Accuracy of pulse oximeter perfusion index in thoracic epidural anesthesia under basal general anesthesia

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1728-1734

  Xu, Zifeng ^a   Zhang, Jianhai ^b   Xia, Yunfei ^b   Deng, Xiaoming ^c  

^a School of Medicine   (China)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Combined general; Pleth variability index; Pulse pressure variation; Stroke volume variation; Thoracic epidural anesthesia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905650795     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19405901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baron JF, Bertrand M, Barre E, Godet G, Mundler O, Coriat P and Viars P. Combined epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery. Anesthesiology 1991; 75: 611-618.
2. Kabon B, Fleischmann E, Treschan T, Taguchi A, Kapral S and Kurz A. Thoracic epidural anesthesia increases tissue oxygenation during major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1812-1817.
3. Booke M, Fingerhut D, Wendt M, Oberpennig F and Lawin P. Improvement in hemodynamic stability and perioperative management from a combination of general and epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: A1056.
4. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M and Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing offpump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128: 848-854.
5. Michard F and Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4: 282-289.
6. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, Prasser C and Keyl C. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 658-665.
7. Desebbe O and Cannesson M. Using ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations to optimize patient fluid status. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008; 21: 772-778.
8. Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG and Pickkers P. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 395-401.
9. Shang AB, Kozikowski RT, Winslow AW and Weininger S. Development of a standardized method for motion testing in pulse oximeters. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: S66-77.
10. Cannesson M, Delannoy B, Morand A, Rosamel P, Attof Y, Bastien O and Lehot JJ. Does the Pleth variability index indicate the respiratoryinduced variation in the plethysmogram and arterial pressure waveforms? Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1189-1194.
11. Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, Delannoy B, Robin J, Bastien O and Lehot JJ. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 200-206.
12. Hood JA and Wilson RJ. Pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 1058-1063.
13. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, Lemos IP, Auler JO Jr and Michard F. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11: R100.
14. Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Hachemi M, Jacques D, Bastien O and Lehot JJ. Respiratory variations in pulse oximeter waveform amplitude are influenced by venous return in mechanically ventilated patients under general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24: 245-251.
15. Preau S, Dewavrin F, Soland V, Bortolotti P, Colling D, Chagnon JL, Durocher A and Saulnier F. Hemodynamic changes during a deep inspiration maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Cardiol Res Pract 2012; 2012: 191807.
16. Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MM, Wietasch JK, Hendriks HG and Scheeren TW. Comparison of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waveform-based dynamic preload variables in assessing fluid responsiveness and dynamic arterial tone in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 940-946.
17. Suryaprakash S, Chakravarthy M, Gautam M, Gandhi A, Jawali V, Patil T, Jayaprakash K, Pandey S and Muniraju G. Effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia on oxygen delivery and utilization in cardiac surgical patients scheduled to undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective study. Ann Card Anaesth 2011; 14: 192-196.
18. Pintaric TS, Potocnik I, Hadzic A, Stupnik T, Pintaric M and Novak Jankovic V. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural with paravertebral block on perioperative analgesia and hemodynamic stability in patients having open lung surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36: 256-260.
19. Marik PE, Baram M and Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134: 172-178.
20. Bliacheriene F, Machado SB, Fonseca EB, Otsuke D, Auler JO Jr and Michard F. Pulse pressure variation as a tool to detect hypovolaemia during pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 1268-1272.
21. Feldman JM, Sussman E, Singh D and Friedman BJ. Is the pleth variability index a surrogate for pulse pressure variation in a pediatric population undergoing spine fusion? Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22: 250-255.
22. Renner J, Broch O, Gruenewald M, Scheewe J, Francksen H, Jung O, Steinfath M and Bein B. Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants using pleth variability index. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 582-589.
23. Takeyama M, Matsunaga A, Kakihana Y, Masuda M, Kuniyoshi T and Kanmura Y. Impact of skin incision on the pleth variability index. J Clin Monit Comput 2011; 25: 215-221.