Comparative efficacy and safety of the Ambu® AuraOnce ™ laryngeal mask airway during general anaesthesia in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anaesthesia

Volumn 69, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1023-1032

  Baidya, D K ^a   Chandralekha, ^a   Darlong, V ^a   Pandey, R ^a   Maitra, S ^a   Khanna, P ^b  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING AGENT;

ADULT; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DATA BASE; DEVICE SAFETY; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPHONIA; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LARYNGEAL MASK; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESPIRATION CONTROL; REVIEW; SORE THROAT; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AIR PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; LARYNX; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT SAFETY; PHARYNGITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905996003     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12682     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. van Zundert TC, Brimacombe JR, Ferson DZ, Bacon DR, Wilkinson DJ,. Archie Brain: celebrating 30 years of development in laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 1375-85.
2. Antloga K, Meszaros J, Malchesky PS, McDonnell GE,. Prion disease and medical devices. ASAIO Journal 2000; 46: S69-72.
3. Clery G, Brimacombe J, Stone T, Keller C, Curtis S,. Routine cleaning and autoclaving does not remove protein deposits from reusable laryngeal mask devices. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 97: 1189-91. (Pubitemid 37158712)
4. Bell SF, Morris NG, Rao A, Wilkes AR, Goodwin N,. A randomised crossover trial comparing a single-use polyvinyl chloride laryngeal mask airway with a single-use silicone laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 1337-42.
5. Hagberg CA, Jensen FS, Genzwuerker HV, et al. A multicenter study of the Ambu laryngeal mask in nonparalyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2005; 101: 1862-6. (Pubitemid 41720653)
6. Shariffuddin II, Wang CY,. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 82-5. (Pubitemid 350233213)
7. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I,. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2005; 5: 13.
8. Baker PA, Brunette KE, Byrnes CA, Thompson JM,. A prospective randomized trial comparing supraglottic airways for flexible bronchoscopy in children. Pediatric Anesthesia 2010; 20: 831-8.
9. Gernoth C, Jandewerth O, Contzen M, Hinkelbein J, Genzwürker H,. Comparison of two different laryngeal mask models for airway management in patients with immobilization of the cervical spine. Der Anaesthesist 2006; 55: 263-9.
10. Sudhir G, Redfern D, Hall JE, Wilkes AR, Cann C,. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 719-22. (Pubitemid 46929967)
11. ® Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Classic in anesthetized, spontaneously breathing patients. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2007; 35: 57-62.
12. Suzanna AB, Liu CY, Rozaidi SW, Ooi JS,. Comparison between LMA-Classic and AMBU Aura Once laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective general anaesthesia with positive pressure ventilation. Medical Journal of Malaysia 2011; 66: 304-7.
13. Francksen H, Bein B, Cavus E, et al. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2007; 24: 134-40. (Pubitemid 46058450)
14. Lõpez AM, Valero R, Bovaira P, Pons M, Sala-Blanch X, Anglada T,. A clinical evaluation of four disposable laryngeal masks in adult patients. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2008; 20: 514-20.
15. Strydom CS, Le Roux PJ,. A clinical comparison of disposable airway devices. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2008; 14: 31-6.
16. Williams DL, Zeng JM, Alexander KD, Andrews DT,. Randomised comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce laryngeal mask and the LMA Unique laryngeal mask Airway in spontaneously breathing adults. Anesthesiology Research and Practice 2012; 2012: 405812.
17. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R,. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1999; 82: 286-7. (Pubitemid 29057634)
18. Beleña JM, Núñez M, Anta D, et al. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2013; 30: 119-23.
19. ™ in patients undergoing dental surgery. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 986-90.
20. Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK,. Comparison of LMA Supreme and LMA Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2014; 31: 266-73.