, pages 1-9. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. M. Bradley and P. Lang. 1999. Affective norms for english words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, University of Florida.
4. E. Cambria and A. Hussain. 2012. Sentic computing. Springer.
5. S. Chaffar and D. Inkpen. 2011. Using a heterogeneous dataset for emotion analysis in text. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pages 62-67. Springer.
6. M. De Choudhury, S. Counts, and M. Gamon. 2012. Not all moods are created equal! exploring human emotional states in social media. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).
7. P. Ekman and W. V. Friesen. 1971. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17:124-129.
8. A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani. 2006. SentiWordNet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of the Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 417-422, Genova, IT.
9. M. Guerini, O. Stock, and C. Strapparava. 2008. Valentino: A tool for valence shifting of natural language texts. In Proceedings of the Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Marrakech, Morocco.
10. M. Guerini, L. Gatti, and M. Turchi. 2013. Sentiment analysis: How to derive prior polarities from sentiwordnet. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1259-1269.
11. D. Z. Inkpen, O. Feiguina, and G. Hirst. 2006. Generating more-positive and more-negative text. In Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, pages 187-198. Springer.
12. B. Liu and L. Zhang. 2012. A survey of opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Mining Text Data, pages 415-463.
13. G. Mishne. 2005. Experiments with mood classification in blog posts. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2005 Workshop on Stylistic Analysis of Text for Information Access, volume 19.
14. S. M. Mohammad and P. D. Turney. 2013. Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3):436-465.
15. S. M. Mohammad. 2012. # Emotional tweets. In Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*Sem), pages 246-255. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. A. Neviarouskaya, H. Prendinger, and M. Ishizuka. 2007. Textual affect sensing for sociable and expressive online communication. In A. Paiva, R. Prada, and R. Picard, editors, Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, volume 4738 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 218-229. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
17. A. Neviarouskaya, H. Prendinger, and M. Ishizuka. 2009. Compositionality principle in recognition of fine-grained emotions from text. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).
18. A. Neviarouskaya, H. Prendinger, and M. Ishizuka. 2011. Affect analysis model: novel rule-based approach to affect sensing from text. Natural Language Engineering, 17(1):95.
19. G. Ozbal and C. Strapparava. 2012. A computational approach to the automation of creative naming. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
20. G. Ozbal, C. Strapparava, and M. Guerini. 2012. Brand pitt: A corpus to explore the art of naming. In Proceedings of the Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC).
21. G. Paltoglou, M. Thelwall, and K. Buckley. 2010. Online textual communications annotated with grades of emotion strength. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop of Emotion: Corpora for research on Emotion and Affect, pages 25-31.
22. B. Pang and L. Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2):1-135.
23. I. Piller. 2003. 10. advertising as a site of language contact. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23:170-183.
24. D. Quercia, J. Ellis, L. Capra, and J. Crowcroft. 2011. In the mood for being influential on twitter. Proceedings of IEEE SocialCom'11.
25. R. Snow, B. O'Connor, D. Jurafsky, and A. Ng. 2008. Cheap and fast - but is it good?: evaluating nonexpert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 254-263.
26. R. Socher, A. Perelygin, J. Y. Wu, J. Chuang, C. D. Manning, A. Y. Ng, and C. Potts. 2013. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1631-1642.
27. P. Stone, D. Dunphy, and M. Smith. 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT press.
28. C. Strapparava and R. Mihalcea. 2007. Semeval-2007 task 14: Affective text. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, pages 70-74. Association for Computational Linguistics.
29. C. Strapparava and R. Mihalcea. 2008. Learning to identify emotions in text. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 1556-1560. ACM.
30. C. Strapparava and A. Valitutti. 2004. WordNet-Affect: an affective extension of WordNet. In Proceedings of the Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 1083 - 1086, Lisbon, May.
31. P. Subasic and A. Huettner. 2001. Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 9(4):483-496.
32. M. Taboada, J. Brooke, M. Tofiloski, K. Voll, and M. Stede. 2011. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational linguistics, 37(2):267-307.
33. M. Turchi, M. Atkinson, A. Wilcox, B. Crawley, S. Bucci, R. Steinberger, and E. Van der Goot. 2012. Onts: optima news translation system. In Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 25-30. Association for Computational Linguistics.
34. J. R. Vittengl and C. S. Holt. 1998. A time-series diary study of mood and social interaction. Motivation and Emotion, 22(3):255-275.
35. S. Wang and C. Manning. 2012. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
36. A. B. Warriner, V. Kuperman, and M. Brysbaert. 2013. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 english lemmas. Behavior research methods, 45(4):1191-1207.
37. S. Whitehead and L. Cavedon. 2010. Generating shifting sentiment for a conversational agent. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pages 89-97, Los Angeles, CA, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
38. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and R. Hwa. 2004. Just how mad are you? finding strong and weak opinion clauses. In Proceedings of AAAI, pages 761-769.
39. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 347-354.