Spectral reduction factors evaluation for seismic assessment of frame buildings

Engineering Structures

Volumn 77, Issue , 2014, Pages 129-142

  Monteiro, Ricardo ^a,b   Marques, Mário ^b   Adhikari, Gopal ^c   Casarotti, Chiara ^c   Pinho, Rui ^d  

^a SCUOLA UNIVERSITARIA SUPERIORE IUSS PAVIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR TRAINING AND RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING EUCENTRE   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adaptive capacity spectrum method; Damping; Ductility; Frame buildings; Spectral reduction factors

Indexed keywords

CONNECTORS (STRUCTURAL); DAMPING; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DUCTILITY;

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; FRAME BUILDINGS; HYSTERETIC ENERGY DISSIPATIONS; MULTIPLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM; NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURE; SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS; SPECTRAL REDUCTIONS; STRUCTURAL ENERGIES; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT;

BUILDINGS; DAMPING;

BUILDING; DAMPING; DUCTILITY; ENERGY DISSIPATION; SPECTRUM; STATIC RESPONSE; BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; NONLINEARITY; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84906501438     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.041     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ACI. American Concrete Institute - Earthquake Effects on Reinforced Concrete Structures. SP-84. US-Japan Research. Detroit; 1984.
2. Akkar S.D., Metin A. Assessment of improved nonlinear static procedures in FEMA 440. J Struct Eng ASCE 2007, 133(9):1237-1246.
3. Akkar S.D., Miranda E. Statistical evaluation of approximate methods for estimating maximum deformation demands on existing structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 2005, 131(1):160-172.
4. Antoniou S., Pinho R. Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 2004, 8(5):643-661.
5. Applied Technology Council. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. ATC-40 Report. Volumes 1 and 2, ATC, California, USA; 1996.
6. Applied Technology Council. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Rep. No. FEMA-440, Washington, DC, USA; 2005.
7. Bento R., Bhatt C., Pinho R. Using nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of the 3D irregular SPEAR building. Earthq Struct 2010, 1(2):177-195.
8. Building Seismic Safety Council. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 273 (Guidelines) and FEMA 274 (commentary), Washington DC, USA; 1997.
9. Building Seismic Safety Council. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356, Washington DC, USA; 2000.
10. Borzi B., Calvi G.M., Elnashai A.S., Faccioli E., Bommer J.J. Inelastic spectra for displacement-based seismic design. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2001, 21:47-61.
11. Carvalho E, Coelho E, Campos-Costa A. Preparation of the full-scale tests on reinforced concrete frames. Characteristics of the test specimens, materials and testing conditions, ICONS Report, Innovative Seismic Design Concepts for New and Existing Structures, European TMR Network, LNEC; 1999.
12. Casarotti C., Pinho R. An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action. Bull Earthq Eng 2007, 5(3):377-390.
13. Casarotti C., Monteiro R., Pinho R. Verification of spectral reduction factors for seismic assessment of bridges. Bull New Zealand Soc Earthq Eng 2009, 42(2).
14. Chopra A.K., Chintanapakdee C. Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems. J Struct Eng ASCE 2004, 130(9):1309-1319.
15. Comité Européen de Normalisation. Eurocode 8 - Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1 - General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium; 2004.
16. Cosenza E. Il comportamento sismico di edifici in c.a. progettati per carichi verticali 2000, CNR-Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti, Roma, (in Italian).
17. Dwairi H.M., Kowalsky M.J., Nau J.M. Equivalent damping in support of direct displacement-based design. J Earthq Eng 2007, 11(4):512-530.
18. Erduran E., Kunnath S.K. Enhanced displacement coefficient method for degrading multi-degree-of-freedom systems. Earthq Spectra 2010, 26(2):311-326.
19. Fajfar P, Fischinger M. N2 - A method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular buildings. In: Proceedings of the ninth world conference in earthquake engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 5; 1988. p. 111-6.
