Development of a standardized method for motion testing in pulse oximeters

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 105, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2007, Pages

  Shang, Allan B ^a,b   Kozikowski, Raymond T ^b   Winslow, Andrew W ^b   Weininger, Sandy ^c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD; CALIBRATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINGER; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); OXIMETRY; PILOT STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STANDARD; VASCULARIZATION;

ARTIFACTS; CALIBRATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINGERS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MOVEMENT; OXIMETRY; OXYGEN; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 79952154280     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278132.12257.cd     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Shang AB. An investigational study to assess the performance of pulse oximeters under the presence of motion artifact. Anesth Analg 2002;94:S107
2. Jopling MW, Mannheimer PD, Bebout DE. Issues in the laboratory evaluation of pulse oximeter performance. Anesth Analg 2002;94:S62-8 (Pubitemid 34033564)
3. Severinghaus JW. History and recent developments in pulse oximetry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 1993;214:105-11 (Pubitemid 23198278)
4. Langton JA, Hanning CD. Effect of motion artefact on pulse oximeters: evaluation of four instruments and finger probes. Br J Anaesth 1990;65:564-70 (Pubitemid 20338009)
5. Plummer JL, Zakaria AZ, Ilsley AH, Fronsko RR, Owen H. Evaluation of the influence of movement on saturation readings from pulse oximeters. Anaesthesia 1995;50:423-6
6. Tobin RM, Pologe JA, Batchelder PB. A characterization of motion affecting pulse oximetry in 350 patients. Anesth Analg 2002;94:S54-61 (Pubitemid 34033563)
7. Gehring H, Hornberger C, Matz H, Konecny E, Schmucker P. The effects of motion artifact and low perfusion on the performance of a new generation of pulse oximeters in volunteers undergoing hypoxemia. Respir Care 2002;47:48-60
8. Barker SJ, Shah NK. The effects of motion on the performance of pulse oximeters in volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997;86:101-8 (Pubitemid 27044007)
9. Barker SJ. "Motion-resistant" pulse oximetry: a comparison of new and old models. Anesth Analg 2002;95:967-72
10. Kästke SW, Konecny E. Determining the artifact sensitivity of recent pulse oximeters during laboratory benchmarking. J Clin Monit Comput 2000;16:509-22 (Pubitemid 32700558)