Parallel imaging-based reduction of acoustic noise for clinical magnetic resonance imaging

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 620-626

  Pierre, Eric Y ^a   Grodzki, David ^b   Aandal, Gunhild ^c,d   Heismann, Bjoern ^b   Badve, Chaitra ^c   Gulani, Vikas ^a,c   Sunshine, Jeffrey L ^c   Schluchter, Mark ^e   Liu, Kecheng ^f   Griswold, Mark A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital   (Norway)

^e CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

acoustic noise; MRI; parallel imaging; pulse sequence optimization

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WAVEFORM; FEASIBILITY STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905826232     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000062     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Quirk ME, Letendre AJ, Ciottone RA, et al. Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;170:463-466. (Pubitemid 19035674)
2. Shellock FG, Morisoli SM, Ziarati M. Measurement of acoustic noise during MR imaging: evaluation of six "worst-case" pulse sequences. Radiology. 1994;191:91-93.
3. McJury M, Blug A, Joerger C, et al. Acoustic noise levels during magnetic resonance imaging scanning at 1.5 T. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:413-415. (Pubitemid 24125398)
4. McJury M. Acoustic noise levels generated during high field MR imaging. Clin Radiol. 1995;50:331-334.
5. Bandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Van Kylen J, et al. Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise. Magn Reson Med. 1998;39: 410-416. (Pubitemid 28128384)
6. Amaro E, Williams SCR, Shergill SS, et al. Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:497-510. (Pubitemid 35257756)
7. Tomasi D, Caparelli E, Chang L, et al. fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks. Neuroimage. 2005;27:377-386. (Pubitemid 41074839)
8. Chonde DB, Abolmaali N, Arabasz G, et al. Effect of MRI acoustic noise on cerebral fludeoxyglucose uptake in simultaneous MR-PET imaging. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:302-312.
9. Lauer AM, El-Sharkawy A-MM, Kraitchman DL, et al. MRI acoustic noise can harm experimental and companion animals. J Magn Reson imaging. 2012;36: 743-747.
10. Hedeen R, Edelstein W. Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers. Magn Reson Med. 2005;37:7-10.
11. Katsunuma A, Takamori H, Sakakura Y, et al. Quiet MRI with novel acoustic noise reduction. MAGMA. 2002;13:139-144.
12. Edelstein WA, Hedeen RA, Mallozzi RP, et al. Making MRI quieter. Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;20:155-163. (Pubitemid 34553181)
13. Edelstein WA, Kidane TK, Taracila V, et al. Active-passive gradient shielding for MRI acoustic noise reduction. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:1013-1017. (Pubitemid 40627775)
14. Cho ZH, Chung ST, Chung JY, et al. A new silent magnetic resonance imaging using a rotating DC gradient. Magn Reson Med. 1998;39:317-321. (Pubitemid 28099152)
15. Mansfield P, Haywood B. Principles of active acoustic control in gradient coil design. MAGMA. 2000;10:147-151. (Pubitemid 30337349)
16. Haywood B, Chapman B, Mansfield P. Model gradient coil employing active acoustic control for MRI. MAGMA. 2007;20:223-231.
17. Li M, Rudd B, Lim TC, et al. In situ active control of noise in a 4 T MRI scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;34:662-669.
18. Shou X, Chen X, Derakhshan J, et al. The suppression of selected acoustic frequencies in MRI. Appl Acoust. 2010;71:191-200.
19. Hennel F, Girard F, Loenneker T. "Silent" MRI with soft gradient pulses. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:6-10. (Pubitemid 29325606)
20. De Zwart J, Vangelderen P, Kellman P, et al. Reduction of gradient acoustic noise in MRI using SENSE-EPI. Neuroimage. 2002;16:1151-1155.
21. Witzel T, Wald LL. Methods for functional brain imaging. 2011.
22. Zapp J, Schmitter S, Schad LR. Sinusoidal echo-planar imaging with parallel acquisition technique for reduced acoustic noise in auditory fMRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:581-588.
23. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn ResonMed. 2002;47:1202-1210. (Pubitemid 34587412)
24. Robson PM, Grant AK, Madhuranthakam AJ, et al. Comprehensive quantification of signal-to-noise ratio and g-factor for image-based and k-space-based parallel imaging reconstructions. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:895-907.
25. Grodzki D, Heismann B. Quiet T1-weighted head scanning using PETRA. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of ISRMRM. vol 21. Salt Lake City, UT: 2013:456.
26. Chandarana H, Feng L, Block TK, et al. Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:10-16.