In the Loop: A Realist Approach to Structure and Agency in the Practice of Strategy

Organization Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 857-879

  Herepath, Andrea ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

agency; critical realism; morphogenetic morphostatic cycle; strategy as practice; structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905246609     PISSN: 01708406     EISSN: 17413044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0170840613509918     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Adams M.Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity.Sociology. 2006;40:511-528.
2. Archer M. S.Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action.The British Journal of Sociology. 1982;33:455-483.
3. Archer M. S.Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995:.
4. Archer M. S.Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
5. Archer M. S.Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000a:.
6. Archer M. S.For structure: Its reality, properties and powers: A reply to Anthony King.Sociological Review. 2000b;48:464-472.
7. Archer M. S.Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
8. Archer M. S.Making our way in through the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
9. Archer M. S.Conversations about reflexivity. Archer M.S., ed. London: Routledge; 2010a:.
10. Archer M. S.Routine, reflexivity, and realism.Sociological Theory. 2010b;28:272-303.
11. Archer M. S.Donati P.Relational sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences. London and New York: Routledge; 2010c:.
12. Archer M. S.The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012:.
13. Critical realism: Essential readings. Archer M. S.Bhaskar R.Collier A.Lawson T.Norrie A., ed. London: Routledge; 1998:.
14. Balogun J.,Huff A. S.,Johnson P.Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing.Journal of Management Studies. 2003;40:197-224.
15. Bhaskar R.A realist theory of science. Brighton: Harvester; 1978:.
16. Bourdieu P.Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977:.
17. Bourdieu P.The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990:.
18. Bourdieu P.Sociology in question. London: SAGE Publications; 1993:.
19. Bourdieu P.,Wacquant L. J. D.An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992:.
20. Buckley W.Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1967:.
21. Campbell C.Distinguishing the power of agency from agentic power: A note on Weber and the "black box" of personal agency.Sociological Theory. 2009;27:407-418.
22. Chaney P.,Drakeford M.The primacy of ideology: Social policy and the first term of the National Assembly for Wales.Social Policy Review. 2004;16:121-142.
23. Chia R.Strategy-as-practice: Reflections on the research agenda.European Management Review. 2004;1:29-34.
24. Chia R.,Holt R.Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective.Organization Studies. 2006;27:635-655.
25. Clarke G. S.The internal conversation: A personal relations theory perspective.Journal of Critical Realism. 2008;7:57-82.
26. Clemens E. S.,Cook J. M.Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change.Annual Review of Sociology. 1999;25:441-466.
27. Courpasson D.,Clegg S.Dissolving the iron cages? Tocqueville, Michels, bureaucracy and the perpetuation of elite power.Organization. 2006;13:319-343.
28. Danermark B.,Ekström M.,Jakobsen L.,Karlsson J.Explaining society: An introduction to critical realism in the social sciences. London and New York: Routledge; 2002:.
29. Denis J-L.,Dompierre G.,Langley A.,Rouleau L.Escalating indecision: Between reification and strategic ambiguity.Organization Science. 2011;22:225-244.
30. Delivering the NHS Plan: Next steps on investment, next steps on reform. London: Department of Health; 2002:.
31. Drakeford M.Health policy in Wales: Making a difference in conditions of difficulty.Critical Social Policy. 2006;26:543-561.
32. Elder-Vass D.Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action.Sociological Theory. 2007;25:325-346.
33. Emirbayer M.,Mische A.What is agency?.American Journal of Sociology. 1998;103:962-1023.
34. Ezzamel M.,Willmott H.Rethinking strategy: Contemporary perspectives and debates.European Management Review. 2004;1:43-48.
35. Fleetwood S.Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective.Organization. 2005;12:197-222.
36. Fleetwood S.Institutions and social structures.Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2008;38:241-265.
37. Critical realist applications in organisation and management studies. Fleetwood S.Ackroyd S., ed. London: Routledge; 2004:.
