Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT: Feasibility in a multicenter patient population

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 203, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Meinel, Felix G ^a,b   Ebersberger, Ullrich ^a,c   Schoepf, U Joseph ^a   Lo, Gladys G ^d   Choe, Yeon Hyeon ^e   Wang, Yining ^f   Maivelett, Jordan A ^a   Krazinski, Aleksander W ^a   Marcus, Roy P ^b   Bamberg, Fabian ^b   De Cecco, Carlo Nicola ^a,g  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine Heart Center Munich Bogenhausen ^*  (Germany)

^d HONG KONG SANATORIUM AND HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^e Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^f PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^g SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; CT; Myocardial perfusion; Perfusion imaging

Indexed keywords

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CT; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION; PERFUSION IMAGING;

AGED; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IOHEXOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84906497108     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12328     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:213-224
2. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:177-184
3. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:991-1001
4. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1503-1516 (Pubitemid 46588415)
5. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008; 117:1283-1291 (Pubitemid 351365675)
6. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:1864-1894
7. Marcus RP, Nikolaou K, Theisen D, Reiser MF, Bamberg F. Myocardial perfusion imaging by computed tomography: today and tomorrow. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 2011; 173:14-22
8. Wince WB, Suranyi P, Schoepf UJ. Contemporary cardiovascular imaging methods for the assessment of at-risk myocardium. J Am Heart Assoc 2013; 3:e000473
9. Bamberg F, Hinkel R, Schwarz F, et al. Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model. Invest Radiol 2012; 47:71-77
10. So A, Hsieh J, Li JY, Hadway J, Kong HF, Lee TY. Quantitative myocardial perfusion measurement using CT perfusion: a validation study in a porcine model of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28:1237-1248
11. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol 2010; 45:298-305
12. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Schoepf UJ, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial volume perfusion imaging with second generation dual-source computed tomography: concepts and first experiences. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010; 4:127-135
13. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Kang DK, Rowe GW, Schoepf UJ. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 2010; 45:306-313
14. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3:811-820
15. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2011; 260:689-698
16. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR 2012; 198:521-529
17. So A, Wisenberg G, Islam A, et al. Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:39-50
18. Weininger M, Schoepf UJ, Ramachandra A, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:3703-3710
19. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, et al. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2012; 33:67-77
20. Rossi A, Dharampal A, Wragg A, et al. Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 15:85-94
21. Ebersberger U, Marcus RP, Schoepf UJ, et al. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: performance of 3D semi-automated evaluation software. Eur Radiol 2014; 24:191-199
22. Bamberg F, Klotz E, Flohr T, et al. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dual-source CT with alternating table positions: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:1168-1173
23. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44:837-845
24. Madias JE. Falsely negative thallium-201 scintigram associated with truly positive exercise electrocardiogram: the case of the globally balanced myocardial ischemia. Cardiology 2006; 105:22-24 (Pubitemid 43265187)
25. Madias JE, Knez P, Win MT. True-positive exercise electrocardiogram/ false-negative thallium-201 scintigram: a proposal of a mechanism for the paradox. Clin Cardiol 2000; 23:625-629 (Pubitemid 30650147)
26. Lesser JR, Bae R, Flygenring B, Sharkey SS, Lindberg J, Schwartz RS. Balanced myocardial ischaemia: a case of "normal" stress Tc99 sestamibi scan and diagnosis. Heart 2005; 91:e53
27. Takehana K, Nishimura S, Maeba H, Ueyama T, Iwasaka T, Nishimura T. Clinical significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes during stress myocardial perfusion imaging: sub-analysis of the J-ACCESS study. Ann Nucl Med 2010; 24:215-224