Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 234, Issue , 2014, Pages 82-91

  Agrillo, Christian ^a   Bisazza, Angelo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Animal cognition; Birds; Continuous variables; Fish; Mammals; Numerical competence

Indexed keywords

APTITUDE; BIRD; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FISH; LANGUAGE; MAMMAL; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TRAINING; ANIMAL; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; MATHEMATICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; TEACHING;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; MATHEMATICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TEACHING;

EID: 84905372560     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.027     Document Type: Review

References (113)

1. Agrillo C., Dadda M., Serena G., Bisazza A. Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn 2008, 11(3):495-503.
2. Agrillo C., Dadda M., Serena G. Choice of female groups by male mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Ethology 2008, 114(5):479-488.
3. Agrillo C., Dadda M. Discrimination of the larger shoal in the poeciliid fish Girardinus falcatus. Ethol Ecol Evol 2007, 19:145-157.
4. Agrillo C., Dadda M., Serena G., Bisazza A. Use of number by fish. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(3):e4786.
5. Agrillo C., Miletto Petrazzini M.E., Bisazza A. Numerical acuity of fish is improved in the presence of moving targets, but only in the subitizing range. Anim Cogn 2014, 17:307-316.
6. Agrillo C., Miletto Petrazzini M.E., Tagliapietra C., Bisazza A. Inter-specific differences in numerical abilities among teleost fish. Front Psychol 2012, 3:483. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012. 3 0048.
7. Agrillo C., Miletto Petrazzini M.E., Piffer L., Dadda M., Bisazza A. A new training procedure for studying discrimination learning in fishes. Behav Brain Res 2012, 230:343-348.
8. Agrillo C., Miletto Petrazzini M.E. The importance of replication in comparative psychology: the lesson of elephant quantity judgments. Front Psych 2012, 3:181. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012. 1 0018.
9. Agrillo C., Piffer L., Adriano A. Individual differences in non-symbolic numerical estimation predict mathematical abilities but contradict ATOM. Behav Brain Funct 2013, 9:26.
10. Agrillo C., Piffer L., Bisazza A., Butterworth B. Evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(2):e31923.
11. Agrillo C., Piffer L., Bisazza A. Large number discrimination by fish. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(12):e15232.
12. Agrillo C., Piffer L., Bisazza A. Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish. Cognition 2011, 119:281-287.
13. Agrillo C., Piffer L. Musicians outperform non-musicians in magnitude estimation: evidence of a common processing mechanism for time, space and numbers. Quart J Exp Psychol 2012, 65:2321-2332.
14. Al Aïn S., Giret N., Grand M., Kreutzer M., Bovet D. The discrimination of discrete and continuous amounts in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Cogn 2009, 12:145-154.
15. Arsalidou M., Taylor M.J. Does 2+2=4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations. NeuroImage 2011, 54(3):2382-2393.
16. Ashkenazi S., Mark-Zigdon N., Henik A. Do subitizing deficits in developmental dyscalculia involve pattern recognition weakness?. Dev Sci 2013, 16(1):35-46.
17. Baker J.M., Morath J., Rodzon K.S., Jordan K.E. A shared system of representation governing quantity discrimination in canids. Front Psychol 2012, 3:387. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00387.
18. Baker J.M., Shivik J., Jordan K.E. Tracking of food quantity by coyotes (Canis latrans). Behav Process 2011, 88:72-75.
19. Barnard A.M., Hughes K.D., Gerhardt R.R., DiVincenti L., Bovee J.M., Cantlon J.F. Inherently analog quantity representations in olive baboons (Papio anubis). Front Psychol 2013, 4:253. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00253.
20. Benson-Amram S., Heinen V.K., Dryer S.L., Holekamp K.E. Numerical assessment and individual call discrimination by wild spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta). Anim Behav 2011, 82:743-752.
21. Beran M.J., Evans T.A., Harris E.H. Perception of food amount by chimpanzees based on the number, size, contour length, and visibility of items. Anim Behav 2008, 75:1793-1802.
22. Beran M.J., Evans T.A., Leighty K.A., Harris E.H., Rice D. Summation and quantity judgments of sequentially presented sets by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Am J Primat 2008, 70:191-194.
