Structure, agency and the internal conversation

Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-372

  Archer, Margaret S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929665873     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139087315     Document Type: Book

References (115)

1. Margaret S. Archer, Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge University Press, 1995, ch. 4.
2. Nicos Mouzelis, ‘The Subjectivist-Objectivist Divide: Against Transcendence’, Sociology, 34: 4, 2000.
3. Roy Bhaskar's most developed diagram of his ‘Transformational Model of Social Action’, Reclaiming Reality, Verso, London, 1989, p. 94.
4. ‘Morphogenetic Approach’, Realist Social Theory, p. 157.
5. Roy Bhaskar, The Possibility of Naturalism, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, 1989, p. 26.
6. Margaret S. Archer, Culture and Agency, Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 145f.
7. Martin Hollis and Steve Smith, ‘Two Stories about Structure and Agency’, Review of International Studies, 20, 1994, p. 250.
8. Rom Harré, Personal Being, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1983, p. 20.
9. Daniel C. Dennett, Consciousness Explained, Penguin, London, 1993.
10. Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, 1977 and The Logic of Practice, Polity Press, Oxford, 1990.
11. Anthony Giddens, Central Problems in Social Theory, Macmillan, London, 1979 and The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Oxford, 1990.
12. Andrew Collier, Critical Realism, Verso, London, 1994, pp. 76-85 on the ‘epistemic fallacy’.
13. Gilbert Ryle, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London, 1949, pp. 13-14.
14. John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Book II, ch.2.
15. David M. Armstrong, A Materialist Theory of the Mind, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1968.
16. William Lyons, The Disappearance of Introspection, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986, p. 52.
17. The First-Person Perspective and Other Essays, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
18. Self-Knowledge and Self-Identity, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1963.
19. Quassim Cassam, ‘Introduction’, to his (ed.), Self-Knowledge, Oxford University Press, 1994.
20. D. C. Dennett, Consciousness Explained, Penguin, London, 1993, p. 81.
21. Colin McGinn, Mental Content, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1989, pp. 3If.
22. Hilary Putnam, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”‘, repr. in Philosophical Papers, ii. Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge, 1975, pp. 227.
23. Donald Davidson, ‘Knowing One's Own Mind’, The Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 60, 1987, pp. 441-58
24. John R. Searle, The Rediscovery of the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1995, ch. 7.
25. Margaret S. Archer, ‘Homo Economics, Homo Sociologicus and Homo Sentiens’, in Margaret S. Archer and Jonathan Q. Tritter (eds.), Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonization, Routledge, London, 2000.
26. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge University Press, 2000, ch.7.
27. Harry G. Frankfurt, The Importance of What We Care About, Cambridge University Press, 1988, ch. 7.
28. Steven Stich, From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1983.
29. Gerald E. Myers, ‘Introspection and Self-Knowledge’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 23:2, April 1986, p. 206.
30. Charles Taylor, ‘Self-Interpreting Animals’, in his Human Agency and Language, Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 65f.
31. Karl R. Popper, ‘On the Theory of the Objective Mind’, in his Objective Knowledge, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972.
32. Margaret S. Archer, Culture and Agency, Cambridge University Press, 1988, ch. 5.
33. Karl Popper, Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography, Routledge, London, 1992.
34. Margaret S. Archer, Culture and Agency, Cambridge University Press, 1988, ch. 5.
35. Harry G. Frankfurt, ‘Identification and Wholeheartedness’, in his The Importance of What We Care About, pp. 161-2.
36. Gordon Gallup Jr, ‘Self-Recognition in Primates’, American Psychologist, 1977, 32, pp. 329-38.
37. Lynne Rudder Baker, ‘The First-Person Perspective: A Test for Naturalism’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 35: 4, 1998, p. 331.
38. Rom Harre, Personal Being, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1983, p. 26.
39. Peter Geach, Mental Acts, Humanities Press, New York, 1957, p. 118.
40. Joseph Agassi, Science in Flux: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27 (R. S. Cohen and M. Wartofsky eds.), 1975, p. 120.
