Biodiversity governance: Adjusting local costs and global benefits

Public and Private in Natural Resource Governance: A False Dichotomy?

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 107-126

  Ring, Irene ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925828566     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849775984     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Anderson, T L and Hill, P J (1996) Environmental Federalism: Thinking Smaller, Property and Environment Research Center Policy Series, No PS-8, Bozeman, MT.
2. Arantes, A (2006) ‘ICMS Ecologico, uma oportunidade historica De Goias’, www.semarh.goias.gov.br (accessed 26 May 2006).
3. Bauer, S, Abresch, J-P and Steuernagel, M (1996) Gesamtinstrumentarium zur Erreichung einer umweltvertraglichen Raumnutzung
4. CPRH (State Agency of the Environment of Pernambuco) (2003) ‘Decret No 25,574’, www.cprh.pe.gov.br/ctudo-secoes-sub.aspiidsecaoH78 (accessed 27 May 2004) Doring, T (1998) ‘Moglichkeiten der Dezentralisierung im Bereich globaler Umweltprobleme-Das Beispiel des Natur-und Artenschutzes in Deutschland’ in Renner, A and Hinterberger, F (eds) Zukunfisfahigkeit und Neoliberalimus, Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp425-441.
5. Echavarria, M (2000) ‘Valuation of water-related services to downstream users in rural watersheds: Determining values for the use and protection of water resources’, FAO Background Paper, no 4, presented at the Electronic Workshop ‘Land-Water Linkages in Rural Watersheds’, 18 September-27 October 2000, Rome.
6. Freitas, A (1999) ICMS ecologico-Um Instrumento Economico para Conserva^ao da Biodiversidade, World Wide Fund for Nature Brazil
7. Grieg-Gran, M (2000) Fiscal Incentives for Biodiversity Conservation: The ICMS Ecologico in Brazil, Discussion Paper 00-01, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
8. Gutman, P (ed) (2003) From Goodwill to Payments for Environmental Services, World Wide Fund for Nature, Washington, DC Hampicke, U (1991) Naturschutzokonomie, Ulmer, Stuttgart.
9. ‘Naturschutzpolitik’ in Hansjurgens, B and Watzold, F (eds) Umweltpolitik und umweltokonomische Politikberatung in Deutschland, special issue of Zeitschrift fur angewandte Umweltforschung, vol 15, pp162-177
10. Vancouver Hein, L, van Koppen, K, De Groot, R.S. and van Ierland, E.C. (2006) ‘Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services’, Ecological Economics, vol 57, no 2, pp209-228.
11. Hendrischke, O (2004) ‘Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in der Foderalismusreform: Starkung der Handlungsfahigkeit durch Neugestaltung der Gesetzgebungskompetenzen’, Natur und Landschaft, vol 6, pp276-279.
12. Jordan, A, Wurzel, R K W and Zito, A R (eds) (2003) New Instruments of Environmental Governance? National Experiences and Prospects, Frank Cass, London
13. Kollner, T, Schelske, O and Seidl, I (2002) ‘Integrating biodiversity into intergovernmental fiscal transfers based on cantonal benchmarking: A Swiss case study’, Basic and Applied Ecology, vol 3, pp381-391
14. Loureiro, W (2001) O ICMS Ecologico na biodiversidade, IAP Regional De Campo, Mourao.
15. Loureiro, W (2004) ‘ICMS Ecologico-a consolida^ao De uma experiencia brasileira De incentivo a conserva^ao da biodiversidade’, Seminario De Pos-Gradua^ao em Engenharia Florestal, Universidade Federal do Parana, Setor De Ciencias Agrarias, Parana, www.floresta.ufpr.br/pos-graduacao/eventos.html (accessed 12 August 2004)
16. May, P H, Veiga Neto, F, Denardin, V and Loureiro, W (2002) ‘Using fiscal instruments to encourage conservation: Municipal responses to the “ecological” value-added tax in Parana and Minas Gerais, Brazil’ in Pagiola, S, Bishop, J and Landell-Mills, N (eds) Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, Earthscan, London, pp173-199 De Melo, J J and Prates, J (2007) ‘EcoTerra Model-economic instruments for sustainable land use management in Portugal’, Paper presented at the 7th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, 5-8 June, Leipzig Mesquita, C A B (2004) RPPN da Mata Atldntica, Conserva^ao Internacional, Belo Horizonte Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005a) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC.
17. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005b) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC MMA (Ministry of the Environment) (2002) ‘National Program for the Conservation of Biodiversity-DCBIO: Second National Report of Brazil to the Convention on Biological Diversity’, MMA (Ministry of the Environment), Biodiversity and Forest Secretariat-SFB, preliminary version, Brasilia Musgrave, R M (1959) The Theory of Public Finance, McGraw-Hill, New York Oates, W E (1972) Fiscal Federalism, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York Oates, W E (1999) ‘An essay on fiscal federalism’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol 37, no 3, pp1120-1149.
18. Oates, W.E. (2001) ‘A reconsideration of environmental federalism’, Discussion Paper 01-54, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC Olson, M Jr (1969) ‘The principle of “fiscal equivalence”: The division of responsibilities among different levels of government’, American Economic Review, vol 59, no 2, pp479-487.
19. Pearce, D and Turner, R K (1990) Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment, Johns Hopkins University Press
20. Petry, D and Dombrowsky, I (2007) ‘River basin management in Germany: Past experiences and challenges ahead’ in Erickson, J D, Messner, F and Ring, I (eds) Ecological Economics of Sustainable Watershed Management, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp11-42
21. Ring, I (2004a) ‘Naturschutz in der foderalen Aufgabenteilung: Zur Notwendigkeit einer Bundeskompetenz aus okonomischer Perspektive’, Natur und Landschaft, vol 79, no 11, pp494-500.
22. Ring, i (2004b) ‘integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: The case of the ICMS-E in Brazil’, UFZDiscussion Papers, no 12/2004, UFZ centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig.
23. Simila, J, Thum, R, Varjopuro, R and Ring, I (2006) ‘Protected species in conflict with fisheries: The interplay between European and national regulation’, Journal of European Environmental Planning and Law, vol 5, pp432-445.
24. SRU (Rat Von Sachverstan digen fur Umweltfragen) (1996) Konzepte einer dauerhaft-umweltgerechten Nutzung landlicher Raume, Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart.
25. SRU (2006) ‘Der Umweltschutz in der Foderalismusreform’, communication no 10, SRU, Berlin.
26. Stoll-Kleemann, S (2001) ‘Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: A model explaining opposition to protected areas’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol 21, no 4, pp369-385.
27. Stratmann, U (2002) ‘Aufgabenspezifische Erfassung der Naturschutzaufgaben Von Bund und Landern (1985-2001): Methode, Analyse, Ergebnisse’, unpublished research report for the German Agency for Nature Protection.
28. Tiebout, C M (1956) ‘A pure theory of local expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy, vol 64, pp416-424.
29. Turner, R K, Brouwer, R, Crowards, T C and Georgiou, S (2003a) ‘The economics of wetland management’ in Turner, R K, van den Bergh, J C J M and Brouwer, R (eds) Managing Wetlands: An Ecological Economics Approach, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp73-107.
30. Turner, R K, Paavola, J, Farber, S, Cooper, P, Jessamy, V and Georgiou, S (2003b) ‘valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions’, Ecological Economics, vol 46, no 3, pp493-510.
31. Urfei, G (2002) ‘Regionale Verteilung Von Schutzgebieten in Deutschland-Eine empirisch gestutzte Bewertung der raumlichen Implikationen des Natur-und Landschaftsschutzes per Ordnungsrecht’, Agrarwirtschaft, vol 51, no 5, pp249-258.
32. Veiga Neto, F (2005) ‘The Nature Conservancy of Brazil’, Curitiba, personal communication.
33. Villar Martins, G I (2003) ‘Analise do Efeito da Implanta^ao do ICMS Ecologico no Pantanal Sulmatogrossense’, Governmental School of Mato Grosso do Sul Secretary of Public Relations (SEGES), www.escolagov.ms.gov.br/inicial/index.php?id=29&art_id=78 (accessed 27 May 2004).
34. Young, C E Frickman (2005) ‘Financial mechanisms for conservation in Brazil’, Conservation Biology, vol 19, no 3, pp756-761.