Revisiting the axiom of completeness in health care

Health Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 295-307

  Ryan, Mandy ^a   San Miguel, Fernando ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CANCER SCREENING; DENTAL CARE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTESTINE CANCER; MARKET; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMMERCE; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DENTISTS; FOOD INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCOTLAND; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 0037387822     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.730     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Deaton A, Muellbauer J. Economics and Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1980.
2. Fischhoff B. Value elicitation: is there anything in there? Am Psychol 1991; 46: 835-847.
3. Tversky A, Sattah S, Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychol Rev 1988; 95: 371-384.
4. Plott CR. Rational individual behaviour in markets and social choice processes. In The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour, Arrow KJ, Colombatto E, Perlman M, Schmidt C (eds). St. Martins Press: New York, 1996.
5. Mitchell RC, Carson RT. Using surveys to value public goods. The contingent valuation method, Washington, Resour future 1989.
6. Aaron HJ. Distinguished lecture in economics in government. Public policy, values, and consciousness. J Econ Perspect 1994; 8: 3-21.
7. Slovic P, Lichtenstein, S. Preference reversals: a broader perspective. Am Econ Rev 1983; 73: 596-605.
8. Gregory R, Lichestein S, Slovic P. Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J Risk Uncertainty 1993; 7: 177-197.
9. Slovic P. The construction of preference. Am Psychol 1995; 50: 364-371.
10. Payne JW, Bettam JR, Johnson EJ. Behavioral decision research: a constructive processing perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 1992; 43: 87-131.
11. Slovic P, Lichtenstein S. Preference reversals: a broader perspective. Am Econ Rev 1983; 73: 596-605.
12. Grether DM, Plott CR. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. Am Econ Rev 1979; 69: 623-638.
13. Slovic P, Griffin D, Tversky A. Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In Insights in Decision Making: a Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn, Hogarth RM (ed). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1990.
14. Tversky A, Slovic P, Kahneman D. The causes of preference reversal. Am Econ Rev 1990; 80: 204-217.
15. Carson RT. Contingent valuation: a user's guide. Environ Sci Technol 2000; 34: 1413-1418.
16. Hoehn J, Randall AJ. A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 1987; 14: 226-247.
17. Cookson R. Incorporating psycho-social considerations into health valuation: an experimental study. J Health Econ 2000; 19: 369-401.
18. Opaluch JJ, Segerson, K. Rational roots of 'irrational' behaviour. New theories of economic decision making. Northeast J Agric Resource Econ 1989; 18: 81-95.
19. Ready RC, Whitehead JC, Blomquist GC. Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent. J Environ Econ Manage 1995; 29: 181-196.
20. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney P, Leamer E, Radner R, Schuman H. Report of the NOAA Panel of Contingent Valuation. Fed Regist 1993; 10: 4601-4614.
21. Wang H. Treatment of 'Don't Know' responses in contingent valuation surveys: a random valuation model. J Environ Econ Manage 1997; 32: 219-232.
22. Lockwood M. Integrated value assessment using paired comparisons. Ecol Econ 1998; 25: 73-87.
23. Li C-Z, Mattsson L. Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: An improved structural model for contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 1995; 28: 256-269.
24. Hanemann WM, Kristrom B. Preference uncertainty, optimal designs and spikes. In Current Issues in Environmental Economics, Johansson P-O. Kristrom B, Maler, K-G (eds). Manchester University Press: New York, 1995.
25. Common M, Reid I, Blamey R. Do existence values for cost benefit analysis exist? Environ Resource Econ 1997; 9: 225-238.
26. Clark J, Burgess J, Harrison CM. 'I struggled with this money business': respondents' perspectives on contingent valuation. Ecol Econ 2000; 33: 45-62.
27. Schkade DA, Payne JW. How people respond to contingent valuation questions: a verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. Environ Econ and Manage 1994; 26: 88-109.
28. Butler DJ, Loomes G. Decision difficulty and imprecise preferences. Acta Psychol 1988; 68: 183-196.
29. Butler DJ. Do non-expected utility choice patterns spring from hazy preferences? An experimental study of choice "errors". J Econ Behav and Organ 2000; 41: 277-297.
30. Dubourg WR, Jones-Lee, MW and Loomes, G. Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity. J Risk Uncertainty 1994; 9: 115-133.
31. Sugden R. Alternatives to the neo-classical theory of choice. In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries, Bateman IJ, Willis KG (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999.
32. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference dependent model. Quart J Econ 1991; 107: 1039-1061.
33. Dolan P, Cookson R, Ferguson B. Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study. Br Med J 1999; 318: 916-919.
34. Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, Bate A, van Teijlingen E, Russell E, Napper M, Robb C. Eliciting public preferences for health care: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5(5).
35. Shiell A, Hawe P, Seymour J. Values and preferences are not necessarily the same. Health Econ Lett 1997; 6: 515-518.
36. Shiell A, Seymour J, Hawe P, Cameron S. Are preferences over health states complete? Health Econ 2000; 9: 47-55.
37. Oliver A. Complete preferences over health states: a reply to the paper by Shiell et al. Health Econ 2000; 9: 727-728.
38. Shiell A, Hawe P, Seymour J. Will our understanding of completeness ever be complete? Health Econ 2000; 9: 729-731.
39. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2000.
40. Timmermans H. Consumer choice of shopping centre: an information integration approach. Reg Stud 1981; 16: 171-182.
41. Chakraborty G, Gaeth GJ, Cunningham M. Understanding consumers' preferences for dental service. J Health Care Market 1993; 1: 48-58.
42. Salkeld G, Ryan M, Shor, L. The veil of experience: do consumers prefer what they know best? Health Econ Lett 2000; 9: 267-270.
43. Bradley M. User's Manual for the Speed Version 2.1 Stated Preference Experiment Editor and Designer. Hague Consulting Group: Hague, 1991.
44. San Miguel F. Testing the assumptions of completeness, stability and rationality of preferences in health economics using discrete choice experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2000.
45. Kreps DM. Preference relations and revealed preference. In Notes on the Theory of Choice, Chapter 2. Westview Press: Colorado, 1988.
46. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall: London, 1991.
47. Mercator Computers Systems Ltd. SNAP Survey Software 5, 2000.
48. Schuman H, Presser S. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context. Academic Press: New York, 1981.
49. Ryan M, Reeves C, Entwistle V. Listening to respondents: a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. Paper Presented to Health Economic Study Group Meeting, University of East Anglia, 2002.
50. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press: Cambridge, 1984.
51. Carroll JS, Johnson EJ. Decision Research: A Field Guide. Sage: Newbury Park, 1990.