The use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the estimation of hearing and sensory cell loss in noise-damaged cochleas

Hearing Research

Volumn 187, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 12-24

  Davis, Bob ^a   Qiu, Wei ^a   Hamernik, Roger P ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Noise induced hearing loss; Otoacoustic emission; Sensory cell loss

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; AUDITORY THRESHOLD SHIFT; BRAIN STEM; CELL LOSS; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEA INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HAIR CELL; HISTOLOGY; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; MEASUREMENT; NOISE; NOISE INJURY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSORY NERVE CELL;

EID: 0347123653     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00339-3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ahroon W.A., Hamernik R.P., Davis R.I. Complex noise exposures: An energy analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;997-1006.
2. Attias, J., Horovitz, G., El-Hatib, N., Nageris, B., 2001. Detection and clinical diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions. In: Henderson, D., Prasher, D., Kopke, R., Salvi, R., Hamernik, R.P. (Eds.), Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Basic Mechanisms, Prevention and Control. Noise Research Networks Publications, London, pp. 429-441.
3. Avan, P., Bonfils, P., Mom, T., 2001. Correlations among distortion product otoacoustic emissions, thresholds and sensory cell impairment. In: Henderson, D., Prasaher, D., Kopke, R., Salvi, R., Hamernik, R.P (Eds.), Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Basic Mechanisms, Prevention and Control. Noise Research Networks Publications, London, pp. 411-427.
4. Blakeslee E.A., Hynson K., Hamernik R.P., Henderson D. Asymptotic threshold shift in chinchillas exposed to impulse noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63:1978;876-882.
5. Boerge P., Janssen T. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:2002;1810-1818.
6. Brown A.M. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: A comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs, and gerbils. Hear. Res. 31:1987;25-38.
7. Brown A.M., McDowell B., Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear. Res. 42:1989;143-156.
8. Canlon B., Marklund K., Borg E. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss and forward masking tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1993;3232-3243.
9. Eddins A.C., Zuskov M., Salvi R. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure. Hear. Res. 127:1999;119-128.
10. Eldredge D.H., Miller J.D., Bohne B.A. A frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69:1981;1091-1095.
11. Emmerich E., Richter F., Reinhold U., Linss V., Linss W. Effects of industrial noise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and hair cell loss of the cochlea - long term experiments in awake guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 148:2000;9-17.
12. Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Bergman B.M., Beauchaine K.L. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1993;2639-2648.
13. Gorga M.P., Stover L., Neely S.T. The use of cumulative distributions to determine critical values and levels of confidence for clinical distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;968-977.
14. Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Ohlrich B., Hoover B., Redner J., Peters J. From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and hearing loss. Ear Hear. 18:1997;440-455.
15. 1 are used to predict auditory status. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:2000;2128-2135.
16. Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Dorn P.A., Hoover B. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:2003;3275-3284.
17. Hamernik R.P., Qiu W. Correlations among evoked potential thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell loss following various noise exposures in the chinchilla. Hear. Res. 150:2000;245-257.
18. Hamernik R.P., Patterson J.H., Turrentine G.A., Ahroon W.A. The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds. Hear. Res. 38:1989;199-212.
19. Hamernik R.P., Ahroon W.A., Lei S.F. The cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the normal and noise-damaged chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;1003-1012.
20. Hamernik R.P., Ahroon W.A., Jock J.M., Bennett J.A. Noise-induced threshold shift dynamics measured with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials in chinchillas with inner hair cell deficient cochleas. Hear. Res. 118:1998;73-82.
21. Hamernik R.P., Qiu W., Davis B. The effects of the amplitude distribution of equal energy exposures on noise-induced hearing loss: The kurtosis metric. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:2003;386-395.
22. Harding G.W., Bohne B.A., Ahmad M. DPOAE level shifts and ABR threshold shifts compared to detailed analysis of histopathological damage from noise. Hear. Res. 174:2002;158-171.
23. Henderson D., Hamernik R.P., Woodford C., Sitler R.W., Salvi R. Evoked-response audibility curve of the chinchilla. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54:1973;1099-1101.
24. Hofstetter P., Ding D., Powers N., Salvi R.J. Quantitative relationship of carboplatin dose to magnitude of inner and outer hair cell loss and the reduction in distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude in chinchillas. Hear. Res. 112:1997;199-215.
25. Kimberley B.P., Hernandi I., Lee A.M., Brown D.K. Predicting pure tone thresholds in normal and hearing-impaired ears with distortion product emissions and age. Ear Hear. 15:1994;199-209.
26. Le Calvez S., Avan P., Gilain L., Romand R. CD1 hearing-impaired mice. I: Distortion product otoacosutic emission levels, cochlear function and morphology. Hear. Res. 120:1998;37-50.
27. Martin G.K., Jassir D., Stagner B.B., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of disrotion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:1998;972-983.
28. Mills D. Differential responses to acoustic damage and furosimide in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission measures. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:2003;914-924.
29. Salvi R.J., Ahroon W.A., Perry J.W., Gunnarson A.D., Henderson D. Comparison of psychophysical and evoked-potential tuning curves in the chinchilla. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 3:1982;408-416.
30. Schuknecht H.F. Lesions of the organ of corti. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 57:1953;366-383.
31. Stover L., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;956-967.
32. Subramaniam M., Salvi R.J., Sponger V.P., Henderson D., Powers N.L. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Hear. Res. 74:1994;204-216.