The effect of presenting information about invasive follow-up testing on individuals' noninvasive colorectal cancer screening participation decision: Results from a discrete choice experiment

Value in Health

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 578-587

  Benning, Tim M ^a,b   Dellaert, Benedict G C ^c   Severens, Johan L ^a   Dirksen, Carmen D ^d,e  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

colorectal cancer; conjoint analysis; preferences; public health; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; BLOOD SAMPLING; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; TUMOR INVASION;

COLORECTAL CANCER; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; PREFERENCES; PUBLIC HEALTH; THE NETHERLANDS;

AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84906247803     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. T.M. Benning, B.G. Dellaert, C.D. Dirksen, and J.L. Severens Preferences for potential innovations in non-invasive colorectal cancer screening: A labeled discrete choice experiment for a Dutch screening campaign Acta Oncol 2014 January 23 [Epub ahead of print]
2. G. Gyrd-Hansen, and J. Søgaard Analysing public preferences for cancer screening programmes Health Econ 10 2001 617 634
3. K. Howard, and G. Salkeld Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer Value Health 12 2009 354 363
4. M. Nayaradou, C. Berchi, O. Dejardin, and G. Launoy Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization Med Decis Mak 30 2010 224 233
5. G. Salkeld, M. Solomon, and L. Short et al. Evidence-based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screening Aust N Z J Public Health 27 2003 449 455
6. E.W. De Bekker-Grob, L. Hol, and B. Donkers et al. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening Value Health 13 2010 315 323
7. S.T. Hawley, R.J. Volk, and P. Krishnamurthy et al. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients Med Care 46 2008 10 16
8. L. Hol, E.W. de Bekker-Grob, and L. van Dam et al. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment Br J Cancer 102 2010 972 980
9. D.A. Marshall, F. Reed Johnson, and K.A. Philips et al. Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey Value Health 10 2007 415 430
10. D.A. Marshall, F.R. Johnson, and N.A. Kulin et al. How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice survey Health Econ 18 2009 1420 1439
11. L. Van Dam, L. Hol, and E.W. de Bekker-Grob et al. What determines individuals' preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experiment Eur J Cancer 46 2010 150 159
12. N.J. West, C. Boustière, and W. Fischbach et al. Colorectal cancer screening in Europe: differences in approach; similar barriers to overcome Int J Colorectal Dis 24 2009 731 740
13. M. Ryan, and F. San Miguel Revisiting the axiom of completeness in health care Health Econ 12 2003 295 307
14. C. Berchi, J.M. Dupuis, and G. Launoy The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France Eur J Health Econ 7 2006 91 98
15. C. von Wagner, A. Good, S.G. Smith, and J. Wardle Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences Health Expect 15 2011 176 186
16. Z. Berkowitz, N.A. Hawkins, and L.A. Peipins et al. Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults J Am Geriatr Soc 56 2008 307 314
17. A.K. Greiner, W. Born, N. Nollen, and J. Ahluwalia Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans J Gen Intern Med 20 2005 977 983
18. C.N. Klabunde, S.W. Vernon, and M.R. Nadel et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults Med Care 43 2005 939 944
19. M. Deutekom, A.F. van Rijn, and E. Dekker et al. Uptake of faecal occult blood test colorectal cancer screening by different ethnic groups in the Netherlands Eur J Public Health 19 2009 400 402
20. L.G. Van Rossum, A.F. van Rijn, and R.J. Laheij et al. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population Gastroenterology 135 2008 82 90
21. D.A. Hensher, J.M. Rose, and W.H. Greene Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer 2005 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
22. J.J. Louviere, D.A. Hensher, and J.D. Swait Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application 2000 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
23. M. Ryan, K. Gerard, and M. Amaya-Amaya Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care Vol. 11 2008 Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands
24. E.W. De Bekker-Grob, M. Ryan, and K. Gerard Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature Health Econ 21 2012 145 172
25. E. Lancsar, and J.J. Louviere Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide Pharmacoeconomics 26 2008 661 677
26. D. Atkins, M. Eccles, and S. Flottorp et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations, I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. The GRADE Working Group BMC Health Serv Res 4 2004 38
27. N. Greer, G. Mosser, G. Logan, and N. Halaas A practical approach to evidence grading Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 26 2000 700 712
28. D.A. Marshall, E.S. McGregor, and G. Currie Measuring preferences for colorectal cancer screening: what are the implications for moving forward? Patient 3 2010 79 89
29. S.L. Goede, A.H. van Roon, and J.C. Reijerink et al. Cost-effectiveness of one versus two sample faecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening Gut 62 2013 727 734
30. L.J.W. Bosch, B. Carvalho, and J.A. Fijneman et al. Molecular tests for colorectal cancer screening Clin Colorectal Cancer 10 2011 8 23
31. J.M. Rose, and M.C.J. Bliemer Stated preference experimental design strategies D.A. Hensher, K.J. Button, Handbook of Transport Modelling 2008 Elsevier Oxford
32. J.M. Rose, and M.C.J. Bliemer Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs Transp Rev 29 2009 587 617
33. M. Bech, T. Kjaer, and J. Lauridsen Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment? Health Econ 20 2011 273 286
34. U.A. Marbet, P. Bauerfeind, and J. Brunner et al. Colonoscopy is the preferred colorectal cancer screening method in a population-based program Endoscopy 40 2008 650
35. B. Levin, D. Brooks, R.A. Smith, and A. Stone Emerging technologies in screening for colorectal cancer: CT colonography, immunochemical fecal occult blood tests, and stool screening using molecular markers CA Cancer J Clin 53 2003 44 55
36. A. Sieg, K. Friedrich, and U. Sieg Is PillCam COLON capsule endoscopy ready for colorectal cancer screening? A prospective feasibility study in a community gastroenterology practice Am J Gastroenterol 104 2009 848 854
37. A. Van Gossum, M. Munoz-Navas, and I. Fernandez-Urien et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer N Engl J Med 361 2009 264 270
38. K. Howard, G. Salkeld, and M.P. Pignone et al. Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment Value Health 14 2011 1146 1152
39. M. Ben-Akiva, M. Bradley, and M. Morikawa et al. Combining revealed and stated preferences data Market Lett 5 1994 335 350
40. D.A. Hensher, J. Louviere, and J. Swait Combining sources of preference data J Econom 89 1999 197 221