23. Beran M.J. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond to nonvisible sets after one-by-one addition and removal of items. J Comp Psychol 2004, 118:25-36.
24. Beran M.J. Monkeys (Macaca mulatta and Cebus apella) track, enumerate, and compare multiple sets of moving items. J Exp Psych Anim Behav Proc 2008, 34:63-74.
25. Beran M.J. Quantity perception by adult humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) as a function of stimulus organization. Int J Comp Psych 2006, 19:386-397.
26. Beran M.J. Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psych 2001, 155:181-191.
27. Biro D., Matsuzawa T. Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero. Anim Cogn 2001, 4:193-199.
28. Bisazza A., Serena G., Piffer L., Agrillo C. Ontogeny of numerical abilities in guppies. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(11):e15516.
29. Bogale B.A., Kamata N., Mioko K., Sugita S. Quantity discrimination in jungle crows, Corvus macrorhynchos. Anim Behav 2011, 82:635-641.
30. Boysen S.T., Berntson G.G. Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 1989, 103:23-31.
31. Brannon E.M., Terrace H.S. Ordering of the numerosities 1-9 by monkeys. Science 1998, 282:746-749.
32. Brannon E.M., Wusthoff C.J., Gallistel C.R., Gibbon J. Subtraction in the pigeon: evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychol Sci 2001, 12(3):238-243.
33. Buckingham J.N., Wong B.B.M., Rosenthal G.G. Shoaling decision in female swordtails: how do fish gauge group size. Behaviour 2007, 144:1333-1346.
34. Call J. Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psych 2000, 114:136-147.
35. Campitelli G., Gobet F., Head K., Buckley M., Parker A. Brain localization of memory chunks in chessplayers. Int J Neurosci 2007, 117:1641-1659.
36. Cantlon J.F., Brannon E.M. Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychol Sci 2006, 17(5):401-406.
37. Cantlon J.F., Brannon E.M. Basic math in monkeys and college students. PLoS Biol 2007, 5(12):e328.
38. Cantlon J.F., Brannon E.M. How much does number matter to a monkey (Macaca mulatta)?. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 2007, 33(1):32-41.
39. Chassy P., Grodd W. Comparison of quantities: core and format dependent regions as revealed by FMRI. Cereb Cortex 2012, 22:1420-1430.
40. Cheek J.M., Smith L.R. Music training and mathematics achievement. Adolescence 1999, 34:759-761.
41. Davis H., Bradford S.A. Counting behaviour by rats in a simulated natural environment. Ethology 1986, 73:265-280.
42. Davis H. Discrimination of the number three by a raccoon (Procyon lotor). Anim Learn Behav 1984, 12:409-413.
43. Emmerton J., Delius J.D. Beyond sensation: visual cognition in pigeons. Vision, brain, and behavior in birds 1993, 377-390. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. H.P. Zeigler, H.J. Bischof (Eds.).
44. Emmerton J., Renner J.C. Local rather than global processing of visual arrays in numerosity discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia). Anim Cogn 2009, 12:511-526.
45. Emmerton J., Renner J.C. Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons. Learn Behav 2006, 34:176-192.
46. Farnsworth G.L., Smolinski J.L. Numerical discrimination by wild Northern Mockingbirds. Condor 2006, 108:953-957.
47. Feigenson L., Carey S., Hauser M.D. The representations underlying infants' choice of more: object-files versus analog magnitudes. Psychol Sci 2002, 13:150-156.
48. Ferster C.B., Skinner B.F. Schedules of reinforcement 1957, Appleton Century Crofts, New York.
49. Flay C.D., He X.Z., Wang Q. Influence of male density on the courtship and mating duration of male rice weevils, Sitophilus oryzae. NZ Plant Prot 2009, 62:76-79.
50. Furman T., Rubinsten O. Symbolic and non symbolic numerical representation in adults with and without developmental dyscalculia. Behav Brain Funct 2012, 8:55.
51. Garland A., Low J., Burns K.C. Large quantity discrimination by North Island Robins (Petroica longipes). Anim Cogn 2012, 15(6):1129-1140.
52. Gauthier I., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., Anderson A.W. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:191-197.
