Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 981-986

  Gebuis, Titia ^a   Reynvoet, Bert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Non symbolic number; Numerical distance; Numerosity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

COGNITION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 81255129063     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0097-5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ansari, D., & Dhital, B. (2006). Age-related changes in the activation of the intraparietal sulcus during nonsymbolic magnitude processing: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1820-1828.
2. Ansari, D., Garcia, N., Lucas, E., Hamon, K., & Dhital, B. (2005). Neural correlates of symbolic number processing in children and adults. NeuroReport, 16, 1769-1773.
3. Cohen Kadosh, R. (2008). Numerical representation: Abstract or nonabstract? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1160-1168.
4. Cohen Kadosh, R., Brodsky, W., Levin, M., & Henik, A. (2008). Mental representation: What pitch can tell us about the distance effect? Cortex, 44, 470-477.
5. Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (2002). Infants' discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 33-66.
6. Gebuis, T., & Gevers, W. (in press). Numerosities and space: Indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to De hevia and Spelke (2009). Cognition.
7. Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the "number sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457-1465.
8. Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10382-10385.
9. Libertus, M. E., Pruitt, L. B., Woldorff, M. G., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Induced alpha-band oscillations reflect ratio-dependent number discrimination in the infant brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 2398-2406.
10. Libertus, M. E., Woldorff, M. G., & Brannon, E. M. (2007). Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 1.
11. Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Large-number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14, 396-401.
12. McCrink, K., & Wynn, K. (2007). Ratio abstraction by 6-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18, 740-745.
13. Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2002). Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: Is number one of them? Psychological Bulletin, 128, 278-294.
14. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
15. Nieder, A., Freedman, D. J., & Miller, E. K. (2002). Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science, 297, 1708-1711.
16. Nieder, A., & Miller, E. K. (2003). Coding of cognitive magnitude: Compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 37, 149-157.
17. Piazza, M., Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Berteletti, I., Conte, S., Lucangeli, D., et al. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116, 33-41.
18. Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44, 547-555.
19. Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 53, 293-305.
20. Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306, 499-503.
21. Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Rivière, D., & LeBihan, D. (2001). Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. NeuroImage, 14, 1013-1026.
22. Reynvoet, B., De Smedt, B., & van den Bussche, E. (2009). Children's representation of symbolic magnitude: The development of the priming distance effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 480-489.
23. Roggeman, C., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2007). Priming reveals differential coding of symbolic and non-symbolic quantities. Cognition, 105, 380-394.
24. Santens, S., Roggeman, C., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Number processing pathways in human parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 77-88.
25. Sophian, C., & Chu, Y. (2008). How do people apprehend large numerosities? Cognition, 107, 460-478.
26. van Oeffelen, M. P., & Vos, P. G. (1982). A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 163-167.
27. van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., De Moor, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 419-425.
28. Xu, F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1-B11.
29. Xu, F., Spelke, E. S., & Goddard, S. (2005). Number sense in human infants. Developmental Science, 8, 88-101.