Folding molecular dynamics simulations accurately predict the effect of mutations on the stability and structure of a vammin-derived peptide

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 118, Issue 34, 2014, Pages 10076-10084

  Koukos, Panagiotis I ^a   Glykos, Nicholas M ^a  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; BIOINFORMATICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

ISOLATED MUTANTS; LEVEL OF DETAIL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; NMR STRUCTURES; PHYSICAL REALITY; SIMULATION PROTOCOLS; SIMULATION TIME; STABLE STRUCTURES;

PEPTIDES;

PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; VAMMIN PROTEIN, VIPERA AMMODYTES AMMODYTES; VASCULOTROPIN A; VIPER VENOM;

CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; HYDROGEN BOND; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MUTATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MUTATION; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; THERMODYNAMICS; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR A; VIPER VENOMS;

EID: 84906832186     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: 15205207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp5046113     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Shaw, D. E.; Maragakis, P.; Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Dror, R. O.; Eastwood, M. P.; Bank, J. A.; Jumper, J. M.; Salmon, J. K.; Shan, Y.; Wriggers, W. Atomic-level Characterization of the Structural Dynamics of Proteins Science 2010, 330, 341-346
2. Gnanakaran, S.; García, A. E. Validation of an All-Atom Protein Force Field: From Dipeptides to Larger Peptides J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12555-12557
3. Dagget, V.; Kollman, P. A.; Kuntz, I. D. A Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Polyalanine: An Analysis of Equilibrium Motions and Helix-Coil Transitions Biopolymers 1991, 31, 1115-1134
4. Gnanakaran, S.; García, A. E. Helix-Coil Transition of Alanine Peptides in Water: Force Field Dependence on the Folded and Unfolded Structures Proteins 2005, 59, 773-782
5. Best, R. B.; Hummer, G. Optimized Molecular Dynamics Force Fields Applied to the Helix-Coil Transition of Polypeptides J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 9004-9015
6. Matthes, D.; de Groot, B. L. Secondary Structure Propensities in Peptide Folding Simulations: A Systematic Comparison of Molecular Mechanics Interaction Schemes Biophys. J. 2009, 97, 599-608
7. Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Maragakis, P.; Piana, S.; Eastwood, M. P.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. Systematic Validation of Protein Force Fields Against Experimental Data PloS One 2012, 7, e32131
8. Piana, S.; Klepeis, J. L.; Shaw, D. E. Assessing the Accuracy of Physical Models Used in Protein-folding Simulations: Quantitative Evidence from Long Molecular Dynamics Simulations Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2014, 24, 98-105
9. Kaur, H.; Sasidhar, Y. U. For the Sequence YKGQ, the Turn and Extended Conformational Forms Are Separated by Small Barriers and the Turn Propensity Persists Even at High Temperatures: Implications for Protein Folding J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 3850-3860
10. Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. How Fast-folding Proteins Fold Science 2011, 334, 517-520
11. Best, R. B. Atomistic Molecular Simulations of Protein Folding Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22, 52-61
12. Patapati, K. K.; Glykos, N. M. Three Force Fields' Views of the 310 Helix Biophys. J. 2011, 101, 1766-1771
13. Georgoulia, P. S.; Glykos, N. M. Using J-Coupling Constants for Force Field Validation: Application to Hepta-alanine J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 15221-15227
14. Hornak, V.; Abel, R.; Okur, A.; Strockbine, B.; Roitberg, A.; Simmerling, C. Comparison of Multiple Amber Force Fields and Development of Improved Protein Backbone Parameters Proteins 2006, 65, 712-725
15. Wickstrom, L.; Okur, A.; Simmerling, C. Evaluating the Performance of the ff99SB Force Field Based on NMR Scalar Coupling Data Biophys. J. 2009, 97, 853-856
16. Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Palmo, K.; Maragakis, P.; Klepeis, J. L.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. Improved Side-chain Torsion Potentials for the Amber ff99SB Protein Force Field Proteins 2010, 78, 1950-1958
17. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926-935
18. Koehl, P. Electrostatics Calculations: Latest Methodological Advances Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2006, 16, 142-151
19. Georgoulia, P. S.; Glykos, N. M. On the Foldability of Tryptophan-Containing Tetra- and Pentapeptides: An Exhaustive Molecular Dynamics Study J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 5522-5532
20. Patapati, K. K.; Glykos, N. M. Order through Disorder: Hyper-Mobile C-Terminal Residues Stabilize the Folded State of a Helical Peptide. A Molecular Dynamics Study PloS One 2010, 5, e15290
21. Patmanidis, I.; Glykos, N. M. As good as it gets? Folding Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the LytA Choline-binding Peptide Result to an Exceptionally Accurate Model of the Peptide Structure J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2013, 41, 68-71
22. Mirassou, Y.; Santiveri, C. M.; Pérez de Vega, M. J.; González-Muñiz, R.; Jiménez, M. A. Disulfide Bonds versus TrpTrp Pairs in Irregular Beta-hairpins: NMR Structure of Vammin Loop 3-derived Peptides as a Case Study ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 902-910
23. Hollingsworth, S. A.; Karplus, P. A. A Fresh Look at the Ramachandran Plot and the Occurrence of Standard Structures in Proteins Biomol. Concepts 2010, 1, 271-283
24. Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E., III; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J. The Amber Biomolecular Simulation Programs J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1668-1688
25. Zhang, C.; Ma, J. Enhanced Sampling and Applications in Protein Folding in Explicit Solvent J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 244101
26. Kale, L.; Skeel, R.; Bhandarkar, M.; Brunner, R.; Gursoy, A.; Krawetz, N.; Phillips, J.; Shinozaki, A.; Varadarajan, K.; Schulten, K. NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 151, 283-312
27. Glykos, N. M. CARMA: A Molecular Dynamics Analysis Program J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1765-1768
28. Koukos, P. I.; Glykos, N. M. grcarma: A Fully Automated Task-Oriented Interface for the Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 2310-2312
29. Frishman, D.; Argos, P. Knowledge-Based Protein Secondary Structure Assignment Proteins 1995, 23, 566-579
30. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD-Visual Molecular Dynamics J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33-38
31. Merritt, E. A.; Bacon, D. J. Raster3D Photorealistic Molecular Graphics Methods Enzymol. 1997, 277, 505-524
32. Koukos, P. I.; Glykos, N. M. On the Application of Good-Turing Statistics to Quantify Convergence of Biomolecular Simulations J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 209-217
33. Cho, S. S.; Levy, Y.; Wolynes, P. G. P versus Q: Structural reaction coordinates capture protein folding on smooth landscapes Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103, 586-591
34. Mu, Y.; Nguyen, P. H.; Stock, G. Energy Landscape of a Small Peptide Revealed by Dihedral Angle Principal Component Analysis Proteins 2005, 58, 45-52
35. Altis, A.; Nquyen, P. H.; Hegger, R.; Stock, G. Dihedral Angle Principal Component Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 244111
36. Boned, R.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Daura, X. Estimating the Temperature Dependence of Peptide Folding Entropies and Free Enthalpies from Total Energies in Molecular Dynamics Simulations Chem.-Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5039-5046