Assessment of continuous span bridges through nonlinear static procedures

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 143-159

  Pinho, Rui ^a   Monteiro, Ricardo ^b   Casarotti, Chiara ^c   Delgado, Raimundo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRIDGES; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING;

BRIDGE CONFIGURATION; DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE; FORCE ESTIMATION; INTENSITY LEVELS; NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURE; OFFICE APPLICATIONS; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT;

SEISMOLOGY;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BRIDGE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; NONLINEARITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 61649093598     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.3050449     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Antoniou, S., and Pinho, R., 2004. Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure, J. Earthquake Eng. 8, 643-661.
2. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, volumes 1 and 2, Report No. ATC-40, Redwood City, CA.
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 2005. Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, FEMA 440 Report, Redwood City, CA.
4. Bommer, J. J., and Martinez-Pereira, A., 1999. The effective duration of earthquake ground motion, J. Earthquake Eng. 3, 127-172.
5. Casarotti, C., and Pinho, R., 2006. Seismic response of continuous span bridges through fibre-based finite element analysis, Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 5, 119-131.
6. Casarotti, C., and Pinho, R., 2007. An Adaptive Capacity Spectrum Method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action, Bull. Earthquake Eng. 5, 377-390.
7. Casarotti, C., Monteiro, R., and Pinho, R., 2008. Verification of spectral reduction factors for seismic assessment of bridges, New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng. Bull, submitted for publication.
8. Chopra, A. K., Goel, R. K., and Chintanpakdee, C., 2004. Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands, Earthquake Spectra 20, 757-778.
9. Chopra, A. K., and Goel, R. K., 2002. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31, 561-582.
10. Comité Europeen de Normalization (CEN), 2005. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 2: Bridges, EN 1998-2, Brussels, Belgium.
11. Eibl, J., and Keintzel, F., 1988. Seismic Shear Forces in RC Cantilever Shear Walls, Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, Paper 9-1-1.
12. Fajfar, P., 1999. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28, 979-993.
13. Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M., 1988. N2 - A method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular buildings, in Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan 5, 111-116.
14. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1997. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 273, Washington, DC, USA.
15. Freeman, S. A., 1998. Development and use of capacity spectrum method, in Proceedings of the Sixth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Washington.
16. Freeman, S. A., Nicoletti, J. P., and Tyrell, J. V., 1975. Evaluation of existing buildings for seismic risk - A case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington, in Proceedings of U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Berkley, California., 113-122.
17. Isakovic, T., and Fischinger, M., 2006. Higher modes in simplified inelastic seismic analysis of single column bent viaducts, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35, 95-114.
18. Lupoi, A., Franchin, P., and Pinto, P. E., 2007. Further probing of the suitability of push-over analysis for the seismic assessment of bridge structures, Proceedings of the First US-Italy Workshop on Seismic Design of Bridges, Pavia, Italy.
19. Paraskeva, T., Kappos, A., and Sextos, A., 2006. Development and evaluation of a modal pushover analysis procedure for seismic assessment of bridges, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35, 1269-1293.
20. Pinho, R., Casarotti, C., and Antoniou, S., 2007. A comparison of single-run pushover analysis techniques for seismic assessment of bridges, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36, 1347-1362.
21. Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M., and Kowalsky, M. J., 2007. Displacement-based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 721 pp.
22. SAC Joint Venture, 1997. Develop Suites of Time Histories, Project Task: 5.4.1, Draft Report, March 21, Sacramento CA, USA.
23. SeismoSoft, 2006. SeismoStruct - A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures, available online from http://www.seismosoft.com.