38. Friedland R.The endless fields of Pierre Bourdieu.Organization. 2009;16:887-917.
39. Friedland R.,Alford R. R.The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J., ed. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press; 1991:.
40. Fuchs S.Beyond agency.Sociological Theory. 2001;19:24-40.
41. Gherardi S.Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowledge in organizations.Organization. 2000;7:211-223.
42. Giddens A.New rules of sociological method. London: Hutchinson; 1976:.
43. Giddens A.Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan; 1979:.
44. Giddens A.The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1984:.
45. Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. Golsorkhi D.Rouleau L.Seidl D.Vaara E., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:.
46. Gomez M. L.,Bouty I.The emergence of an influential practice: Food for thought.Organization Studies. 2011;32:921-940.
47. Greenhalgh T.,Humphrey C.,Hughes J.,MacFarlane F.,Butler C.,Pawson R.How do you modernize a health service? A realistic evaluation of whole-scale transformation in London.Milbank Quarterly. 2009;87:391-416.
48. Greenwood R.,Díaz A. M.,Li S. X.,Lorente J. C.The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses.Organization Science. 2010;21:521-539.
49. Greer S. L.Territorial politics and health policy: UK health policy in comparative perspective. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2004:.
50. Heidegger M.What is called thinking?. New York: Harper Perennial; 2004 [1954]:.
51. Heidegger M.Being and time. New York: Harper Perennial; 2008 [1927]:.
52. HerepathA. J. (2010). Strategy as practice from macro to micro: A critical realist morphogenetic-morphostatic analysis of evidenced based health and social care policy and strategy development in NHS Wales. PhD Thesis, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University.
53. Trust, assurance and safety - The regulation of health professionals in the 21st century. London: HMSO; 2007:.
54. Hodgson G. M.The evolution of institutional economics: Agency, structure and Darwinism in American institutionalism. London: Routledge; 2004:.
55. Hoffman A. J.,Ventresca M. J.The institutional framing of policy debates: Economic versus the environment.American Behavioural Scientist. 1999;42:1368-1392.
56. Hoon C.Committees as strategic practice: The role of strategic conversation in a public administration.Human Relations. 2007;60:921-952.
57. Horrocks I.Applying the morphogenetic approach.Journal of Critical Realism. 2009;8:35-62.
58. Jarzabkowski P.Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use.Organization Studies. 2004;25:529-560.
59. Jarzabkowski P.Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London: SAGE Publications; 2005:.
60. Jarzabkowski P.Shaping strategy as a structuration process.Academy of Management Journal. 2008;51:621-650.
61. Jarzabkowski P.,Seidl D.The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy.Organization Studies. 2008;29:1391-1426.
62. Jarzabkowski P.,Spee A.P.Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field.International Journal of Management Reviews. 2009;11:69-95.
63. Jarzabkowski P.,Balogun J.,Seidl D.Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective.Human Relations. 2007;60:5-27.
64. Johnson G.,Langley A.,Melin L.,Whittington R.Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
65. Johnson G.,Melin L.,Whittington R.Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view.Journal of Management Studies. 2003;40:3-22.
66. Joseph J.A realist theory of hegemony.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2000;30:179-202.
67. Joseph J.Re-stating hegemonic theory.Journal of Critical Realism. 2003;2:127-137.
68. Joseph J.,Ocasio W.Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General Electric from 1951 to 2001.Strategic Management Journal. 2012;33:633-660.
69. Kaplan S.Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future.Journal of Management Studies. 2011;48:665-695.
70. Kennedy I. Learning From Bristol: The Report of the Public Inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health by Command of Her Majesty; 2001 2001; 2001 2001.
71. Lawson T.Economics and reality. London: Routledge; 1997:.
72. Layder D.Understanding social theory. London: SAGE Publications; 2006:.
73. Luckett T. K.Unsettling humanity: A critique of Archer's.Being Human. Journal of Critical Realism. 2008;7:297-313.
74. Lukes S.Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan; 1974:.
75. Mantere S.Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity.Strategic Organization. 2005;3:157-184.
76. Mantere S.Role expectations and middle managers strategic agency.Journal of Management Studies. 2008;45:294-316.
77. McCabe D.Strategy-as-power: Ambiguity, contradiction and the exercise of power in a UK building society.Organization. 2010;17:151-175.