53. Gebuis T., Reynvoet B. Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli. Behav Res Meth 2011, 43(4):981-986.
54. Gebuis T., Reynvoet B. The role of visual information in numerosity estimation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(5):e37426.
55. Gilmore C., McCarthy S., Spelke E.S. Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and achievement in the fi{ligature}rst year of formal schooling in mathematics. Cognition 2010, 115:394-406.
56. Gómez-Laplaza L.M., Gerlai R. Activity counts: the effect of swimming activity on quantity discrimination in fish. Front. Psychol 2012, 3:484. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00484.
57. Gómez-Laplaza L.M., Gerlai R. Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber's law. Anim Cogn 2011, 14(1):1-9.
58. Gómez-Laplaza L.M., Gerlai R. Spontaneous discrimination of small quantities: shoaling preferences in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare). Anim Cogn 2011, 14(4):565-574.
59. Gómez-Laplaza L.M., Gerlai R. Quantification abilities in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare): the influence of continuous variables. Anim Cogn 2013, 16(3):373-383.
60. Hager M.C., Helfman G.S. Safety in numbers: shoal size choice by minnows under predatory threat. Behav Ecol 1991, 29:271-276.
61. Halberda J., Mazzocco M., Feigenson L. Individual differences in nonverbal number acuity predict maths achievement. Nature 2008, 455:665-668.
62. Hamilton W.D. Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 1971, 31:295-311.
63. Hanus D., Call J. Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes: the effect of presenting whole sets vs. item-by-item. J Comp Psychol 2007, 121:241-249.
64. Hauser M.D., Carey S., Hauser L.B. Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc R Soc Lond B 2000, 267:829-833.
65. Hauser M.D., Spelke E.S. Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: a case study of mathematics. The cognitive neurosciences 2004, vol. 3. MIT Press, Cambridge.
66. Holloway I.D., Price G.R., Ansari D. Common and segregated neural pathways for the processing of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 2010, 49:1006-1117.
67. Hunt S., Low J., Burns C.K. Adaptive numerical competency in a food-hoarding songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 2008, 10:1098-1103.
68. Irie N., Hasegawa T. Summation by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Behav Sci 2012, 2:50-56.
69. Irie-Sugimoto N., Kobayashi T., Sato T., Hasegawa T. Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Anim Cogn 2009, 12(1):193-199.
70. Jaakkola K., Fellner W., Erb L., Rodriguez M., Guarino E. Understanding of the concept of numerically 'less' by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J Comp Psych 2005, 119:286-303.
71. Jordan K., Brannon E.M. Weber's law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 2006, 9(3):159-172.
72. Jordan K.E., MacLean E.L., Brannon E.M. Monkeys match and tally quantities across senses. Cognition 2008, 108(3):617-625.
73. Krusche P., Uller C., Ursula D. Quantity discrimination in salamanders. J Exp Biol 2010, 213:1822-1828.
74. Landeau L., Terborgh J. Oddity and the confusion effect in predation. Anim Behav 1986, 34:1372-1380.
75. MacPherson K., Roberts W.A. Can dogs count?. Learn Motiv 2013, 44(4):241-251.
76. Mechner F. Probability relations within response sequences under ratio reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 1958, 1:109-122.
77. Moskaleva M., Nieder A. Stable numerosity representations irrespective of magnitude context in macaque prefrontal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2014, 39:866-874.
78. Nieder A., Freedman D.J., Miller E.K. Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 2002, 297:1708-1711.
79. Nieder A., Miller E.K. Coding of cognitive magnitude. Compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron 2003, 37(1):149-157.
80. Normand E., Ban S.D., Boesch C. Forest chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) remember the location of numerous fruit trees. Anim Cogn 2009, 12:797-807.
81. Panteleeva S., Reznikova Z., Vygonyailova O. Quantity judgments in the context of risk/reward decision making in striped field mice: first count, then hunt. Front Psychol 2012, 4:53. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00053.
82. Park J., Brannon E.M. Training the approximate number system improves math proficiency. Psychol Sci 2013, 10.1177/0956797613482944.
83. Pepperberg I.M., Brezinski M.V. Acquisition of a relative class concept by an African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): discrimination based on relative size. J Comp Psych 1991, 105:286-294.
84. Pepperberg I.M. Further evidence for addition and numerical competence by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Anim Cogn 2012, 15:711-717.
