Breast DCE-MRI: Influence of Postcontrast timing on automated lesion kinetics assessments and discrimination of benign and malignant lesions

Academic Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1195-1203

  Partridge, Savannah C ^a   Stone, Karen M ^a,b   Strigel, Roberta M ^a,c   DeMartini, Wendy B ^a,c   Peacock, Sue ^a   Lehman, Constance D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Seattle Cancer Care Alliance   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Differential diagnosis; Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE MRI); Kinetic analysis; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Postcontrast timing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SIZE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; KINETICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC USE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905593563     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. DeMartini W., Lehman C., Partridge S. Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: a review of evidence-based clinical applications. Acad Radiol 2008, 15(4):408-416.
2. Kuhl C.K. Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 2007, 244(3):672-691.
3. Saslow D., Boetes C., Burke W., et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007, 57(2):75-89.
4. ® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA. American College of Radiology 2013.
5. Mahoney M.C., Gatsonis C., Hanna L., et al. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging. Radiology 2012, 264(1):51-58.
6. Demartini W.B., Kurland B.F., Gutierrez R.L., et al. Probability of malignancy for lesions detected on breast MRI: a predictive model incorporating BI-RADS imaging features and patient characteristics. Eur Radiol 2011, 21(8):1609-1617.
7. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 1999, 211(1):101-110.
8. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006, 238(1):42-53.
9. Wang L.C., DeMartini W.B., Partridge S.C., et al. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193(3):826-831.
10. Williams T.C., DeMartini W.B., Partridge S.C., et al. Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 2007, 244(1):94-103.
11. American College of Radiology Breast MRI Accreditation Program Requirements. Available at:. Accessed June 4, 2014. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Accreditation/BreastMRI.
12. Weinreb J., Wilcox P.A., Hayden J., et al. ACR MRI accreditation: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J Am Coll Radiol 2005, 2(6):494-503.
13. Mann R.M., Kuhl C.K., Kinkel K., et al. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 2008, 18(7):1307-1318.
14. Hendrick R.E. Breast MRI: fundamentals and technical aspects 2008, Springer, New York, NY.
15. DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M., Clarke-Pearson D.L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988, 44(3):837-845.
16. El Khouli R.H., Macura K.J., Barker P.B., et al. Relationship of temporal resolution to diagnostic performance for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 30(5):999-1004.
17. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007, 244(2):356-378.
18. Moon M., Cornfeld D., Weinreb J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2009, 17(2):351-362.
19. Gutierrez R.L., Strigel R.M., Partridge S.C., et al. Dynamic breast MRI: does lower temporal resolution negatively affect clinical kinetic analysis?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012, 199(3):703-708.
20. El Khouli R.H., Macura K.J., Jacobs M.A., et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193(4):W295-W300.
21. Huang W., Tudorica L.A., Li X., et al. Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2011, 261(2):394-403.
22. Chen H, Olson ML, Partridge SC, Kerwin W. Reducing the scan time in quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast using the extended graphical model. International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 21st Annual Meeting, April 22, 2013. Salt Lake City, UT. 3059.
23. Jansen S.A., Shimauchi A., Zak L., et al. Kinetic curves of malignant lesions are not consistent across MRI systems: need for improved standardization of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193(3):832-839.