78. Michels RobertPolitical parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Hearst's International Library; 1915:.
79. Miller K. D.,Tsang E. W. K.Testing management theories: Critical realist philosophy and research methods.Strategic Management Journal. 2011;32:139-158.
80. Mouzelis N. P.Modern and postmodern social theorizing: Bridging the divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
81. Mutch A.Dominant logic, culture and ideology.Research in the Sociology of Organizations. 2009;27:145-170.
82. Nadkarni S.,Barr S.Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view.Strategic Management Journal. 2008;29:1395-1427.
83. Nicolini D.Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections.Organization Studies. 2009;30:1391-1418.
84. Orlikowski W. J.The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations.Organization Science. 1992;3:398-427.
85. Orlikowski W. J.Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. Golsorkhi D.Rouleau L.Seidl D.Vaara E., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:.
86. Pawson R.,Tilley N.Realistic evaluation. London: SAGE Publications; 1997:.
87. Porpora D. V.Critical realism: Essential readings. Archer M. S.Bhaskar R.Collier A.Lawson T.Norrie A., ed. London: Routledge; 1998:.
88. Porpora D. V.,Shumar W.Conversations about reflexivity. Archer M. S., ed. London: Routledge; 2010:.
89. Potter G.Power and knowledge: A dialectical contradiction.Journal of Critical Realism. 2010;9:133-154.
90. Quinn M.Evidence based or people based policy making? A view from Wales.Public Policy and Administration. 2002;17:29-42.
91. Reckwitz A.Toward a theory of social practices: A development in cultural theorizing.European Journal of Social Theory. 2002;5:243-263.
92. Reed M.In praise of duality and dualism: Rethinking agency and structure in organisational analysis.Organization Studies. 1997;18:21-42.
93. Reed M.Reflections on the realist turn in organization and management studies.Journal of Management Studies. 2005;42:1621-1644.
94. Sandberg J.,Dall'Alba G.Returning to practice anew: A life-world perspective.Organization Studies. 2009;30:1349-1368.
95. Santos F. M.,Eisenhardt K. M.Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields.Academy of Management Journal. 2009;52:643-671.
96. Sayer A.Realism and social science. London: SAGE Publications; 2000:.
97. Schatzki T. R.The practice turn in contemporary theory. Schatzki T. R.Knorr Cetina K.Von Savigny E., ed. London: Routledge; 2001:.
98. Schatzki T. R.Peripheral vision: The sites of organization.Organization Studies. 2005;26:465-484.
99. Shotter J.Understanding process from within: An argument for 'withness'-thinking.Organization Studies. 2006;27:585-604.
100. Smith C.What is a person?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2010:.
101. Stones R.Refusing the realism-structuration divide.European Journal of Social Theory. 2001;4:177-197.
102. Stones R.Structuration theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005:.
103. Vaara E.,Whittington R.Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously.Academy of Management Annuals. 2012;6:285-336.
104. Van de,Ven A. H.,Johnson P. E.Knowledge for theory and practice.Academy of Management Review. 2006;31:802-821.
105. Response to the Kennedy Report. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government; 2002:.
106. Wales: Forward not back. The Welsh Labour Party General Election Manifesto. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party; 2005:.
107. Whittington R.Completing the practice turn in strategy research.Organization Studies. 2006a;27:613-634.
108. Whittington R.Learning more from failure: Practice and process.Organization Studies. 2006b;27:1903-1906.
109. Whittington R.Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. Golsorkhi D.Rouleau L.Seidl D.Vaara E., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:.
110. Zundel M.,Kokkalis P.Theorizing as engaged practice.Organization Studies. 2010;31:1209-1227.