Tinnitus in men, mice (as well as other rodents), and machines

Hearing Research

Volumn 311, Issue , 2014, Pages 63-71

  Schaette, Roland ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RETIGABINE;

COCHLEA INJURY; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMPUTER MODEL; COUNSELING; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NOISE INJURY; NONHUMAN; PREVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RODENT; THERAPY; TINNITUS; TINNITUS RETRAINING THERAPY; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; CONDUCTION DEAFNESS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; EAR PLUG; MALE; OTOSCLEROSIS; PROPHYLAXIS; ANIMAL; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; DISEASE MODEL; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; MOUSE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRECTION OF HEARING IMPAIRMENT; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PERSONS WITH HEARING IMPAIRMENTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TINNITUS;

EID: 84906790571     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.12.004     Document Type: Review

References (123)

1. Adjamian P., Sereda M., Hall D.A. The mechanisms of tinnitus: perspectives from human functional neuroimaging. Hear Res. 2009, 253:15-31.
2. Adjamian P., Sereda M., Zobay O., Hall D.A., Palmer A.R. Neuromagnetic indicators of tinnitus and tinnitus masking in patients with and without hearing loss. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2012, 13:715-731.
3. Ahlf S., Tziridis K., Korn S., Strohmeyer I., Schulze H. Predisposition for and prevention of subjective tinnitus development. PLoS One 2012, 7:e44519.
4. Axelsson A., Ringdahl A. Tinnitus - a study of its prevalence and characteristics. Br. J. Audiol. 1989, 23:53-62.
5. Ayache D., Earally F., Elbaz P. Characteristics and postoperative course of tinnitus in otosclerosis. Otol. Neurotol. 2003, 24:48-51.
6. Barnea G., Attias J., Gold S., Shahar A. Tinnitus with normal hearing sensitivity: extended high-frequency audiometry and auditory-nerve brain-stem-evoked responses. Audiology 1990, 29:36-45.
7. Bast F., Mazurek B., Schrom T. Effect of stapedotomy on pre-operative tinnitus and its psychosomatic burden. Auris Nasus Lary. 2013, 40:530-533.
8. Bauer C.A., Brozoski T.J. Assessing tinnitus and prospective tinnitus therapeutics using a psychophysical animal model. J.Asso. Res. Otolaryngol. JARO 2001, 2:54-64.
9. Bauer C.A., Turner J.G., Caspary D.M., Myers K.S., Brozoski T.J. Tinnitus and inferior colliculus activity in chinchillas related to three distinct patterns of cochlear trauma. J.Neurosci. Res. 2008, 86:2564-2578.
10. Breakspear M., Roberts J.A., Terry J.R., Rodrigues S., Mahant N., Robinson P.A. Aunifying explanation of primary generalized seizures through nonlinear brain modeling and bifurcation analysis. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:1296-1313.
11. Brozoski T.J., Bauer C.A., Caspary D.M. Elevated fusiform cell activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of chinchillas with psychophysical evidence of tinnitus. J.Neurosci. 2002, 22:2383-2390.
12. Bruce I.C., Bajaj H.S., Ko J. Lateral-inhibitory-network models of tinnitus. 5th IFAC Symposium on Modelling and Control in Biomedical Systems 2003, 359-363. Melbourne, Australia.
13. Chrostowski M., Yang L., Wilson H.R., Bruce I.C., Becker S. Can homeostatic plasticity in deafferented primary auditory cortex lead to travelling waves of excitation?. J.Comput. Neurosci. 2011, 30:279-299.
14. Chung D.Y., Gannon R.P., Mason K. Factors affecting the prevalence of tinnitus. Audiology 1984, 23:441-452.
15. Davis B., Qiu W., Hamernik R.P. The use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the estimation of hearing and sensory cell loss in noise-damaged cochleas. Hear. Res. 2004, 187:12-24.
