Effect of MRI acoustic noise on cerebral fludeoxyglucose uptake in simultaneous MR-PET imaging

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 302-312

  Chonde, Daniel B ^a,b   Abolmaali, Nasreddin ^c   Arabasz, Grae ^a   Guimaraes, Alexander R ^a   Catana, Ciprian ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

auditory cortex; MRI; multimodality imaging; PET; physiological interference

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARAMETRIC TEST; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUPINE POSITION;

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PILOT PROJECTS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 84876295637     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182839fbc     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Schlemmer HP, Pichler BJ, Schmand M, et al. Simultaneous MR/PET imaging of the human brain: feasibility study. Radiology. 2008;248:1028-1035.
2. Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M, et al. First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with onco-logic diagnoses. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:845-855.
3. Catana C, Benner T, van der Kouwe A, et al. MRI-assisted PET motion correction for neurologic studies in an integrated MR-PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:154-161.
4. Catana C, van der Kouwe A, Benner T, et al. Toward implementing an MRI-based PET attenuation-correction method for neurologic studies on the MR-PET brain prototype. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1431-1438.
5. Hofmann M, Steinke F, Scheel V, et al. MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI: a novel approach combining pattern recognition and atlas registration. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1875-1883.
6. Hu Z, Ojha N, Renisch S, et al. MR-based attenuation correction for a whole-body sequential PET/MR system. 2009 IEEE; 2009:3508-3512. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).
7. Meltzer CC, Zubieta JK, Links JM, et al. MR-based correction of brain PET measurements for heterogeneous gray matter radioactivity distribution. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16:650-658.
8. Fung EK, Planeta-Wilson B, Mulnix T, et al. A multimodal approach to image-derived input functions for brain PET. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997). 2009:2710-2714.
9. Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, et al. Effects of low-field magnetic stimulation on brain glucose metabolism. Neuroimage. 2010;51:623-628.
10. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, et al. Resting brain metabolic activity in a 4 tesla magnetic field. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:701-705.
11. Waxman A, Herholz K, Lewis D, et al. Society of Nuclear Medicine procedure guideline for FDG PET brain imaging version 1.0. Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2009.
12. Foster JR, Hall DA, Summerfield AQ, et al. Sound-level measurements and calculations of safe noise dosage during EPI at 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:157-163.
13. Fox PT, Raichle ME, Mintun MA, et al. Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity. Science. 1988;241:462-464.
14. Belin P, Zatorre RJ, Hoge R, et al. Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 1999;10:417-429.
15. Cho ZH, Chung SC, Lim DW, et al. Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: a study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices. Magn Reson Med. 1998;39:331-335.
16. Schmitter S, Diesch E, Amann M, et al. Silent echo-planar imaging for auditory FMRI. MAGMA. 2008;21:317-325.
17. Byars LG, Sibomana M, Burbar Z, et al. Variance reduction on randoms from coincidence histograms for the HRRT. 2005 IEEE; 2005:2622-2626. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
18. Watson CC. New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2000;47:1587-1594.
19. 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:242.
20. 18F]FDG PET brain examination for diagnosis of brain glioma. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13:754-758.
21. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, et al. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp. 1994;2:189-210.
22. Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage. 2012;62:774-781.
23. Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, et al. An automated method for neuroan-atomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1233-1239.
24. Yoon HJ, Park KW, Jeong YJ, et al. Correlation between neuropsychological tests and hypoperfusion in MCI patients: anatomical labeling using xjView and Talairach Daemon software. Ann Nucl Med.2012;26:656-664.
25. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002;33:341-355.
26. Aydin MD, Ungoren MK, Aydin N, et al. The effects of impulse noise on the epithelial cells of the choroid plexus. Turk Neurosurg. 2011;21:191-196.
27. Paus T, Jech R, Thompson CJ, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 1997;17:3178-3184.
28. Fox P, Ingham R, George MS, et al. Imaging human intra-cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS. Neuroreport. 1997;8:2787-2791.
29. Siebner HR, Takano B, Peinemann A, et al. Continuous transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a suitable tool for imaging regional excitability of the human cortex. Neuroimage. 2001;14:883-890.
30. Siebner HR, Peller M, Willoch F, et al. Imaging functional activation of the auditory cortex during focal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex in normal subjects. Neurosci Lett. 1999;270:37-40.
31. Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Fink G, et al. An interactive technique for three-dimensional image registration: validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:2011-2018.
32. Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, et al. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:512-528.
33. Lauter JL, Herscovitch P, Formby C, et al. Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by positron emission tomography. Hear Res. 1985; 20:199-205.
34. Wessinger CM, Buonocore MH, Kussmaul CL, et al. Tonotopy in human auditory cortex examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 1997;5:18-25.
35. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RBH, et al. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999; 8:272-284.
36. 18F]FDG PET: a clinical validation of statistical parametric mapping. Neuroimage. 1999;9:63-80.
37. Krishna BS, Semple MN. Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoi-dally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84:255-273.
38. Huffman RF, Henson OW Jr. The descending auditory pathway and acoustico-motor systems: connections with the inferior colliculus. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1990;15:295-323.