Auditory evoked magnetic fields in individuals with tinnitus

Hearing Research

Volumn 302, Issue , 2013, Pages 50-59

  Sereda, Magdalena ^a,b   Adjamian, Peyman ^b   Edmondson Jones, Mark ^a   Palmer, Alan R ^b   Hall, Deborah A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC INSTITUTE OF HEARING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ABR; ANOVA; EEG; HL; MEG; PTA; SL; THI; TI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TINNITUS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; TINNITUS;

EID: 84879444344     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adjamian P., Sereda M., Hall D.A. The mechanisms of tinnitus: perspectives from human functional neuroimaging. Hear. Res. 2009, 253:15-31.
2. Adjamian P., Sereda M., Zobay O., Hall D.A., Palmer A.R. Neuromagnetic indicators of tinnitus and tinnitus masking in patients with and without hearing loss. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2012, 13:715-731.
3. Attias J., Urbach D., Gold S., Shemesh Z. Auditory event related potentials inchronic tinnitus patients with noise induced hearing loss. Hear. Res. 1993, 71:106-113.
4. Chait M., Simon J.Z., Poeppel D. Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications. Neuroreport 2004, 15:2455-2458.
5. Colding-Jørgensen E., Lauritzen M., Johnsen N.J., Mikkelsen K.B., Saemark K. On the evidence of auditory evoked magnetic fields as an objective measure of tinnitus. Electroencephaloar. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 83:322-327.
6. Dietrich V., Nieschalk M., Stoll W., Rajan R., Pantev C. Cortical reorganization in patients with high frequency cochlear hearing loss. Hear. Res. 2001, 158:95-101.
7. Eggermont J.J., Komiya H. Moderate noise trauma in juvenile cats results in profound cortical topographic map changes in adulthood. Hear. Res. 2000, 142:89-101.
8. Eggermont J.J., Roberts L.E. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27:676-682.
9. Fujioka T., Kakigi R., Gunji A., Takeshima Y. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones. Neuroscience 2002, 112:367-381.
10. Gabriel D., Veuillet E., Ragot R., Schwartz D., Ducorps A., Noreña A., Durrant J.D., Bonmartin A., Cotton F., Collet L. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 2004, 197:55-64.
11. Gerken G.M. Central tinnitus and lateral inhibition: an auditory brainstem model. Hear. Res. 1996, 97:75-83.
12. Godey B., Schwartz D., de Graaf J.B., Chauvel P., Liégeois-Chauvel C. Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:1850-1859.
13. Gu J.W., Halpin C.F., Nam E.-C., Levine R.A., Melcher J.R. Tinnitus, diminished sound-level tolerance, and elevated auditory activity in humans with clinically normal hearing sensitivity. J.Neurophysiol. 2010, 104:3361-3370.
14. Hallam R.S., McKenna L., Shurlock L. Tinnitus impairs cognitive efficiency. Int. J. Audiol. 2004, 43:218-226.
15. Harrison R.V., Nagasawa A., Smith D.W., Stanton S., Mount R.J. Reorganization of auditory cortex after neonatal high-frequency cochlear hearing loss. Hear. Res. 1991, 54:11-19.
16. Henry J.A., Meikle M.B. Pulsed versus continuous tones for evaluating the loudness of tinnitus. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 1999, 10:261-272.
17. Hoke M., Feldmann H., Pantev C., Liitkenhijner B., Lehnertz K. Objective evidence of tinnitus in auditory evoked magnetic fields. Hear. Res. 1989, 37:281-286.
18. Hoke E.S., Mühlnickel W., Ross B., Hoke M. Tinnitus and event-related activity of the auditory cortex. Audiol. Neurootol. 1998, 3:300-331.
19. Jacobson G.P., McCaslin D.L. Are-examination of the long latency N1 responses in patients with tinnitus. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 2003, 14:393-400.
20. Jacobson G.P., Ahmad B.K., Moran J., Newman C.W., Tepley N., Wharton J. Auditory evoked cortical magnetic field (M100-M200) measurements in tinnitus and normal groups. Hear. Res. 1991, 56:44-52.
21. Kadner A., Viirre E., Wester D.C., Walsh S.F., Hestenes J., Vankov A., Pineda J.A. Lateral inhibition in the auditory cortex: an EEG index of tinnitus?. NeuroReport 2002, 13:443-446.
22. Kanno A., Nakasato N., Fujita S., Seki K., Kawamura T., Ohtomo S., Fujiwara S., Yoshimoto T. Right hemispheric dominance in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 1996, 47:129-132.
23. Khalfa S., Dubal S., Veuillet E., Perez-Diaz F., Jouvent R., Collet L. Psychometric normalization of a hyperacusis questionnaire. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 2002, 64:436-442.
24. Kiang N.Y.S., Moxon F.C., Levine R.A. Auditory nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. Ciba Foundation Symposium on Sensorineural Hearing Loss 1969, 241-273. Churchill, London. G.E.W. Wolstenholme, J. Knight (Eds.).
25. Kimura M., Eggermont J.J. Effects of acute pure tone induced hearing loss on response properties in three auditory cortical fields in cat. Hear. Res. 1999, 135:146-162.
26. Langers D.R., van Dijk P., Beckes W.H. Lateralization, connectivity and plasticity in the human central auditory system. Neuroimage 2005, 28:490-499.
27. Langers D.R., van Dijk P. Mapping the tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex with minimally salient acoustic stimulation. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 10.1093/cercor/bhr282.
28. Lanting C.P., de Kleine E., van Dijk P. Neural activity underlying tinnitus generation: results from PET and fMRI. Hear. Res. 2009, 255:1-13.
