Frequent Contributors Within U.S. Newspaper Comment Forums: An Examination of Their Civility and Information Value

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1314-1328

  Blom, Robin ^a   Carpenter, Serena ^b   Bowe, Brian J ^b   Lange, Ryan ^c  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

civility; comment forums; diversity; frequent contributors; journalism; news; online discussion; public sphere

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906751356     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764214527094     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anderson R.,Dardenne R.,Killenberg G. M.The American newspaper as the public conversational commons.Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 1996;11:159-165.
2. Carpenter S.U.S. online newspaper and online citizen journalism publications: A comparison of content diversity.New Media & Society. 2010;12:1064-1084.
3. Carpenter S.,Blom R.News with a view: Journalism beyond objectivity. St. John B.Johnson K. A., ed. Jefferson, NC: McFarland; 2012:116-132.
4. Chae Y. G. An aspect of the culture of the public sphere in U.S.: The analysis of online public forums in local online newspapers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association; 2009New York, NY; 2009.
5. Chung D. S.Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008;13:658-697.
6. Ciofalo A.,Traverso K.Does the op-ed page have a chance to become a public forum?.Newspaper Research Journal. 1994;15:51-63.
7. A free and responsible press: A general report on mass communication: newspapers, radio, motion pictures, magazines, and books. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1947:.
8. Connolly T.,Jessup L. M.,Valacich J. S.Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups.Management Science. 1990;36:689-703.
9. Davis R.The web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1999:.
10. Delli Carpini M. X.,Cook F. L.,Jacobs L. R.Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature.Annual Review of Political Science. 2004;7:315-344.
11. Eveland W. P.,Morey A. C.,Hutchens M. J.Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective.Journal of Communication. 2011;61:1082-1103.
12. Ferber P.,Foltz F.,Pugliese R.Community networks and public participation: A forum for civic engagement or a platform for ranting irate malcontent?.Bulletin of Science Technology & Society. 2006;26 (5): 388-397.
13. Freeman S.Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment.Philosophy and Public Affairs. 2000;29:371-418.
14. Habermas J.The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1989:.
15. Habermas J.Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998:.
16. Haythornthwaite C.,Wellman B.Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization.Journal of American Society for Information Science. 1998;49 (12): 1101-1114.
17. Hibbings J. R.,Theiss-Morse E.Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
18. Hill K. A.,Hughes J. A.Computer-mediated political communication: The USENET and political communities.Political Communication. 2001;14 (1): 3-27.
19. Himelboim I.Civil society and online political discourse: The network structure of unrestricted discussions.Communication Research. 2010;38 (5): 634-659.
20. Himelboim I.,Gleave E.,Smith M.Discussion catalysts in online political discussions: Content importers and conversation starters.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2009;14:771-789.
21. Ho S. S.,McLeod D. M.Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication.Communication Research. 2008;35 (2): 190-207.
22. Hornsey M. J.,Majkut L.,Terry D. J.,McKimmie B. M.On being loud and proud: Non-conformity and counter-conformity to group norms.British Journal of Social Psychology. 2003;42:319-335.
23. Howard P.Castells and the media. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press; 2011:.
24. Howley K. Community media and the public sphere. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association; 2007San Francisco, CA; 2007.
25. Hujanen J.,Pietikäinen S.Interactive uses of journalism: Crossing between technological potential and you people's news-using practices.New Media & Society. 2004;6:383-401.
26. Iyengar S.Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1994:.
27. JansenH. J.KoopR. (2005). Pundits, ideologues, and ranters: The British Columbia election online. Canadian Journal of Communication, 30(4). Retrieved from http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/1483/1601.
28. Karppinen K.Against naive pluralism in media politics: On the implications of the radical-pluralist approach to the public sphere.Media, Culture & Society. 2007;29:495-508.
29. Kim J.,Wyatt R. O.,Katz E.News, talk, opinion, and participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy.Political Communication. 1999;16 (4): 361-385.
30. Koop R.,Jansen H. J.Political blogs and blogrolls in Canada: Forums for democratic deliberation?.Social Science Computer Review. 2009;27 (2): 155-173.
31. Kovach B.,Rosenstiel T.The elements of journalism. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press; 2007:.
32. LightA.RogersY. (1999). Conversation as publishing: The role of news forums on the web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/light.html.
