Not-So-Foreign Languages: The Critical Inquiry Approach to Moving beyond Disciplines

Beyond the Boundaries: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Learning and Teaching

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 33-46

  Osborn, Terry A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906003318     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Berman, R.A. (2000). Foreign cultural literacy: Language learning and cultural studies. In M. Kecht & K. von Hammerstein (Eds.), Languages across the curriculum: Interdisciplinary structures and internationalized education (pp. 63-78). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Languages Resource Center.
2. Biron, C. (1998). Bringing the standards to life: Points of departure. Foreign Language Annals 37(4), pp. 584-594.
3. Byrnes, H. (2000). Languages across the curriculum—intradepartmental curriculum construction: Issues and options. In M. Kecht & K. von Hammerstein (Eds.), Languages across the curriculum: Interdisciplinary structures and internationalized education (pp. 151-176). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Languages Resource Center.
4. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Gehlker, M., Gozzi, M. L., and Zeller, I. (1999). Teaching the Holocaust in the foreign language classroom. NECTFL Review, 46, pp. 20-29.
6. Giroux, H. A. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture and schooling. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7. Goldhagen, D.J. (1996). Hitler's willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Random House.
8. Herman, D.M. (2002). "Our patriotic duty": Insights from professional history, 1890-1920. In T. A. Osborn (Ed.), The future of foreign language education in the United States (pp. 1-30). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
9. Kecht, M., & von Hammerstein, K. (Eds.). (2000). Languages across the curriculum: Interdisciplinary structures and internationalized education. Columbus, OH: National East Asian Languages Resource Center.
10. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Leaver, B.L., & Bilstein, P.M. (2000). Content, language, and task in content-based programs. In M. Kecht and K. von Hammerstein (Eds.), Languages across the curriculum: Interdisciplinary structures and internationalized education (pp. 79-118). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Languages Resource Center.
12. Lessow-Hurley, J. (1996). The foundations of dual language instruction (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
13. Martel, A. 2000. Paradoxes of plurilingualism. For better? For worse? And beyond? In R. Phillipson (Ed.), Rights to language: Equity, power, and education. Celebrating the 60th birthday ofTove Skutnabb-Kangas (pp. 151-159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (1996). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.
15. Ortega, L. (1999). Language and equality: Ideological and structural constraints in foreign language education in the U.S. In T. Huebner & K. A. Davis (Eds.), Sociopolitical perspectives on language policy and planning in the USA (pp. 243-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
16. Osborn, T. A. (1998). Providing access: Foreign language learners and genre theory. Foreign Language Annals, 32(1), pp. 40-47.
17. Osborn, T. A. (2000). Critical reflection and the foreign language classroom. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
18. Overfield, D. M. (1997). From the margins to the mainstream: Foreign language education and community-based learning. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), pp. 485-491.
19. Reagan, T. G., & Osborn, T. A. (2002). The foreign language educator in society: Toward a critical pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Reyes, X.A. (2002). Authentic "migratory" experiences for language learners: Macroconte×tualization as critical pedagogy. In T.A. Osborn (Ed.), The future of foreign language education in the United States (pp. 167-178). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
21. Roca, A. (1999). Foreign language policy and planning in higher education: The case of the state of Florida. In T. Huebner & K. A. Davis (Eds.), Sociopolitical perspectives on language policy and planning in the USA (pp. 297-312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
22. Scholl, I. (1983). The White Rose: Munich 1942-43 (A.R. Schultz, Trans.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
23. Solomon, J. (1997, September). Language teachers align curricula with standards: Preliminary results of a national survey. ERIC/CLL News Bulletin, 23(1), pp. 1, 6-7.
24. Steinbach, P. 1990. Gedenkstätte deutscher Widerstand/The German Resistance Memorial Center: Exhibition resistance to national socialism (J. M. Grossman, Trans.). Berlin: Helmich KG.
25. Swaffar, J. (2000). Doing things with language: Acquiring discourse literacy through languages across the curriculum. In M. Kecht & K. von Hammer-stein (Eds.), Languages across the curriculum: Interdisciplinary structures and internationalized education (pp. 119-150). Columbus, OH: National East Asian Languages Resource Center.
26. Tollefson, J. W. (Ed.). (2002). Language policies in education: Critical issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Wiley, T.G. (2002). Accessing language rights in education: A brief history of the U.S. context. In J.W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 39-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.