16. Dehmel S., Pradhan S., Koehler S., Bledsoe S., Shore S. Noise overexposure alters long-term somatosensory-auditory processing in the dorsal cochlear nucleus-possible basis for tinnitus-related hyperactivity?. J.Neurosci. 2012, 32:1660-1671.
17. Del Bo L., Forti S., Ambrosetti U., Costanzo S., Mauro D., Ugazio G., Langguth B., Mancuso A. Tinnitus aurium in persons with normal hearing: 55 years later. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2008, 139:391-394.
18. Dominguez M., Becker S., Bruce I., Read H. Aspiking neuron model of cortical correlates of sensorineural hearing loss: spontaneous firing, synchrony, and tinnitus. Neural Comput. 2006, 18:2942-2958.
19. Eggermont J.J. Hearing loss, hyperacusis, or tinnitus: what is modeled in animal research?. Hear. Res. 2013, 295:140-149.
20. Eggermont J.J., Roberts L.E. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27:676-682.
21. Engineer N.D., Riley J.R., Seale J.D., Vrana W.A., Shetake J.A., Sudanagunta S.P., Borland M.S., Kilgard M.P. Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature 2011, 470:101-104.
22. Epp B., Hots J., Verhey J.L., Schaette R. Increased intensity discrimination thresholds in tinnitus subjects with a normal audiogram. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012, 132:EL196-201.
23. Etchelecou M.C., Coulet O., Derkenne R., Tomasi M., Norena A.J. Temporary off-frequency listening after noise trauma. Hear. Res. 2011, 282:81-91.
24. Folmer R.L., Carroll J.R. Long-term effectiveness of ear-level devices for tinnitus. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2006, 134:132-137.
25. Forti S., Crocetti A., Scotti A., Costanzo S., Pignataro L., Ambrosetti U., Del Bo L. Tinnitus sound therapy with open ear canal hearing aids. B-Ent. 2010, 6:195-199.
26. Freyer F., Roberts J.A., Becker R., Robinson P.A., Ritter P., Breakspear M. Biophysical mechanisms of multistability in resting-state cortical rhythms. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:6353-6361.
27. Furman A.C., Kujawa S.G., Liberman M.C. Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. J.Neurophysiol. 2013, 110:577-586.
28. Gersdorff M., Nouwen J., Gilain C., Decat M., Betsch C. Tinnitus and otosclerosis. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2000, 257:314-316.
29. Gu J.W., Herrmann B.S., Levine R.A., Melcher J.R. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus. J Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2012, 13(6):819-833.
30. Gu J.W., Halpin C.F., Nam E.C., Levine R.A., Melcher J.R. Tinnitus, diminished sound-level tolerance, and elevated auditory activity in humans with clinically normal hearing sensitivity. J.Neurophysiol. 2010, 104:3361-3370.
31. Heffner H.E., Harrington I.A. Tinnitus in hamsters following exposure to intense sound. Hear. Res. 2002, 170:83-95.
32. Heffner H.E., Koay G. Tinnitus and hearing loss in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) exposed to loud sound. Behav. Neurosci. 2005, 119:734-742.
33. Heffner H.E., Heffner R.S. Behavioural tests for tinnitus in animals. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 2012, Springer, New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London. J.J. Eggermont, F.G. Zeng (Eds.).
34. Heller M.F., Bergman M. Tinnitus aurium in normally hearing persons. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1953, 62:73-83.
35. Henry J.A., Meikle M., Gilbert A. Audiometric correlates of tinnitus pitch: insights from the tinnitus data registry. VI. International Tinnitus Seminar 1999, 51-57. The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre, London. J. Hazell (Ed.).
36. Henry J.A., Dennis K.C., Schechter M.A. General review of tinnitus: prevalence, mechanisms, effects, and management. J.Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2005, 48:1204-1235.
37. Hoffman H.J., Reed G.W. Epidemiology of tinnitus. Tinnitus: Theory and Management 2004, 16-41. B.C. Decker, Hamilton, London. J.B. Snow (Ed.).
38. Jastreboff P.J., Brennan J.F., Coleman J.K., Sasaki C.T. Phantom auditory sensation in rats: an animal model for tinnitus. Behav. Neurosci. 1988, 102:811-822.