33. McDevitt M.,Kiouis S.,Wahl-Jorgensen K.Spiral of moderation: Opinion expression in computer-mediated discussion.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2003;15 (4): 454-470.
34. McLure-Wasko M.,Faraj S.Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice.MIS Quarterly. 2005;29 (1): 35-57.
35. Mitchelstein E.,Boczkowski P. J.Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production.Journalism. 2009;10 (5): 562-586.
36. Moe H.Dissemination and dialogue in the public sphere: A case for public service media online.Media, Culture & Society. 2008;30:319-336.
37. Mutz D.Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice.American Political Science Review. 2002;96 (2): 111-126.
38. Nielsen C.Newspaper journalists support online comments.Newspaper Research Journal. 2012;33 (1): 86-100.
39. Noelle-Neumann E.The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion.Journal of Communication. 1974;24 (2): 43-51.
40. Noelle-Neumann E.The spiral of silence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1993:.
41. Papacharissi Z.The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere.New Media & Society. 2002;4:9-27.
42. Papacharissi Z.Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion group.New Media & Society. 2004;6:259-283.
43. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2002). Internet activities. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/chart.asp?img=Internet_Activities.jpg.
44. Reinig B. A.,Megias R. J.The effects of national culture and anonymity on flaming and criticalness in GSS-supported discussions.Small Group Research. 2004;35 (4): 698-723.
45. Robinson S.Traditionalists vs. convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist-audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites.Convergence. 2010;16:125-143.
46. RosenbergS. W. (2004). Reconstructing the concept of democratic deliberation (working paper). Retrieved from the Center for the Study of Democracy, UC Irvine, website: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rd8m486#page-2.
47. Schild S.,Oren K.The party line online: An oligarchy of opinion on a public affairs listserv.Journalism & Communication Monographs. 2005;7 (1): 5-47.
48. Schneider S. M.Creating a democratic public sphere through political discussion: A case study of abortion conversation on the Internet.Social Science Computer Review. 1996;14:373-393.
49. Schultz T.Mass media and the concept of interactivity: An exploratory study of online forums and reader email.Media, Culture & Society. 2000;22 (2): 205-221.
50. Shah D. V.,Cho J.,Eveland W. P.,Kwak N.Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation.Communication Research. 2005;32 (5): 531-565.
51. Sinekopova G. V.Building the public sphere: Bases and biases.Journal of Communication. 2006;56 (3): 505-522.
52. Singer J. B.Stepping back from the gate: Online newspaper editors and the co-production of content in campaign 2004.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2006;83 (2): 265-280.
53. Singer J. B.Separate spaces: Discourse about the 2007 Scottish elections on a national newspaper web site.International Journal of Press/Politics. 2009;14:477-496.
54. Singer J. B.,Ashman I."Comment is free, but facts are sacred": User-generated content and ethical constructs at the Guardian.Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 2009;24:3-21.
55. Skitka L. J.,Bauman C. W.,Sargis E. G.Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;88 (6): 895-917.
56. Sparks C.Editorial.Media, Culture & Society. 1989;11:131-134.
57. Splichal S.In search of a strong European public sphere: Some critical observations on conceptualizations of publicness and the (European) public sphere.Media, Culture & Society. 2006;28:695-714.
58. St. Cyr C.,Carpenter S.,Lacy S.Internet competition and U.S. newspaper city government coverage: Testing the Lowrey and Mackay model of occupational competition.Journalism Practice. 2010;4 (4): 507-522.
59. Stromer-Galley J.New voices in the public sphere: A comparative analysis of interpersonal and online political talk.Public. 2002;9 (2): 23-42.
60. Stromer-Galley J.Measuring deliberation's content: A coding scheme.Journal of Public Deliberation. 2007;3 (1): 1-35.
61. Sulkin T.,Simon F.Habermas in the lab: A study of deliberation in an experimental setting.Political Psychology. 2001;22:809-826.
62. Thompson D. F.Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science.Annual Review of Political Science. 2008;11:497-520.
63. TurnerC. T.SmithM. A.FisherD.WelserH. T. (2005). Picturing Usenet: Mapping computer-mediated collective action. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/turner.html.
64. Wahl-Jorgensen K.Ensuring richness and diversity of representation in the public sphere: Mass media as forums for democratic debate.Journal of the Northwest Communication Association. 1999;27:24-52.
65. WelserH. T.GleaveE.FisherD.SmithM. (2007). Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Science, 8. Retrieved from http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume8/Welser/.
66. Wheatley S.Deliberative democracy and minorities.European Journal of International Law. 2003;14 (3): 507-527.
67. Zhou X.,Chan Y.,Peng Z.Deliberativeness of the Guangzhou Daily website.Journalism Studies. 2008;9 (5): 759-770.