20. Goel RK, Chadwell C. Evaluation of current nonlinear static procedures for concrete buildings using recorded strong-motion data. Data Utilization Report, California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program; 2007.
21. Gulkan P., Sozen M.A. Inelastic responses of reinforced concrete structure to earthquake motions. ACI J Proc 1974, 71(12).
22. Gupta A, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures (SAC Task 5.4.3). Report no. 132; 1999.
23. International Conference of Building Officials. Uniform Building Code, USA; 1996.
24. Iwan W.D. Estimating inelastic response spectra from elastic response spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 1980, 8(4):375-388.
25. Japan Road Association. Specifications for Highway Bridges: Seismic Design. Japan; 1990.
26. Kowalsky M.J. Displacement based design: a methodology for seismic design applied to RC bridge columns 1994, University of California, Department of Applied Mechanics/Engineering Sciences, San Diego.
27. Kwan W., Billington S. Influence of hysteretic behavior on equivalent period and damping of structural systems. J Struct Eng 2003, 129(5):576-585.
28. Lin Y.Y., Chang K.C. Study on damping reduction factor for buildings under earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng 2003, 129(2):206-214.
29. Lin Y.Y., Miranda E. Noniterative equivalent linear method for evaluation of existing structures. J Struct Eng 2008, 134(11):1685-1695.
30. Miranda E. Approximate seismic lateral deformation demands in multistory buildings. J Struct Eng 1999, 125(4):417-425.
31. Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites. J Struct Eng 2000, 126(10):1150-1159.
32. Miranda E. Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems. J Struct Eng 2001, 127(9):1005-1012.
33. Miranda E., Ruiz-García J. Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate maximum inelastic displacement demands. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2002, 31(3):539-560.
34. Moratti M. Risposta sismica di nodi trave-colonna progettati per i soli carichi di gravità: studi analitici e sperimentali. Graduation Project, Department of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Pavia, Italy; 2000 (in Italian).
35. Newmark N.M., Hall W.J. Earthquake spectra and design 1982, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley.
36. Pinho R., Marques M., Monteiro R., Casarotti C., Delgado R. Evaluation of nonlinear static procedures in the assessment of building frames. Earthq Spectra 2013, 29(4):1459-1476.
37. Pinho R., Casarotti C., Monteiro R., Delgado R. Assessment of continuous span bridges through Nonlinear Static Procedures. Earthq Spectra 2009, 25(1).
38. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM. Direct displacement-based seismic design of bridges. ACI Special Seminar on Seismic Design of Bridges, San Diego; 2003.
39. Priestley M.J.N., Calvi G.M., Kowalsky M.J. Displacement-based seismic design of structures 2007, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
40. Ramirez O.M., Constantinou M.C., Whittaker A.S., Kircher C.A., Chrysostomou C.Z. Elastic and inelastic seismic response of buildings with damping systems. Earthq Spectra 2002, 18(3):531-547.
41. Rosenblueth E., Herrera I. On a kind of hysteretic damping. ASCE J Eng Mech 1964, 90(4):37-48.
42. Ruiz-García J., Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2003, 32(9):1237-1258.
43. SAC Joint Venture, Project Task: 5.4.1 - Develop Suites of Time Histories. Draft Report. Sacramento, CA, USA; 1997.
44. Sanchez-Flores F., Igarashi A. Equivalent period and damping of SDOF systems for spectral response of the Japanese highway bridges code. Earthq Struct 2011, 2(4).
45. Seismosoft. "SeismoStruct - a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures; 2014. http://www.seismosoft.com.
46. Seneviratna GDPK, Krawinkler H. Evaluation of inelastic MDOF effects for seismic design. John A. Blume Earthquake Eng. Center Report No. 120, Stanford, US; 1997.
47. Veletsos AS, Newmark NM, Chelapati CV. Deformation spectra for elastic and elastoplastic systems subjected to ground shock and earthquake motions. In: Proceedings of the 3rd world conference in earthquake engineering, Wellington, New Zealand 1965. p. 663-80.
48. Vidic T., Fajfar P., Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 1994, 23(5):507-521.
49. Zaharia R, Taucer F. Equivalent period and damping for EC8 spectral response of SDOF ring-spring hysteretic models. Scientific and technical Reports EUR 23365 EN-2088, JRC; 2008.