39. Kaltenbach J.A. Tinnitus: models and mechanisms. Hear. Res. 2011, 276:52-60.
40. Kaltenbach J.A., Zacharek M.A., Zhang J., Frederick S. Activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of hamsters previously tested for tinnitus following intense tone exposure. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 355:121-125.
41. Kaltenbach J.A., Rachel J.D., Mathog T.A., Zhang J., Falzarano P.R., Lewandowski M. Cisplatin-induced hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus and its relation to outer hair cell loss: relevance to tinnitus. J.Neurophysiol. 2002, 88:699-714.
42. Kehrle H.M., Granjeiro R.C., Sampaio A.L., Bezerra R., Almeida V.F., Oliveira C.A. Comparison of auditory brainstem response results in normal-hearing patients with and without tinnitus. Arch. Otolaryngol.-head Neck Surg. 2008, 134:647-651.
43. Kiani F., Yoganantha U., Tan C.M., Meddis R., Schaette R. Off-frequency listening in subjects with chronic tinnitus. Hear Res. 2013, 306:1-10.
44. Kompis M., Pelizzone M., Dillier N., Allum J., Demin N., Senn P. Tinnitus before and 6 months after cochlear implantation. Audiol. Neurootol. 2012, 17:161-168.
45. König O., Schaette R., Kempter R., Gross M. Course of hearing loss and occurrence of tinnitus. Hear. Res. 2006, 221:59-64.
46. Kremkow J., Aertsen A., Kumar A. Gating of signal propagation in spiking neural networks by balanced and correlated excitation and inhibition. J.Neurosci. 2010, 30:15760-15768.
47. Kujawa S.G., Liberman M.C. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss. J.Neurosci. 2009, 29:14077-14085.
48. Langers D.R., de Kleine E., van Dijk P. Tinnitus does not require macroscopic tonotopic map reorganization. Front Syst. Neurosci. 2012, 6:2.
49. Leaver A.M., Renier L., Chevillet M.A., Morgan S., Kim H.J., Rauschecker J.P. Dysregulation of limbic and auditory networks in tinnitus. Neuron 2011, 69:33-43.
50. Levine R.A. Somatic (craniocervical) tinnitus and the dorsal cochlear nucleus hypothesis. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 1999, 20:351-362.
51. Li S., Choi V., Tzounopoulos T. Pathogenic plasticity of Kv7.2/3 channel activity is essential for the induction of tinnitus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2013, 110:9980-9985.
52. Lima Ada S., Sanchez T.G., Bonadia Moraes M.F., Batezati Alves S.C., Bento R.F. The effect of timpanoplasty on tinnitus in patients with conductive hearing loss: a six month follow-up. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2007, 73:384-389.
53. Lobarinas E., Salvi R., Ding D. Insensitivity of the audiogram to carboplatin induced inner hair cell loss in chinchillas. Hear. Res. 2013, 302:113-120.
54. Lobarinas E., Hayes S.H., Allman B.L. The gap-startle paradigm for tinnitus screening in animal models: limitations and optimization. Hear. Res. 2013, 295:150-160.
55. Lockwood A.H., Salvi R.J., Burkard R.F. Tinnitus. N.Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347:904-910.
56. Longenecker R.J., Galazyuk A.V. Development of tinnitus in CBA/CaJ mice following sound exposure. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2011, 12:647-658.
57. Longenecker R.J., Galazyuk A.V. Methodological optimization of tinnitus assessment using prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex. Brain Res. 2012, 1485:54-62.
58. Lorenz I., Muller N., Schlee W., Hartmann T., Weisz N. Loss of alpha power is related to increased gamma synchronization-A marker of reduced inhibition in tinnitus?. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 453:225-228.
59. Luczak A., Bartho P., Harris K.D. Spontaneous events outline the realm of possible sensory responses in neocortical populations. Neuron 2009, 62:413-425.
