Linking tissues to phenotypes using gene expression profiles

Database

Volumn 2014, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Oellrich, Anika ^a   Smedley, Damian ^a  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; INTERNET; MOUSE; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMALS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENOME; HUMANS; INTERNET; MICE; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PHENOTYPE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84906564575     PISSN: 17580463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/database/bau017     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Smedley, D., Oellrich, A., Köhler, S. et al. (2013) PhenoDigm: analyzing curated annotations to associate animal models with human diseases. Database (Oxford), 2013, bat025.
2. Washington, N.L., Haendel, M.A., Mungall, C.J. et al. (2009) Linking human diseases to animal models using ontology-based phenotype annotation. PLoS Biol., 7, e1000247.
3. Keane, T.M., Goodstadt, L., Danecek, P. et al. (2011) Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature., 477, 289-294.
4. White, J.K., Gerdin, A.K., Karp, N.A. et al. (2013) Genome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes. Cell., 154, 452-464.
5. Chen, C.K., Mungall, C.J., Gkoutos, G.V. et al. (2012) MouseFinder: candidate disease genes from mouse phenotype data. Hum. Mutat., 33, 858-866.
6. Schofield, P.N., Hoehndorf, R. and Gkoutos, G.V. (2012) Mouse genetic and phenotypic resources for human genetics. Hum. Mutat., 33, 826-836.
7. Blake, J.A., Bult, C.J., Kadin, J.A. et al. (2011) The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): premier model organism resource for mammalian genomics and genetics. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D842-D848.
8. Koscielny, G., Yaikhom, G., Iyer, V. et al. (2014) The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium Web Portal, a unified point of access for knockout mice and related phenotyping data. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D802-D809.
9. Hoehndorf, R., Oellrich, A., Rebholz-Schuhmann, D. et al. (2012) Linking PharmGKB to phenotype studies and animal models of disease for drug repurposing. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 2012, 388-399.
10. Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N. et al. (2011) Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature., 473, 337-342.
11. Papatheodorou, I., Ziehm, M., Wieser, D. et al. (2012) Using answer set programming to integrate RNA expression with signalling pathway information to infer how mutations affect ageing. PLoS One, 7, e50881.
12. Wu, C., Wu, C., Orozco, C. et al. (2009) BioGPS: an extensible and customizable portal for querying and organizing gene annotation resources. Genome Biol., 10, R130.
13. Hoehndorf, R. et al. (2014) Analyzing gene expression data in mice with the Neuro Behavior Ontology. Mamm. Genome 1-9.
14. Dobrin, R., Zhu, J., Molony, C. et al. (2009) Multi-tissue coexpression networks reveal unexpected subnetworks associated with disease. Genome Biol., 10, R55.
15. Robinson, P.N., Köhler, S., Oellrich, A. et al. (2013) Improved exome prioritization of disease genes through cross species phenotype comparison. Genome Res., 24, 340-348.
16. McCall, M.N., Uppal, K., Jaffee, H.A. et al. (2011) The Gene Expression Barcode: leveraging public data repositories to begin cataloging the human and murine transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D1011-D1015.
17. Morgan, H., Michelle, S. and Mallon, A.M. (2012) Accessing and mining data from large-scale mouse phenotyping projects. Int. Rev. Neurobiol., 104, 47-70.
18. Zilliox, M.J. and Irizarry, R.A. (2007) A gene expression bar code for microarray data. Nat. Methods., 4, 911-913.
19. Hayamizu, T.F., Mangan, M., Corradi, J.P. et al. (2005) The adult mouse anatomical dictionary: a tool for annotating and integrating data. Genome Biol., 6, R29.
20. Mungall, C.J., Gkoutos, G.V., Smith, C.L. et al. (2010) Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species. Genome Biol., 11, R2.
21. Mungall, C.J., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G.V. et al. (2012) Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biol., 13, R5.
22. Prüfer, K., Muetzel, B., Do, H.H. et al. (2007) FUNC: a package for detecting significant associations between gene sets and ontological annotations. BMC Bioinformatics., 8, 41.
23. Ashburner, M., Ball, C.A., Blake, J.A. et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet., 25, 25-29.
24. Kumar, A., Smith, B. and Borgelt, C. (2004) Dependence relationships between Gene Ontology terms based on TIGR gene product annotations. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Computational Terminology (CompuTerm 2004).
25. Manda, P., Ozkan, S., Wang, H. et al. (2012) Cross-Ontology multilevel association rule mining in the Gene Ontology. PLoS One, 7, e47411.
26. Burgun, A., Bodenreider, O., Aurby, M. et al. (2004) Dependence relations in Gene Ontology: A preliminary study. In: Workshop on The Formal Architecture of the Gene Ontology-Leipzig, May 28-29, 2004, Germany.
27. van Vooren, S., Thienpont, B., Menten, B. et al. (2007) Mapping biomedical concepts onto the human genome by mining literature on chromosomal aberrations. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, 2533-2543.
28. Croset, S., Overington, J.P. and Rebholz-Schuhmann, D. (2013) Brain: biomedical knowledge manipulation. Bioinformatics., 29, 1238-1239.
29. Kazakov, Y., Markus, K. and František, S. (2012) ELK reasoner: architecture and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the OWL Reasoner Evaluation Workshop (ORE'12), Vol. 858.
30. Ewens, K.G., Kanetsky, P.A., Richards-Yutz, J. et al. (2013) Genomic profile of 320 uveal melanoma cases: chromosome 8p-loss and metastatic outcome. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 54, 5721-5729.
31. Meynard, D., Babitt, J.L. and Lin, H.Y. (2014) The liver: conductor of systemic iron regulation. Blood., 123, 168-176.