The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France

European Journal of Health Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 91-98

  Berchi, Célia ^a,b   Dupuis, Jean Marc ^b   Launoy, Guy ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Discrete choice models; General practitioners' preferences; Mass screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FRANCE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; OCCULT BLOOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33749868065     PISSN: 16187598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0339-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abelson J, Lomas J (1990) Do health service organizations and community health centres have higher disease prevention and health promotion levels than fee-for-service practices? Can Med Assoc J 142:575-581
2. Allison JE, Tekawa IS, Ransom LJ, Adrain AL (1996) A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal cancer screening. N Engl J Med 334:155-159
3. Berchi C, Bouvier V, Reaud JM, Launoy G (2004) Cost-effectiveness analysis of two strategies for mass screening for colorectal cancer in France. Health Econ 13:227-238
4. Cairns J, van der Pol M, Lloyd A (2002) Decision making heuristics and the elicitation of preferences: being fast and frugal about the future. Health Econ 11:655-658
5. Castiglione G, Sala P, Ciatto S, Grazzini G, Mazzota A, Rossetti C et al (1994) Comparative analysis of results of guaiac and immunochemical tests for faecal occult blood in colorectal cancer screening in two oncological institutions. Eur J Cancer Prev 3:399-405
6. Cole SR, Young GP, Byrne D, Guy JR, Morcom J (2002) Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner. J Med Screen 9:147-152
7. Drakopoulos SA (1994) Hierarchical choice in economics. J Econ Surv 8:133-153
8. Faivre J, Arveux P, Milan C, Durand G, Lamour J, Bedenne L (1991) Participation in mass screening for colorectal cancer: results of screening and rescreening from the Burgundy study. Eur J Cancer Prev 1:49-55
9. Farrar S, Ryan M (1999) Response ordering effects: a methodological issue in conjoint analysis. Health Econ 8:75-79
10. Farrar S, Ryan M, Ross D, Ludbrook A (2000) Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: an application to clinical service developments. Soc Sci Med 50:63-75
11. Gyrd-Hansen D, Slothuus U (2002) The citizen's preferences for financing public health care: a Danish survey. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2:25-36
12. Gyrd-Hansen D, Sogaard J (2001) Analysing public preferences for cancer screening programmes. Health Econ 10:617-634
13. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH et al (1996) Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348:1472-1477
14. Hillman AL, Nuamah I (1998) Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid Managed Care. Am J Public Health 88:1699-1701
15. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O (1996) Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348:1467-1471
16. Launoy G, Veret JL, Richir B, Reaud JM, Ollivier V, Valla A et al (1993) Involvement of general practitioners in mass screening. Experience of a colorectal cancer mass screening programme in the Calvados region ( France). Eur J Cancer Prev 2:229-232
17. Launoy G, Herbert C, Vallée JP, Desoubeaux N, Réaud JM, Ollivier V et al (1996) Le dépistage de masse du cancer colorectal en France. Expéri ence auprès de 165 000 per son nes dans le Calvados. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 20:228-236
18. Launoy G, Herbert C (1998) Le dépistage de masse du cancer colorectal. L'état actuel en France. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 22: S34-39
19. Launoy G, Bertrand H, Berchi C, Talbourdet V, Guizard AV, Bouvier V, Caces E (2005) Evaluation of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test with automated reading in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average-risk population. Int J Cancer 115:493-496
20. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR et al (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 328:1365-1371
21. McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In P. Zarembka, Frontiers in econometrics. Academic: New York
22. Nexoe J, Gyrd-Hansen D, Kragstrup J, Kristiansen IV, Nielsen JB (2002) Danish GPs' perception of disease risk and benefit of prevention. Fam Pract 19:3-6
23. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB (2002) Cancer incidence in five continents, vol VIII. IARC: Lyon
24. Remontet L, Estève J, Bouvier AM et al (2003) Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1978-2000. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 51:3-30
25. Ryan M (2000) Using choice experiments to elicit preferences: current practice and future challenges. In: Models of the patient-physician relationship and methods for eliciting patients' preferences, no. 114. Ateliers de formation INSERM: France
26. Scott A, Hall J (1995) Evaluating the effects of GP remuneration: problems and prospects. Health Policy 31:183-195
27. Scott A (2001) Eliciting GPs' preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. J Health Econ 20:329-347
28. Scott A, Vick S (1999) Patients, doctors and contracts: an application of principal-agent theory to the doctor-patient relationship. Scott J Polit Econ 46:111-134
29. Taylor ML, Anderson RA (2002) Colorectal cancer screening: physician attitudes and practices. Wis Med J 101:39-43
30. Tazi A, Faivre J, Lejeune C, Benhamiche AM, Dassonville F (1999) Performances du test Hemoccult dans le dépistage des can cers et des adénomes colorectaux. Résultats de cinq campagnes de dépistage en Saône-et-Loire. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 23:575-580
31. Thurstone L (1927) A law of comparative judgement. Psychol Rev 34:273-286
32. Truong TP, Hensher DA (1985) Measurement of travel time values and opportunity cost from a discrete choice model. Econ J 95:438-451