60. Luczak A., Bartho P., Harris K.D. Gating of sensory input by spontaneous cortical activity. J.Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2013, 33:1684-1695.
61. Makary C.A., Shin J., Kujawa S.G., Liberman M.C., Merchant S.N. Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2011, 12:711-717.
62. McNeill C., Tavora-Vieira D., Alnafjan F., Searchfield G.D., Welch D. Tinnitus pitch, masking, and the effectiveness of hearing aids for tinnitus therapy. Int. J. Audiol. 2012, 51:914-919.
63. Meddis R., Lecluyse W., Clark N.R., Jurgens T., Tan C.M., Panda M.R., Brown G.J. Acomputer model of the auditory periphery and its application to the study of hearing. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013, 787:11-20.
64. Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear. 2004, 25:98-116.
65. Melcher J.R., Levine R.A., Bergevin C., Norris B. The auditory midbrain of people with tinnitus: abnormal sound-evoked activity revisited. Hear. Res. 2009, 257:63-74.
66. Middleton J.W., Kiritani T., Pedersen C., Turner J.G., Shepherd G.M., Tzounopoulos T. Mice with behavioral evidence of tinnitus exhibit dorsal cochlear nucleus hyperactivity because of decreased GABAergic inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2011, 108:7601-7606.
67. Moffat G., Adjout K., Gallego S., Thai-Van H., Collet L., Norena A.J. Effects of hearing aid fitting on the perceptual characteristics of tinnitus. Hear. Res. 2009, 254:82-91.
68. Moore B.C., Vinay S. The relationship between tinnitus pitch and the edge frequency of the audiogram in individuals with hearing impairment and tonal tinnitus. Hear. Res. 2010, 261:51-56.
69. Moore B.C., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcantara J.I. Atest for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br. J. Audiol. 2000, 34:205-224.
70. Mühlnickel W., Elbert T., Taub E., Flor H. Reorganization of auditory cortex in tinnitus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 1998, 95:10340-10343.
71. Mulders W.H., Robertson D. Hyperactivity in the auditory midbrain after acoustic trauma: dependence on cochlear activity. Neuroscience 2009, 164:733-746.
72. Mulders W.H., Robertson D. Progressive centralization of midbrain hyperactivity after acoustic trauma. Neuroscience 2011, 192:753-760.
73. Mulders W.H., Ding D., Salvi R., Robertson D. Relationship between auditory thresholds, central spontaneous activity, and hair cell loss after acoustic trauma. J.Comp. Neurol. 2011, 519:2637-2647.
74. Nicolas-Puel C., Faulconbridge R.L., Guitton M., Puel J.L., Mondain M., Uziel A. Characteristics of tinnitus and etiology of associated hearing loss: a study of 123 patients. Int. Tinnitus J. 2002, 8:37-44.
75. Norena A., Micheyl C., Chery-Croze S., Collet L. Psychoacoustic characterization of the tinnitus spectrum: implications for the underlying mechanisms of tinnitus. Audiol. Neurootol. 2002, 7:358-369.
76. Norena A.J. An integrative model of tinnitus based on a central gain controlling neural sensitivity. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35:1089-1109.
77. Norena A.J., Eggermont J.J. Enriched acoustic environment after noise trauma reduces hearing loss and prevents cortical map reorganization. J.Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2005, 25:699-705.
78. Norena A.J., Eggermont J.J. Enriched acoustic environment after noise trauma abolishes neural signs of tinnitus. Neuroreport 2006, 17:559-563.
79. Nosrati-Zarenoe R., Arlinger S., Hultcrantz E. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: results drawn from the Swedish national database. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007, 127:1168-1175.
80. Nowotny M., Remus M., Kossl M., Gaese B.H. Characterization of the perceived sound of trauma-induced tinnitus in gerbils. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 130:2827-2834.
81. Ortmann M., Muller N., Schlee W., Weisz N. Rapid increases of gamma power in the auditory cortex following noise trauma in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 33:568-575.
82. Parra L.C., Pearlmutter B.A. Illusory percepts from auditory adaptation. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:1632-1641.