85. Perdue B.M., Talbot C.F., Stone A., Beran M.J. Putting the elephant back in the herd: elephant relative quantity judgments match those of other species. Anim Cogn 2012, 15:955-961.
86. Piazza M., Facoetti A., Trussardi A.N., Berteletti I., Conte S., Lucangeli D., Dehaene S., Zorzi M. Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition 2010, 116(1):33-41.
87. Piazza M., Izard V., Pinel P., Dehaene S. Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron 2004, 44(3):547-555.
88. Pica P., Lemer C., Izard V., Exact Dehaene S. Approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 2004, 306:499-503.
89. Piffer L., Agrillo C., Hyde C.D. Small and large number discrimination in guppies. Anim Cogn 2012, 15:215-221.
90. Piffer L., Miletto Petrazzini M.E., Agrillo C. Large number discrimination in newborn fish. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(4):e62466.
91. Pisa P.E., Agrillo C. Quantity discrimination in felines: a preliminary investigation of the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus). J Ethol 2009, 27(2):289-293.
92. Price G.R., Palmer D., Battista C., Ansari D. Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults. Acta Psychol 2012, 140(1):50-57.
93. Revkin S., Piazza M., Izard V., Cohen L., Dehaene S. Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation. Psychol Sci 2008, 19(6):607-614.
94. Rugani R., Fontanari L., Simoni E., Regolin L., Vallortigara G. Arithmetic in newborn chicks. Proc R Soc Lond B 2009, 276:2451-2460.
95. Rugani R., Regolin L., Vallortigara G. Discrimination of small numerosities in young chicks. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 2008, 34(3):388-399.
96. Rugani R., Regolin L., Vallortigara G. Rudimental numerical competence in 5-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus): identification of ordinal position. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 2007, 33:21-31.
97. Scarf D., Hayne H., Colombo M. Pigeons on par with primates in numerical competence. Science 2011, 334:1664.
98. Schlaug G., Jäncke L., Huang Y., Steinmetz H. In vivo evidence of structural brain asymmetry in musicians. Science 1995, 267:699-701.
99. Schmithorst V.J., Holland S.K. The effect of musical training on the neural correlates of math processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans. Neurosci Lett 2004, 354:193-196.
100. Shifferman E.M. It's all in your head: the role of quantity estimation in sperm competition. Proc R Soc Lond B 2012, 279(1730):833-840.
101. Sulkowski G., Hauser M.D. Can rhesus monkeys spontaneously subtract. Cognition 2001, 79:239-262.
102. Suzuki K., Kobayashi T. Numerical competence in rats (Rattus norvegicus): Davis & Bradford (1986) extended. J Comp Psych 2000, 114:73-85.
103. Tomonaga M., Matsuzawa T. Enumeration of briefly presented items by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Anim Learn Behav 2002, 30(2):143-157.
104. Tomonaga M. Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations. Anim Cogn 2008, 11:43-57.
105. Uller C., Jaeger R., Guidry G., Salamanders Martin C. (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in a species of basal vertebrate. Anim Cogn 2003, 6:105-112.
106. Uller C., Lewis J.Horses (Equus caballus) select the greater of two quantities in small numerical contrasts. Anim Cogn 2009, 12:733-738.
107. Vonk J., Beran M.J. Bears count too: quantity estimation and comparison in black bears (Ursus americanus). Anim Behav 2012, 84:231-238.
108. Vonk J. Quantity matching by an orangutan (Pongo abelii). Anim Cogn 2014, 17(2):297-306.
109. Ward C., Smuts B.B. Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Anim Cogn 2007, 10:71-80.
110. Wong B.B.M., Rosenthal G.G. Shoal choice in swordtails when preferences conflict. Ethology 2005, 111(2):179-186.
111. Xu F., Spelke E.S. Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 2000, 74:B1-B11.
112. Yaman S., Kilian A., von Fersen L., Güntürkün O. Evidence for a numerosity category that is based on abstract qualities of few vs. many in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Front Psychol 2012, 3. 10.473.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00473.
113. Zebian S., Ansari D. Differences between literates and illiterates on symbolic but not non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing. Psychon Bull Rev 2012, 19(1):93-100.