On Funtowicz and Ravetz's "Decision Stake-System Uncertainties" Structure and Recently Developed Risk Perspectives

Risk Analysis

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 270-280

  Aven, Terje ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Consequences; Funtowicz and Ravetz; Risk perspectives; Uncertainties

Indexed keywords

APPLIED SCIENCE; CONSEQUENCES; FUNTOWICZ AND RAVETZ; POST-NORMAL SCIENCE; RISK LITERATURE; RISK PERSPECTIVE; TWO-DIMENSION; UNCERTAINTIES; VALUE DIMENSIONS;

PHYSIOLOGY; RISK ANALYSIS;

SAFETY ENGINEERING;

CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 84873129842     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01857.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Thompson KM, Deisler PH, Jr., Schwing RC. Interdisciplinary vision: The first 25 years of the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA), 1980-2005. Risk Analysis, 2005; 25:1333-1386.
2. Aven T, Renn O. On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research, 2009; 12:1-11.
3. Aven T. On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010; 95:623-631.
4. Aven T. A risk concept applicable for both probabilistic and non-probabilistic perspectives. Safety Science, 2011; 49:1080-1086.
5. Rosa EA. Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 1998; 1:15-44.
6. Rosa EA. The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Metatheoretical foundation and policy implications. Pp. 47-79 in Pidegeon N, Kaspersen RE, Slovic P (eds). The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003.
7. IRGC, International Risk Governance Council. White Paper on Risk Governance. Towards an Integrative Approach. Author: O. Renn with Annexes by P. Graham. Geneva: International Risk Governance Council, 2005.
8. Aven T, Renn O, Rosa E. The ontological status of the concept of risk. Safety Science, 2011; 49:1074-1079.
9. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR. Three types of risk assessment. Pp. 217-231 in Whipple C, Covello VT (eds). Risk Analysis in the Private Sector. New York : Plenum Press, 1985.
10. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR. The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a postnormal science. Ecological Economics, 1994; 10:197-207.
11. Kaplan S, Garrick BJ. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1981; 1:11-27.
12. Aven T. A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis and management covering both safety and security. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007; 92:745-754.
13. Dubois D. Representation, propagation and decision issues in risk analysis under incomplete probabilistic information. Risk Analysis, 2010; 30:361-368.
14. Aven T, Zio E. Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision-making. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011; 96:64-74.
15. Renn O. Risk Governance. Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London : Earthscan, 2008.
16. Lindley DV. The philosophy of statistics. Statistician, 2000; 49(3):293-337.
17. Aven T, Renn O. Risk Management and Risk Governance. Berlin : Springer Verlag, 2010.
18. Renn O, Klinke A. A new approach to risk evaluation and management: Risk-based precaution-based and discourse-based strategies. Risk Analysis, 2002; 22(6):1071-1094.
19. Kristensen V, Aven T, Ford D. A new perspective on Renn & Klinke's approach to risk evaluation and risk management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006; 91:421-432.
20. Apostolakis GE. The concept of probability in safety assessment of technological systems. Science, 1990; 250:1359-1364.
21. Winkler RL. Uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996; 54(2-3):127-132.
22. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948; 27:379-423, 623-656.
23. Pate-Cornell ME. Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996; 54(2-3):95-111.
24. Thompson KM, Graham JD. Going beyond the single number: Using probabilistic risk assessment to improve risk management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 1996; 2(4):1008-1034.
25. Flage R, Aven T. Expressing and communicating uncertainty in relation to quantitative risk analysis (QRA). Reliability & Risk Analysis: Theory & Applications, 2009; 2(13):9-18.
26. Aven T. On different types of uncertainties in the context of the precautionary principle. Risk Analysis, 2011; 31(10):1515-1525. With discussion 1538-1542.
27. International Organization for Standardization. Risk Management-Principles and Guidelines, ISO 31000, 2009.
28. International Organization for Standardization. Risk Management-Vocabulary. Guide 73, 2009.
29. Aven T. On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011; 96(7):719-726.
30. Singpurwalla N. Reliability and Risk. A Bayesian Perspective. New York : Wiley, 2006.
31. De Rocquigny E, Devictor N, Tarantola S (eds). Uncertainty in Industrial Practice. A Guide to Quantitative Uncertainty Management. NJ : Wiley, 2008.
32. Ferson S, Ginzburg LR. Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996; 54:133-144.
33. Aven T. Risk Analysis. Chichester : Wiley, 2008.