83. Peltier E., Peltier C., Tahar S., Alliot-Lugaz E., Cazals Y. Long-term tinnitus suppression with linear octave frequency transposition hearing AIDS. PLoS One 2012, 7:e51915.
84. Punte A.K., Vermeire K., Hofkens A., De Bodt M., De Ridder D., Van de Heyning P. Cochlear implantation as a durable tinnitus treatment in single-sided deafness. Cochl. Implant. Int. 2011, 12(Suppl.1):S26-S29.
85. Rauschecker J.P., Leaver A.M., Muhlau M. Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus. Neuron 2010, 66:819-826.
86. Ritter P., Schirner M., McIntosh A.R., Jirsa V.K. The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging. Brain Connect 2013, 3:121-145.
87. Roberts L.E., Moffat G., Baumann M., Ward L.M., Bosnyak D.J. Residual inhibition functions overlap tinnitus spectra and the region of auditory threshold shift. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2008, 9:417-435.
88. Roberts L.E., Eggermont J.J., Caspary D.M., Shore S.E., Melcher J.R., Kaltenbach J.A. Ringing ears: the neuroscience of tinnitus. J.Neurosci. 2010, 30:14972-14979.
89. Ruttiger L., Ciuffani J., Zenner H.P., Knipper M. Abehavioral paradigm to judge acute sodium salicylate-induced sound experience in rats: a new approach for an animal model on tinnitus. Hear. Res. 2003, 180:39-50.
90. Ruttiger L., Singer W., Panford-Walsh R., Matsumoto M., Lee S.C., Zuccotti A., Zimmermann U., Jaumann M., Rohbock K., Xiong H., Knipper M. The reduced cochlear output and the failure to adapt the central auditory response causes tinnitus in noise exposed rats. PLoS One 2013, 8:e57247.
91. Salvi R.J., Ding D., Wang J., Jiang H.Y. Areview of the effects of selective inner hair cell lesions on distortion product otoacoustic emissions, cochlear function and auditory evoked potentials. Noise Health 2000, 2:9-26.
92. Sanchez T.G., Medeiros I.R., Levy C.P., Ramalho Jda R., Bento R.F. Tinnitus in normally hearing patients: clinical aspects and repercussions. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2005, 71:427-431.
93. Schaette R., Kempter R. Development of tinnitus-related neuronal hyperactivity through homeostatic plasticity after hearing loss: a computational model. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 23:3124-3138.
94. Schaette R., Kempter R. Development of hyperactivity after hearing loss in a computational model of the dorsal cochlear nucleus depends on neuron response type. Hear. Res. 2008, 240:57-72.
95. Schaette R., Kempter R. Predicting tinnitus pitch from patients' audiograms with a computational model for the development of neuronal hyperactivity. J.Neurophysiol. 2009, 101:3042-3052.
96. Schaette R., McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:13452-13457.
97. Schaette R., Kempter R. Computational models of neurophysiological correlates of tinnitus. Front Syst. Neurosci. 2012, 6:34.
98. Schaette R., Turtle C., Munro K.J. Reversible induction of phantom auditory sensations through simulated unilateral hearing loss. PLoS One 2012, 10.1371/journal.pone.0035238.
99. Schaette R., König O., Hornig D., Gross M., Kempter R. Acoustic stimulation treatments against tinnitus could be most effective when tinnitus pitch is within the stimulated frequency range. Hear. Res. 2010, 269:95-101.
100. Searchfield G.D., Kaur M., Martin W.H. Hearing aids as an adjunct to counseling: tinnitus patients who choose amplification do better than those that don't. Int. J. Audiol. 2010, 49:574-579.
101. Sederholm F., Swedberg M.D. Establishment of auditory discrimination and detection of tinnitus induced by salicylic acid and intense tone exposure in the rat. Brain Res. 2013, 1510:48-62.
102. Sedley W., Teki S., Kumar S., Barnes G.R., Bamiou D.E., Griffiths T.D. Single-subject oscillatory gamma responses in tinnitus. Brain 2012, 135:3089-3100.