41. William Alston, ‘Varieties of Privileged Access’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 8:3, 1971, pp. 225f.
42. Sydney Shoemaker, ‘How is Self-Knowledge Possible?’, in his Self-Knowledge and Self-Identity, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1963.
43. Thomas Nagel, ‘What Is it Like to be a Bat?’, reprinted in David M. Rosenthal, The Nature of Mind, Oxford University Press, 1991.
44. Donald Davidson, ‘First-Person Authority’, Dialectics 38: 2-3, 1984, p. 105.
45. Martin Hollis and Steve Smith, ‘Two Stories about Structure and Agency’, Review of International Studies, 20, 1994.
46. Immanuel Kant, What Real Progress has Metaphysics Made in Germany since the Time of Leibniz and Wolff?, Abaris Books, New York, 1804/1983, p. 73.
47. Auguste Comte, Cours de Philosophic Positive, Hermann, Paris, 1975 (vol. 1), pp. 34-8.
48. J. S. Mill, Auguste Comte and Positivism [1882], University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1973, p. 64.
49. William Lyons, The Disappearance of Introspection, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986, p. 15.
50. J. S. Mill, Auguste Comte and Positivism.
51. William James, The Principles of Psychology (vol. l), Macmillan, London, 1890, pp. 188-9.
52. Edward C. Moore, American Pragmatism, Columbia University Press, New York, 1966.
53. Morton White, Pragmatism and the American Mind, Oxford University Press, New York, 1973.
54. J. David Lewis and Richard L. Smith, American Sociology and Pragmatism, University of Chicago Press, 1980.
55. William James, ‘Does “Consciousness” Exist?’, in his Essays in Radical Empiricism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1976, p. 4.
56. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition (vol. 2), 1867-71, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, p. 172.
57. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 7 (ed. Arthur W. Burks), Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1958, p. 420.
58. Vincent M. Colapietro, Peirce's Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1989, p. 117.
59. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 4 (ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss), 1933, p. 6.
60. William James, Essays on Faith and Morals (ed. R. Barton Perry), New American Library, New York, 1974, pp. 30-1.
61. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 5 (ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss), pp. 134-5, p. 5.
62. Richard J. Bernstein, Praxis and Action, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1971, pp. 198f.
63. Manley Thompson, The Pragmatic Philosophy of C. S. Peirce, University of Chicago Press, 1953.
64. Patricia Muoio, ‘Peirce on the Person’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 1984, 20, no. 2: 169-8.
65. C. F. Delaney, ‘Peirce's Account of Mental Activity’, Synthese, 1979, 41, pp. 25-36.
66. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. 1, 1857-66, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1982, p. 498.
67. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 5, p. 21.
68. William H. Davis, Peirce's Epistemology, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1972, p. 12.
69. The Philosophical Works of Descartes, Cambridge University Press, 1972.
70. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 4, 1933, p. 6.
71. Margaret S. Archer, Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge University Press, 1995, ch. 3.
72. Norbert Wiley, The Semiotk Self, Polity Press, Oxford, 1994, chs. 2 and 3.
73. Margaret S. Archer, Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, 1998, Cambridge University Press, ch. 1.
74. G. H. Mead, ‘1927 Class Lectures in Social Psychology’, in D. L. Miller (ed.), The Individual and the Social Self, University of Chicago Press, 1982, p. 155.
75. G. H. Mead, Mind, Self and Society [1934] University of Chicago Press, 1974, p. 138.
76. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge University Press, 2000, ch. 4.
77. Hans Joas, G.H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-Examination of his Thought, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1985, pp. 162-6.
78. G. H. Mead, ‘The Social Self [1913], in Andrew J. Reck (ed.), Selected Writings: George Herbert Mead, Bobbs Merrill, NY, 1964, p. 146.
79. John D. Baldwin, George Herbert Mead, Sage, London, 1986, p. 107.
80. G. H. Mead, ‘What Social Objects must Psychology Presuppose?’ [1910], in Andrew R. Reck, Selected Writings, p. 111.
81. G. H. Mead, ‘The Genesis of the Self and Social Control’ (1924-5), in Andrew R. Reck, Selected Writings, p. 288.
82. G. H. Mead, ‘1914 Class Lectures in Social Psychology’, in D. L. Miller, The Individual and the Social Self, p. 55.
83. David L. Miller, George Herbert Mead; Self, Language, and the World, University of Texas Press, Austin, 1973, p. 158.
