Sentiment analysis: How to derive prior polarities from SentiWordNet

EMNLP 2013 - 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1259-1269

  Guerini, Marco ^a   Gatti, Lorenzo ^a   Turchi, Marco ^b  

^a Trento RISE   (Italy)

^b FONDAZIONE BRUNO KESSLER   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLENDING; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA MINING;

LEARNING APPROACH; LEARNING FRAMEWORKS; PART OF SPEECH; REGRESSION AND CLASSIFICATION MODELS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SENTIWORDNET; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84926317499     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. E. Agirre, O.L. De Lacalle, C. Fellbaum, S.K. Hsieh, M. Tesconi, M. Monachini, P. Vossen, and R. Segers. 2010. Semeval-2010 task 17: All-words word sense disambiguation on a specific domain. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (IWSE '10), pages 75-80, Uppsala, Sweden.
2. S. Agrawal and T.J. Siddiqui. 2009. Using syntactic and contextual information for sentiment polarity analysis. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human (ICIS '09), pages 620-623, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
3. S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, and F. Sebastiani. 2010. Senti-WordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC '10), pages 2200-2204, Valletta, Malta.
4. M.M. Bradley and P.J. Lang. 1999. Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, University of Florida.
5. C.C. Chang and C.J. Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2:27:1-27:27.
6. F.R. Chaumartin. 2007. UPAR7: A knowledge-based system for headline sentiment tagging. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (IWSE '07), pages 422-425, Prague, Czech Republic.
7. ∗SEM): Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval '13), Volume 2, pages 466-470, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June.
8. T. Cohn and L. Specia. 2013. Modelling annotator bias with multi-task gaussian processes: An application to machine translation quality estimation. In Proceedings of the 51th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '13), pages 32-42, Sofia, Bulgaria.
9. K. Denecke. 2008. Accessing medical experiences and information. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Workshop on Mining Social Data (MSoDa '08), Patras, Greece.
10. K. Denecke. 2009. Are SentiWordNet scores suited for multi-domain sentiment classification? In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM '09), pages 32-37, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
11. A. Devitt and K. Ahmad. 2007. Sentiment polarity identification in financial news: A cohesion-based approach. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '07), pages 984-991, Prague, Czech Republic.
12. D.C. Dunphy, C.G. Bullard, and E.E.M. Crossing. 1974. Validation of the General Inquirer Harvard IV Dictionary. Paper presented at the Pisa Conference on Content Analysis.
13. A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani. 2006. SentiWordNet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC '06), pages 417-422, Genova, Italy.
14. L. Gatti and M. Guerini. 2012. Assessing sentiment strength in words prior polarities. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING '12), pages 361-370, Mumbai, India.
15. R. Giora. 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8:183-206.
16. M. Guerini, O. Stock, and C. Strapparava. 2008. Valentino: A tool for valence shifting of natural language texts. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC '08), pages 243-246, Marrakech, Morocco.
17. H.D. Lasswell and J.Z. Namenwirth. 1969. The Lasswell value dictionary. New Haven.
18. B. Liu and L. Zhang. 2012. A survey of opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Mining Text Data, pages 415-463.
19. N. Meinshausen and P. Bühlmann. 2010. Stability selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 72(4):417-473.
20. A. Neviarouskaya, H. Prendinger, and M. Ishizuka. 2009. Sentiful: Generating a reliable lexicon for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 3rd Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII '09), pages 363-368, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
21. A. Neviarouskaya, H. Prendinger, and M. Ishizuka. 2011. Affect analysis model: novel rule-based approach to affect sensing from text. Natural Language Engineering, 17(1):95.
22. G. Özbal and C. Strapparava. 2012. A computational approach to the automation of creative naming. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '12), pages 703-711, Jeju Island, Korea.
23. G. Özbal, C. Strapparava, and M. Guerini. 2012. Brand Pitt: A corpus to explore the art of naming. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC '12), pages 1822-1828, Istanbul, Turkey.
24. G. Paltoglou, M. Thelwall, and K. Buckley. 2010. Online textual communications annotated with grades of emotion strength. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop of Emotion: Corpora for research on Emotion and Affect (satellite of LREC '10), pages 25-31, Valletta, Malta.
25. B. Pang and L. Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2):1-135.
26. E. Pianta, C. Girardi, and R. Zanoli. 2008. The TextPro tool suite. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC '08), pages 2603-2607, Marrakech, Morocco.
27. I. Piller. 2003. Advertising as a site of language contact. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23:170-183.
28. T. Polajnar, S. Rogers, and M. Girolami. 2011. Protein interaction detection in sentences via gaussian processes: a preliminary evaluation. International journal of data mining and bioinformatics, 5(1):52-72.
29. L. Qu, C. Toprak, N. Jakob, and I. Gurevych. 2008. Sentence level subjectivity and sentiment analysis experiments in NTCIR-7 MOAT challenge. In Proceedings of the 7th NTCIR Workshop Meeting (NTCIR '08), pages 210-217, Tokyo, Japan.
30. C.E. Rasmussen and C.K.I. Williams. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press.
31. J. Shawe-Taylor and N. Cristianini. 2004. Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge university press.
32. J.K. Sing, S. Sarkar, and T.K. Mitra. 2012. Development of a novel algorithm for sentiment analysis based on adverb-adjective-noun combinations. In Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference on Emerging Trends and Applications in Computer Science (NCETACS '12), pages 38-40, Shillong, India.
33. P.J. Stone, D.C. Dunphy, and M.S. Smith. 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT press.
34. C. Strapparava and A. Valitutti. 2004. WordNet-Affect: an affective extension of WordNet. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC '04), pages 1083-1086, Lisbon, Portugal.
35. M. Taboada, J. Brooke, M. Tofiloski, K. Voll, and M. Stede. 2011. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational linguistics, 37(2):267-307.
36. T.T. Thet, J.C. Na, C.S.G. Khoo, and S. Shakthikumar. 2009. Sentiment analysis of movie reviews on discussion boards using a linguistic approach. In Proceedings of the 1st international CIKM workshop on Topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion (TSA '09), pages 81-84, Hong Kong.
37. S. Wang and C.D. Manning. 2012. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '12), pages 90-94, Jeju Island, Korea.
38. A.B. Warriner, V. Kuperman, and M. Brysbaert. 2013. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 english lemmas. Behavior research methods, pages 1-17.
39. J. Weston, S. Mukherjee, O. Chapelle, M. Pontil, T. Poggio, and V. Vapnik. 2000. Feature selection for SVMs. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS '00), pages 668-674, Denver, CO, USA.
40. C.K.I. Williams and D. Barber. 1998. Bayesian classification with gaussian processes. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 20(12):1342-1351.
41. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and R. Hwa. 2004. Just how mad are you? Finding strong and weak opinion clauses. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '04), pages 761-769, San Jose, CA, USA.
42. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP '05), pages 347-354, Vancouver, Canada.
43. A. Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING '00), pages 947-953, Saarbrücken, Germany.