29. Llinas R., Urbano F.J., Leznik E., Ramirez R.R., van Marle H.J. Rhythmic and dysrhythmic thalamocortical dynamics: GABA systems and the edge effect. Trends Neurosci. 2005, 28:325-333.
30. Mayhew S.D., Dirckx S.G., Niazy R.K., Iannetti G.D., Wise R.G. EEG signature of auditory activity correlate with simultaneously recorded fMRI responses in humans. Neuroimage 2010, 149:849-864.
31. Melcher J.R., Sigalovsky I.S., Guinan J.J., Levine R.A. Lateralized tinnitus studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging: abnormal inferior colliculus activation. J.Neurophysiol. 2000, 83:1058-1072.
32. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiol. 1987, 24:375-425.
33. Naka D., Kakigi R., Hoshiyama M., Yamasaki H., Okusa T., Koyama S. Structure of the auditory evoked magnetic fields during sleep. Neuroscience 1999, 93:573-583.
34. Newman C.W., Jacobson G.P., Spitzer J.B. Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1996, 122:143-148.
35. Noreña A.J., Cransac H., Chéry-Croze S. Towards an objectification by classification of tinnitus. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110:666-675.
36. Noreña A.J., Micheyl C., Chéry-Croze S., Collet L. Psychoacoustic characterization of the tinnitus spectrum: implications for the underlying mechanisms of tinnitus. Audiol. Neurootol. 2002, 7:358-369.
37. Noreña A.J. An integrative model of tinnitus based on a central gain controlling neural sensitivity. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35:1089-1109.
38. Noreña A.J., Tomita M., Eggermont J.J. Neural changes in cat auditory cortex after a transient pure-tone trauma. J.Neurophysiol. 2003, 90:2387-2401.
39. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
40. Pan T., Tyler R.S., Haihong J., Coelho C., Gehringer A.K., Gogel S.A. Therelationship between tinnitus pitch and the audiogram. Int. J. Audiol. 2009, 48:277-294.
41. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lütkenhöner B., Lehnertz K., Kumpf W. Tinnitus remission objectified by neuromagnetic measurements. Hear. Res. 1989, 40:261-264.
42. Pineda J.A., Moore R., Viirre E. Tinnitus treatment with customized sounds. Int. Tinnitus. J. 2008, 14:17-25.
43. Popelar J., Syka J., Berndt H. Effect of noise on auditory evoked responses in awake guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 1987, 26:239-247.
44. Popelar J., Grecova J., Rybalko N., Syka J. Comparison of noise-induced changes of auditory brainstem and middle latency response amplitudes in rats. Hear. Res. 2008, 245:82-91.
45. Rajan R., Irvine D.R.F., Wise L.Z., Heil P. Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. J.Comp. Neurol. 1993, 338:17-49.
46. Roberts T.P., Poeppel D. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. Neuroreport 1996, 7:1138-1140.
47. Roberts L.E., Moffat G., Bosnyak D.J. Residual inhibition functions in relation to tinnitus spectra and auditory threshold shift. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006, 556:27-33.
48. Roberts L.E., Moffat G., Baumann M., Ward L.M., Bosnyak D.J. Residual inhibition functions overlap tinnitus spectra and the region of auditory threshold shift. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2008, 9:417-435.
49. Robertson D., Irvine D.R.F. Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with parietal unilateral deafness. J.Comput. Neuro 1989, 282:456-471.
50. Salvi R.J., Wang J., Ding D. Auditory plasticity and hyperactivity following cochlear damage. Hear. Res. 2000, 147:261-274.
51. Schaette R., Kempter R. Development of tinnitus-related neuronal hyperactivity through homeostatic plasticity after hearing loss: a computational model. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 23:3124-3138.
52. Schaette R., Kempter R. Developmental hyperactivity after hearing loss in a computational model of the dorsal cochlear nucleus depends on neuron response type. Hear. Res. 2008, 240:57-72.
53. Schaette R., Kempter R. Predicting tinnitus pitch from patients' audiograms with a computational model for the development of neuronal hyperactivity. J.Neurophysiol. 2009, 101:3042-3052.
54. Schaette R., McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:13452-13457.
55. Sereda M., Hall D.A., Bosnyak D.J., Edmondson-Jones M., Roberts L.E., Adjamian P., Palmer A.R. Re-examining the relationship between audiometric profile and tinnitus pitch. Int. J. Audiol. 2011, 50:303-312.
56. Sun W., Zhang L., Lu J., Yang G., Laundrie E., Salvi R. Noise exposure-induced enhancement of auditory cortex response and changes in gene expression. Neuroscience 2008, 156:374-380.
57. Syka J., Rybalko N. Threshold shifts and enhancement of cortical evoked responses after noise exposure in rats. Hear. Res. 2000, 139:59-68.
58. Syka J., Rybalko N., Popelar J. Enhancement of the auditory cortex evoked responses in awake guinea pigs after noise exposure. Hear. Res. 1994, 78:158-168.
59. Talavage T.M., Sereno M.I., Melcher J.R., Ledden P.J., Rosen B.R., Dale A.M. Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity. J.Neurophysiol. 2004, 91:1282-1296.
60. Vernon J.A. Patophysiology of tinnitus: a special case - hyperacusis and a proposed treatment. Am. J. Otol. 1987, 8:201-202.
61. Weisz N., Wienbruch C., Dohrmann K., Elbert T. Neuromagnetic indicators of auditory cortical reorganization of tinnitus. Brain 2005, 128:2722-2731.