103. Sereda M., Adjamian P., Edmondson-Jones M., Palmer A.R., Hall D.A. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in individuals with tinnitus. Hear. Res. 2013, 302:50-59.
104. Sereda M., Hall D.A., Bosnyak D.J., Edmondson-Jones M., Roberts L.E., Adjamian P., Palmer A.R. Re-examining the relationship between audiometric profile and tinnitus pitch. Int. J. Audiol. 2011, 50:303-312.
105. Sergeyenko Y., Lall K., Liberman M.C., Kujawa S.G. Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline. J.Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2013, 33:13686-13694.
106. Sobrinho P.G., Oliveira C.A., Venosa A.R. Long-term follow-up of tinnitus in patients with otosclerosis after stapes surgery. Int. Tinnitus J. 2004, 10:197-201.
107. Surr R.K., Kolb J.A., Cord M.T., Garrus N.P. Tinnitus Handicap inventory (THI) as a hearing aid outcome measure. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 1999, 10:489-495.
108. Taberner A.M., Liberman M.C. Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse. J.Neurophysiol. 2005, 93:557-569.
109. Tan C.M., Lecluyse W., McFerran D., Meddis R. Tinnitus and patterns of hearing loss. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. JARO 2013, 14:275-282.
110. Tass P.A., Popovych O.V. Unlearning tinnitus-related cerebral synchrony with acoustic coordinated reset stimulation: theoretical concept and modelling. Biol. Cybern. 2012, 106:27-36.
111. Tass P.A., Adamchic I., Freund H.J., von Stackelberg T., Hauptmann C. Counteracting tinnitus by acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2012, 30:137-159.
112. Trotter M.I., Donaldson I. Hearing aids and tinnitus therapy: a 25-year experience. J.Laryngol. Otol. 2008, 122:1052-1056.
113. Turner J.G., Brozoski T.J., Bauer C.A., Parrish J.L., Myers K., Hughes L.F., Caspary D.M. Gap detection deficits in rats with tinnitus: a potential novel screening tool. Behav. Neurosci. 2006, 120:188-195.
114. Turrigiano G.G. Homeostatic plasticity in neuronal networks: the more things change, the more they stay the same. Trends Neurosci. 1999, 22:221-227.
115. Van de Heyning P., Vermeire K., Diebl M., Nopp P., Anderson I., De Ridder D. Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2008, 117:645-652.
116. van Rossum M.C., Turrigiano G.G., Nelson S.B. Fast propagation of firing rates through layered networks of noisy neurons. J.Neurosci. 2002, 22:1956-1966.
117. Vogels T.P., Abbott L.F. Gating multiple signals through detailed balance of excitation and inhibition in spiking networks. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:483-491.
118. Weisz N., Moratti S., Meinzer M., Dohrmann K., Elbert T. Tinnitus perception and distress is related to abnormal spontaneous brain activity as measured by magnetoencephalography. PLoS Med. 2005, 2:e153.
119. Weisz N., Hartmann T., Dohrmann K., Schlee W., Norena A. High-frequency tinnitus without hearing loss does not mean absence of deafferentation. Hear. Res. 2006, 222:108-114.
120. Weisz N., Muller S., Schlee W., Dohrmann K., Hartmann T., Elbert T. The neural code of auditory phantom perception. J.Neurosci. 2007, 27:1479-1484.
121. Yang S., Weiner B.D., Zhang L.S., Cho S.J., Bao S. Homeostatic plasticity drives tinnitus perception in an animal model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2011, 108:14974-14979.
122. Young E.D., Davis K.A. Circuitry and function of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Integrative Functions in the Mammalian Auditory Pathway 2002, 121-157. Springer, New York. D. Oertel, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
123. Zeng C., Nannapaneni N., Zhou J., Hughes L.F., Shore S. Cochlear damage changes the distribution of vesicular glutamate transporters associated with auditory and nonauditory inputs to the cochlear nucleus. J.Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2009, 29:4210-4217.