Intergovernmental fiscal transfers to support local conservation action in Europe

Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie

Volumn 58, Issue 2-3, 2014, Pages 98-114

  Schröter Schlaack, Christoph ^a   Ring, Irene ^a   Koellner, Thomas ^a   Santos, Rui ^a   Antunes, Paula ^a   Clemente, Pedro ^a   Mathevet, Raphaël ^a   Borie, Maud ^a   Grodzińska Jurczak, Małgorzata ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Biodiversity conservation; Ecological fiscal transfers; Europe; France; Germany; Poland; Policy cycle; Portugal

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; GOVERNMENT RELATIONS; INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS; NATURE CONSERVATION;

FRANCE; GERMANY; POLAND; PORTUGAL;

EID: 84906260528     PISSN: 00443751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. BECKEN, S./JOB, H. (2014): Protected areas in an era of global-local change. In: Journal of Sustainable Tourism, (22)4, 507-527.
2. BELL, S./MARZANO, M./CENT, J./KOBIERSKA, H./PODJED, D. / VANDZINSKAITE, D. / REINERT, H. / ARMAITIENE, A. / GRODZIńSKA-JURCZAK, M. / MURŠIČ, R. (2008): What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. In: Biodiversity and Conservation, (17)14, 3443-3454.
3. BOLTROMUIK, A. (2010): Europejska Sieć Ekologiczna Natura 2000 jako nowy element otoczenia polskiej wsi i rolnictwa. Warszawa. (Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa Polskiej Akademii Nauk).
4. BOLTROMUIK, A./KLODZINSKI, M. (2011): Natura 2000 jako czynnik zrównowaźonego rozwoju obszarów wiejskich regionu Zielonych Płuc Polski. Warszawa. (Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa Pobrlskiej Akademii Nauk).
5. BONNARD, M. (2009): Les Collectivités Territoriales. La Documentation Française, Paris.
6. BORIE, M./MATHEVET, R./LETOURNEAU, A./RING, I./ THOMPSON, J./MARTY, P. (2014): Exploring the contribution of fiscal transfers to protected area policy. In: Ecology and Society, (19)1, 9.
7. BRECHIN, S. R. / WILSHUSEN, P.R. / FORTWANGLER, C.L. / WEST, P.C. (2002): Beyond the square wheel. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. In: Society & Natural Resources, (15)1, 41-64.
8. Bulletin Officiel des Impôts (2007a): Taxe foncière sur les propriétés non bâties. Champ d)application. Exonération temporaire, terrains situes dans les zones humides. Paris. (Direction Générale des Impôts. 6 b-2-07 n° 113 du 15 octobre 2007).
9. Bulletin Officiel des Impôts (2007b): Impôt sur le revenu. Revenus fonciers. Imputation sur le revenu global des déficits fonciers afférents aux dépenses inhérentes au maintien et a la protection du patrimoine naturel autres que les intérêts d)emprunt. Paris. (Direction Générale des Impôts 5 d-4-07 n° 125 du 3 décembre 2007).
10. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2012): Biodiversität 2020. Das grüne Handlungskonzept zum Schutz der biologischen Vielfalt. Berlin.
11. BUTCHART, S.H.M./WALPOLE, M./COLLEN, B./VAN STRIEN, A. / SCHARLEMANN, J. P. W. / ALMOND, R.E.A./ BAILLIE, J. E. M./BOMHARD, B./BROWN, C./BRUNO, J./CARPENTER, K. E. / CARR, G.M./ CHANSON, J. / CHENERY, A.M./ CSIRKE, J. / DAVIDSON, N.C./DENTENER, F./FOSTER, M./GALLI, A./ GALLOWAY, J.N./GENOVESI, R/GREGORY, R.D./HOCKINGS, M. / KAPOS, V. / LAMARQUE, J.-F. / LEVERINGTON, F. / LOH, J. / MCGEOCH, M.A./MCRAE, L./MINASYAN, A./MORCILLO, M.H./OLDFIELD, T.E.E./PAULY, D./QUADER, S./REVENGA, C./SAUER, J.R./SKOLNIK, B./SPEAR, D./STANWELL-SMITH, D./STUART, S.N./SYMES, A./TIERNEY, M./TYRRELL, T.D./VIÉ, J.-C. / WATSON, R. (2010): Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. In: Science, (328)5982, 1164-1168.
12. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2010): Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its tenth meeting: X/22. Plan of Action on Subnational Governments, Cities and Other Local Authorities for Biodiversity. Internet: http:// www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/ cop-10/cop-10-dec-22-en.doc, 15.11.2013.
13. CENT, J. / GRODZIńSKA-JURCZAK, M./NOWAK, N. (2010): Ocena efektów małopolskiego programu konsultacji społecznych wokół obszarów Natura 2000. Public consultation programme Natura 2000 sites in Małopolska - effects) evaluation. In: Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz., (66)4, 251-260.
14. CENT, J./KOBIERSKA, H./GRODZIńSKA-JURCZAK, M./BELL, S. (2007): Who is responsible for Natura 2000 in Poland? A potential role of NGOs in establishing the programme. In: International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, (6)4, 422-435.
15. CHMIELEWSKI, T.J. (Ed.) (2008): Nature conservation management: from idea to practical results. ALTER-NET Project. Lublin / Łódź / Helskinki / Aarhus.
16. CZYBULKA, D./LUTTMANN, M. (2005): Die Berücksichtigung von Leistungen der Länder für das Naturerbe im Finanzausgleichssystem des Bundes. In: Natur und Recht, (27)2, 79-86.
17. DROSTE, N. (2013): Naturschutz im föderalen System Deutschlands. Eine ökonomische Perspektive auf einen ökologischen Länderfinanzausgleich. Oldenburg/Leipzig. (Masterarbeit, Universität Oldenburg; Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung - UFZ, Leipzig).
18. DUBEL, A. (2010): Public participation in consultations about Natura 2000 sites as a part of participatory management process. In: Lewicka, D. (Ed.): Organisation management: competitiveness, social responsibility, human capital. Kraków, 363-364.
19. EC (European Commission) (2011a): Natura 2000 network. Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000, 15.11.2013.
20. EC (European Commission) (2011b): Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/ environment/nature/biodiversity/ comm2006/pdf/2020/1-EN-ACT-part1-v7%5B1%5D.pdf, 12.5.2014.
21. EC (European Commission) (2014): Natura 2000: Nature and biodiversity newsletter. January 2014. Internet: http:// ec.europa.eu/environmenVnature/info/ pubs/docs/nat2000 news1/nat35-en.pdf, 12.5.2014.
22. Eurostat (2014): Area - NUTS 3 regions. Internet: http:// appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction. doysessionid= 9ea7d07e30d67667cf49693e4f4fbce38d42 6d451843.e34MbxeSahmMa40LbNiMbxaMchaPe0, 12.5. 2014.
23. EVERETT, S. (2003): The policy cycle. Democratic process or rational paradigm revisited? In: Australian Journal of Public Administration, (62)2, 65-70.
24. GRODZIńSKA-JURCZAK, M./CENT, J. (2010): Udział społeczny szans dla realizacji programu Natura 2000 w Polsce. Public participatory approach - a chance for Natura 2000 implementation in Poland. In: Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz., (66)5, 341-352.
25. GRODZIńSKA-JURCZAK, M./CENT, J. (2011a): Can public participation increase nature conservation effectiveness? In: Innovation - The European Journal of Social Science Research, (24)3, 307-314.
26. GRODZIńSKA-JURCZAK, M./CENT, J. (2011b): Expansion of nature conservation areas - problems with Natura 2000 implementation in Poland? In: Environmental Management, (47)1, 11-27.
27. GRODZIńSKA-JURCZAK, M./BOCKOWSKI, M./CENT, J./PIE-TRZYK-KASZYNSKA, A. (2012): Problemy społeczno-ekono-miczne przy wyznaczaniu obszarów Natura 2000 w Polsce. Socio-economic problems during Natura 2000 site selection process. In: TEKA Komisji Ochrony i Kształtowania rodowiska Przyrodniczego Oddziału PAN w Lublinie 9, 64-69.
28. GUENGANT, A./JOSSELIN, J.-M. (2006): Réforme constitutionnelle des finances locales: quels sens donner au principe d)égalité? In: Revue d)Économie Régionale & Urbaine, (5), 667-682.
29. HOWARD, C. (2005) The policy cycle. A model of post-Ma-chiavellian policy making? In: Australian Journal of Public Administration, (64)3, 3-13.