84. Thomas Nagel, ‘What Is it Like to be a Bat?’, reprinted in David M. Rosenthal, The Nature of Mind, Oxford University Press, 1991.
85. Peter Hamilton (ed.), George Herbert Mead: Critical Assessments, vol. 4, Routledge, London, 1992, p. 115.
86. Randall Collins, ‘Towards a Neo-Meadian Sociology of Mind’, in Peter Hamilton (ed.), George Herbert Mead: Critical Assessments, p. 288.
87. Steven Lukes, Power: A Radical View, Macmillan, London, 1974.
88. J. Habermas, ‘Individuation through Socialisation: On George Herbert Mead's Theory of Subjectivity’, in his Postmetaphysical Thinking, Polity Press, Oxford, 1992, p. 188.
89. The Social Dynamics of George H. Mead, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1973, p. 17.
90. J. David Lewis, ‘A Social Behaviourist Interpretation of the Median “I” ‘, American Journal of Sociology, 1979, 85: 2, p. 277.
91. Harold N. Lee, ‘Mead's Doctrine of the Past’, Tulane Studies in Philosophy, 12, 1963, pp. 52-75, which shows how ‘the world which is there’ is for Mead, the world we take for granted epistemically.
92. G. H. Mead, The Philosophy of the Present (ed. Arthur E. Murphy), Open Court, Chicago, 1932, p. 1.
93. Herbert Blumer, ‘Mead and Blumer: The Convergent Methodological Perspectives of Social Behaviourism and Symbolic Interactions’, American Sociological Review, 1980: 45, pp. 409-19.
94. B. N. Meltzer, J. W. Petras and L. T. Reynolds, Symbolic Interactionism: Genesis, Varieties and Criticism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1975.
95. J. David Lewis, ‘The Classical American Pragmatists as Forerunners to Symbolic Interactionism’, The Sociological Quarterly, 17, Summer, 1976, pp. 347-59.
96. Sydney Shoemaker, ‘On Knowing One's Own Mind’, in his The First Person Perspective and Other Essays, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
97. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 230-41.
98. Rom Harre and Grant Gillett, The Discursive Mind, Sage, London and Beverly Hills, 1994.
99. Donald Davidson, ‘First-Person Authority’, Dialectica, 38: 2-3, 1984.
100. Margaret S. Archer, Realist Social Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1995, p. 2.
101. Margaret S. Archer, Social Origins of Educational Systems, Sage, London and Beverly Hills, 1979.
102. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human, Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 232-41.
103. Charles Taylor, ‘Self-Interpreting Animals’, in his Human Agency and Language, esp. pp. 65-8.
104. Charles Taylor, ‘Consciousness’, in Paul F. Secord (ed.), Explaining Human Behaviour: Human Action and Social Structure., Sage, London, 1982, p. 50.
105. Charles Taylor, ‘Self-Interpreting Animals’, in his Human Agency and Language, Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 65f.
106. Elizabeth Bott, Family and Social Network, Tavistock, London [1957], 1971, pp. 8-9.
107. Douglas V. Porpora, Landscapes of the Soul, Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 6.
108. William Ernest Henley, ‘Echoes for Invictors’, The Cornhill Magazine, 1875.
109. Margaret S. Archer and Jonathan Tritter (eds.), Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonization, Routledge, London, 2000.
110. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge University Press, 2000, ch. 6.
111. Roy Bhaskar, The Possibility of Naturalism, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, 1989, p. 26.
112. Colin Campbell, The Myth of Social Action, Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 28.
113. Margaret S. Archer, Culture and Agency, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
114. David Lockwood, ‘Social Integration and System Integration’, in G. K. Zollschan and W. Hirsch (eds.), Explorations in Social Change, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1964.
115. Family and Kinship in East London, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1962.