Dynamic breast MRI: Does lower temporal resolution negatively affect clinical kinetic analysis?

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 199, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 703-708

  Gutierrez, Robert L ^a   Strigel, Roberta M ^b   Partridge, Savannah C ^c,d   DeMartini, Wendy B ^c,d   Eby, Peter R ^e   Stone, Karen M ^c,d   Peacock, Sue ^c,d   Lehman, Constance D ^c,d  

^a Department of Radiology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE   (United States)

^e VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast MRI; Clinical kinetic analysis; Temporal resolution

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST LESION; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865613113     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7836     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS, Abe H, Schmidt RA, Newstead GM. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59:747-754 (Pubitemid 351501939)
2. Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 2005; 236:789-800 (Pubitemid 41170839)
3. Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:965-974
4. Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, et al. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25:104-112 (Pubitemid 46095205)
5. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006; 238:42-53 (Pubitemid 43010579)
6. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 2004; 292:2735-2742 (Pubitemid 39628252)
7. Vomweg TW, Teifke A, Kunz RP, et al. Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise. Eur Radiol 2004; 14:1732-1742 (Pubitemid 39386619)
8. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110 (Pubitemid 29161739)
9. Veltman J, Stoutjesdijk M, Mann R, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: the value of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from fast dynamic imaging during initial enhancement in classifying lesions. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:1123-1133
10. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part 1. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007; 244:356-378 (Pubitemid 47080868)
11. American College of Radiology Website. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): breast MRI accreditation program. www.acr.org. Accessed May 10, 2012
12. Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:1307-1318
13. Wang LC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR 2009; 193:826-831
14. Demartini WB, Lehman CD, Peacock S, Russell MT. Computer-aided detection applied to breast MRI: assessment of CAD-generated enhancement and tumor sizes in breast cancers before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acad Radiol 2005; 12:806-814 (Pubitemid 41008673)
15. Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 2007; 244:94-103 (Pubitemid 46981962)
16. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK, et al. BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging, 1st ed. In: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS-breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
17. Szabó BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, Boné B. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast: analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 2003; 44:379-386
18. Ikeda O, Yamashita Y, Morishita S, et al. Characterization of breast masses by dynamic enhanced MR imaging: a logistic regression analysis. Acta Radiol 1999; 40:585-592 (Pubitemid 129567274)
19. Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS, et al. DCEMRI of breast lesions: is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? Med Phys 2008; 35:3102-3109 (Pubitemid 351904514)
20. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR 2000; 175:35-43 (Pubitemid 30415534)