30. HOWLETT, M. / RAMESH, M. (2003): Studying public policy. Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford.
31. Instituto Nacional de Estatistica (2013): Statistical year-book of Portugal 2012. Lisbon.
32. JERMACZEK, A./PAWLACZYK, P. (2004): Natura 2000 -narździe ochrony przyrody. Planowanie ochrony obszarów Natura 2000. Warszawa.
33. KETTUNEN, M./TORKLER, P./RAYMENT, M. (2014): Financing Natura 2000 in 2014-2020. Guidance handbook. Commissioned by the European Commission DG Environment (Jan 2014 draft). Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ nature/natura2000/financing/docs/handbook.pdf, 12.5.2014.
34. KÖLLNER, T./SCHELSKE, O./SEIDL, I. (2002): Integrating biodiversity into intergovernmental fiscal transfers based on cantonal benchmarking. A Swiss case study. In: Basic and Applied Ecology, (3)4, 381-391.
35. KORIOTH, S. (1997): Der Finanzausgleich zwischen Bund und Ländern. Tübingen.
36. KRONENBERG, J. / BERGIER, T. (2010): Wyzwania zrównowa- źonego rozwoju w Polsce. Kraków.
37. MAES, J./PARACCHINI, M.L./ZULIAN, G. (2011): A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services. Towards an atlas of ecosystem services. Ispra.
38. MATHEVET, R. / THOMPSON, J. / DELANOE, O. /CHEYLAN, M. / GIL-FOURRIER, C./BONNIN, M. (2010): La solidarité écologique: un nouveau concept pour la gestion intégrée des parcs nationaux et des territoires. In: Natures Sciences Sociétés, (18)4, 424-433.
39. MAY, P.H./VEIGA NETO, F./DENARDIN, V./LOUREIRO, W. (2002): Using fiscal instruments to encourage conservation: Municipal responses to the (ecological) value-added tax in Paraná and Minas Gerais, Brazil. In: Pagiola, S./Bishop, J./Landell-Mills, N. (Eds.): Selling Forest Environmental Services. Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development. London, 173-199.
40. MAYER, M./JOB, H. (2014): The economics of protected areas - a European perspective. In: Zeitschrift für Wirt-schaftsgeographie, (58)2-3, 73-97.
41. MÖCKEL, S. (2013): Berücksichtigung von Umwelt- und Naturschutzaufgaben bei der Verteilung von Staatsfinanzen zwischen Bund und Ländern. Erfordernisse und Möglichkeiten im Rahmen des Finanzausgleichs, der Bundesauftragsund bundeseigener Verwaltung oder den Gemein-schaftsaufgaben. In: Zeitschrift für Europäisches Umweltund Planungsrecht, (11)2, 85-94.
42. MV-Schlagzeilen (2008): Backhaus begrüßt Erklärung des Bundes und der Länder zur biologischen Vielfalt. MV-Schlagzeilen - Nachrichten aus Mecklenburg-Vorpom-mern. Internet: http://www.mv-schlagzeilen. de/backhaus-begruesst-erklaerung-des-bundes-und-der-laender-zur-bio logischen-vielfalt/2418/, 15.11.2013.
43. NIK (Najwyzsza Izba Kontroli) (2008): Informacja o wynikach kontroli wdraźania ochrony na obszarach Natura 2000. Internet: http://www.nik.gov.pl/kontrole/wyniki-kontroli- nik/kontrole,1664.html, 15.11.2013.
44. OLSON, M. (1969): The principle of "Fiscal Equivalence". The division of responsibilities among different levels of government. In: The American Economic Review, (59)2, 479-487.
45. PAAVOLA, J. / GOULDSON, A. / KLUVÁNKOVÁ-ORAVSKÁ, T. (2009): Interplay of actors, scales, frameworks and regimes in the governance of biodiversity. In: Environmental Policy and Governance, (19)3,148-158.
46. FERNER, A./THÖNE, M. (2007): Naturschutz im kommunalen Finanzausgleich - Anreize für eine nachhaltige Flächennutzung. Bonn/Bad Godesberg. (BfN-Skripten Nr. 192).
47. RING, I. (2002): Ecological public functions and fiscal equalisation at the local level in Germany. In: Ecological Economics, (42)3, 415-27.
48. RING, I. (2008a): Biodiversity governance. Adjusting local costs and global benefits. In: Sikor, T. (Ed.): Public and private in natural resource governance. A false dichotomy? London, 107-126.
49. RING, I. (2008b): Compensating municipalities for protected areas. Fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation in Saxony, Germany. In: GAIA, (17)1, 143-151.
