Can public participation increase nature conservation effectiveness?

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 371-378

  Grodzińska Jurczak, Małgorzata ^a   Cent, Joanna ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Eu; Human dimension; Nature conservation; Public participation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; NATURAL RESOURCE; NATURE CONSERVATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH;

EID: 84855658739     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: 14698412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2011.592069     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bland, F. and Thiry, E., 2003. Wdrażanie Europejskiej Sieci Ekologicznej Natura 2000 we Francji. In: M. Makomaska-Juchiewicz and S. Tworek, eds. Ekologiczna sieć Natura 2000 problem czy szansa? Kraków: Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN.
2. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., et al., 2007. Sharing power. A global guide to collaborative management of natural resources. London: Gutenberg Press.
3. Brown, T.L., et al., 2001. Human dimensions of wildlife management in North America. Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society.
4. Conley, A. and Moote, M.A., 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resources management. Society and natural resources, 16, 371-386.
5. Daniels, S. and Walker, G.B., 1996. Collaborative learning: improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based environment. Environmental impact assessment review, 16, 71-102.
6. Diaz, C.L., 2001. The EC Habitats Directive approaches its tenth anniversary: an overview. RECIEL, 10 (3), 287-295.
7. Folke, C., et al., 2007 The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecology and society, 12(1), 30. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art30/ [Accessed 1 December 2010].
8. Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. and Cent, J., 2010. Udział społeczny szansa{ogon} dla realizacji program Natura 2000 w Polsce. [Public participatory approach a chance for Natura 2000 implementation in Poland.]. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz., 66, 341-352.
9. Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. and Cent, J., 2011. Expansion of nature conservation areas problems with Natura 2000 implementation in Poland? Environmental management, 47, 11-27.
10. Gruber, J.S., 2010. Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified approaches for managing the commons. Environmental management, 45 (1), 52-66.
11. Hiedenpää, J., 2002. European-wide conservation versus local well-being: the reception of the Natura 2000 Reserve Network in Kavia, SW-Finland. Landscape urban planning, 61, 113-123.
12. Lee, S. and Roth, W.M., 2006. Community-level controversy over a natural resource: toward a more democratic science in society. Society and natural resources, 19, 429-445.
13. Lejano, R.P., et al., 2007. The importance of context: integrating resource conservation with local institutions. Society and natural resources, 20, 177-185.
14. Lewis, C., 1996. Managing conflicts in protected areas. Cambidge: IUCN.
15. Life-Nature, 2005. Integrated management of Natura 2000 sites: the contribution of LIFENature projects. Luxemburg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. European Commission.
16. Lurie, S. and Hibbard, M., 2008. Community-based natural resource management: ideals and realities for Oregon Watershed Councils. Society and natural resources, 21, 430-440.
17. Manfredo, M.J., Vaske, J.J., and Decker, D.J., 1995. Human dimensions of wildlife: basic concepts. In: R. Knight and K. Gutzwiller, eds. Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research. Washington, DC: Island Press.
18. Margereum, R.D., 2007. Overcoming locally based constraints. Society and natural resources, 20, 135-152.
19. Marquart-Pyatt, S.T., 2007. Concern for the environment among general publics: a crossnational study. Society and natural resources, 20, 883-898.
20. Mascarenhas, M. and Scarce, R., 2004. "The intention was good": legitimacy, consensusbased decision making, and the case of forest planning in British Columbia, Canada. Society and natural resources, 17, 17-38.
21. McGurk, B., Sinclair, A.J., and Diduck, A., 2006. An assessment of stakeholder advisory committees on forest management: case studies from Manitoba, Canada. Society and natural resources, 19, 809-826.
22. McKinney, M. and Field, P., 2008. Evaluating community-based collaboration on federal lands and resources. Society and natural resources, 21, 419-429.
23. Mendez-Contreras, J., Dickinson, F., and Castillo-Burguete, T., 2008. Community member viewpoints on the RiaCelestun Biosphere Reserve, Yucatan, Mexico: suggestions for improving the community/natural protected area relationship. Human ecology, 36 (1), 111-123.
24. Moran, M., 2002. Review article: understanding the regulatory state. British journal of political sciences, 32, 391-413.
25. Nowicki, M., 1993. Environment in Poland. Issues and solutions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
26. Pellow, D., 1999. Negotiation and confrontation: Environmental policymaking throughconsensus. Society and natural resources, 2, 189-203
27. Piérola de S.C.F., et al., 2009. Natura 2000 i spoleczenstwo. Instrumentykomunikacjispolecznej w zarza{ogon}dzaniu siecia{ogon} Natura 2000. Warszawa: EDIT.
28. Roth, W.M., et al., 2004. Those who get hurt aren't always being heard: scientist-resident interactions over community water. Science, technology and human values, 29, 153-183.
29. Schmeller, D.S., et al., 2009. Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conservation biology, 23, 307-316.
30. Schusler, T.M. and Decker, D.J., 2002. Engaging local communities in wildlife management area planning: an evaluation of the Lake Ontario Islands search conference. Wildlife society B, 30 (4), 1226-1237.
31. Silva, J.P., et al., 2009. Protecting Europe's nature: learning from LIFE. Nature conservation best practices. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
32. Stec, S., Casey-Lefkovitz S., and Jendrośka J., eds., 2000. The Aarhus Convention an implementation guide. New York: United Nations.
33. Steelman, T.A. and Ascher, W., 1997. Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs. Policy science, 30 (2), 71-90.
34. Sundseth, K., 2004. Life-Nature communicating with stakeholders and the generic public. Best practice examples for NATURA 2000. Luxembourg: Life-Focus.
35. Vandzinskaite, D., et al., 2010. Cultural diversity issues in biodiversity monitoring cases of Lithuania, Poland and Denmark. Diversity, 2, 1130-1145.
36. Wagenet, L. and Pfeffer, M.J., 2007. Organizing citizen engagement for democratic environmental planning. Society and natural resources, 20, 801-813.
37. Wilshusen, P.R. and Brechin, S.R., 2003. Contested nature. Conservation and development at the turn of the twenty-first century. In: S.R. Brechin et al., eds. Contested nature. Promoting international biodiversity with social justice in the twenty-first century. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1-22.