50. RING, I. (2008c): Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers. The case of the ecological ICMS in Brazil. In: Land Use Policy, (25)4, 485-497.
51. RING, I./MAY, P.H./LOUREIRO, W./SANTOS, R./ANTONES, P./CLEMENTE, P. (2011): Ecological fiscal transfers. In: Ring, I. / Schröter-Schlaack, C. (Eds.): Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies. Leipzig, 98-118. (POLICYMIX Report No. 2/2011, Internet: http://policymix.nina.no).
52. RING, I. / SCHRÖTER-SCHLAACK, C. (eds.) (2011): Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies. Leipzig. (POLICYMIX Report No. 2/2011, Internet: http://policymix.nina.no).
53. RING, I./SANTOS, R. (2013): Aligning ecological fiscal transfers in national and state policy mixes. Portugal and Brazil - the research perspective. Trondheim, Norway. (7th Trondheim Conference on Biodiversity, 27-31 May 2013).
54. SANTOS, R./RING, I./ANTONES, R/CLEMENTE, P. (2012a): Fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation. The Portuguese Local Finances Law. In: Land Use Policy, (29)2, 261-273.
55. SANTOS, R. /ANTONES, P./CLEMENTE, P./RIBAS, T. (2012b): Assessment of the role of economic instruments in the Portuguese conservation policymix - a national coarse grain analysis. Lisbon. (POLICYMIX Report No. 1/2012, Internet: http://policymix.nina.no).
56. SARMENTO, P. (2013): Economic and financial incentives in the Portuguese conservation policy. Role of and challenges for ecological fiscal transfers - the policy perspective. Trondheim, Norway. (7th Trondheim Conference on Biodiversity, 27-31 May 2013).
57. SCHRÖTER-SCHLAACK, C./RING, I. / SCHULZ-ZUNKEL, C./ MÖCKEL, S./KLENKE, R./LIENHOOP, N./LENK, T. (2013): Assessment of existing and proposed policy instruments for biodiversity conservation in Germany: the role of ecological fiscal transfers. Leipzig. (POLICYMIX Report No. 1/2013; Internet: http://policymix.nina.no).
58. SHAH, A. (2007): A practitioner)s guide to intergovernmental fiscal transfers. In: Boadway, R./Shah, A. (Eds.): Intergovernmental fiscal transfers. Principles and practices. Washington DC, 1-53.
59. SKOK, J.E. (1995): Policy issue networks and the public policy cycle. A structural-functional framework for public administration. In: Public Administration Review, (55)4, 325-332.
60. SRU (Der Rat von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen) (1996): Konzepte einer dauerhaft-umweltgerechten Nutzung ländlicher Räume. Sondergutachten. Stuttgart.
61. SRU (Der Rat von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen) (2002): Für eine Stärkung und Neuorientierung des Natur- schutzes. Sondergutachten - Zusammenfassung und Fazit. Berlin.
62. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland (2011). Internet: http://www.stat.gov.pl/gus/5840-2844-ENG-HTML. htm, 15.11.2013.
63. Statistisches Bundesamt (2013): Statistisches Jahrbuch 2013. Wiesbaden.
64. STERN, N. (2007): The economics of climate change. The Stem review. Cambridge.
65. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) (2010): The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Internet: http://www.teebweb.org, 15.11.2013.
66. TEEB (2011): The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in national and international policy making. London. (Ed. by P. ten Brink).
67. THOMPSON, J. / MATHEVET, R. / DELANOË, O. / GIL-FOURRIER, C./BONNIN, M./CHEYLAN, M. (2011): Ecological solidarity as a conceptual tool for rethinking ecological and social interdependence in conservation policy for protected areas and their surrounding landscape. In: Comptes Rendus Biologics, (334)5-6, 412-119.
68. UNEP (2009): Integrated policymaking for sustainable development. A reference manual. Geneva.
69. WÄTZOLD, F./MEWES, M./VAN APELDOORN, R./VARJOPURO, R./CHMIELEWSKI, T.J./VEENEKLAAS, F./KOSOLA, M.-L. (2010): Cost-effectiveness of managing Natura 2000 sites. An exploratory study for Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Poland. In: Biodiversity and Conservation, (19)7,2053-2069.
70. WWF/IEEP (World Wildlife Fund, Institute for European Environmental Policy) (2009): Innovative use of EU funds to finance management measures and activities in Natura 2000 sites. Brussels.