Myocardial CT perfusion imaging and SPECT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A head-to-head comparison from the CORE320 multicenter diagnostic performance study

Radiology

Volumn 272, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 407-416

  George, Richard T ^a   Mehra, Vishal C ^a,e   Chen, Marcus Y ^e   Kitagawa, Kakuya ^h   Arbab Zadeh, Armin ^a   Miller, Julie M ^a   Matheson, Matthew B ^b   Vavere, Andrea L ^a   Kofoed, Klaus F ^j   Rochitte, Carlos E ^d   Dewey, Marc ^m   Yaw, Tan S ^k   Niinuma, Hiroyuki ^f,g   Brenner, Winfried ^l   Cox, Christopher ^b   Clouse, Melvin E ⁱ   Lima, João A C ^a   Di Carli, Marcelo ^c,l  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^e NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g ST LUKE'S INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^h MIE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

ⁱ HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^k DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY   (Singapore)

^l CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^m Department of Nuclear Medicine Charité University Medicine Berlin ^*

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; IOPAMIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CAMERA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84904994736     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140806     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(3):174-182.
2. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5(3):333-340.
3. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(12):1072-1084.
4. Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, et al. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61(10):1099-1107.
5. Rochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY, et al. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J 2014;35(17):1120-1130.
6. San Román JA, Vilacosta I, Castillo JA, et al. Selection of the optimal stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Heart 1998;80(4):370-376. (Pubitemid 28470770)
7. Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 2012;379(9814):453-460.
8. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359(22):2324-2336.
9. Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Baudhuin T, Camici PG. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1994;330(25):1782-1788.
10. Di Carli M, Czernin J, Hoh CK, et al. Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1995;91(7):1944-1951.
11. Gottsauner-Wolf M, Sochor H, Moertl D, Gwechenberger M, Stockenhuber F, Probst P. Assessing coronary stenosis: quantitative coronary angiography versus visual estimation from cine-film or pharmacological stress perfusion images. Eur Heart J 1996;17(8):1167-1174. (Pubitemid 26289949)
12. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Cerci RJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-MDCT: the CT angiography and perfusion methods of the CORE320 multicenter multinational diagnostic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(4):829-837.
13. Vavere AL, Simon GG, George RT, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 row detector computed tomography: design and implementation of the CORE320 multicenter, multinational diagnostic study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(6):370-381.
14. Cerci RJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, George RT, et al. Aligning coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion territories: an algorithm for the CORE320 multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5(5):587-595.
15. Henzlova MJ, Cerqueira MD, Hansen CL, Taillefer R, Yao SS. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures: stress protocols and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16(2):331.
16. Miller JM, Dewey M, Vavere AL, et al. Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64. Eur Radiol 2009;19(4):816-828.
17. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361(9355):374-379. (Pubitemid 36164969)
18. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, et al. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5(11):1097-1111.
19. Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, et al. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14(4):521-528. (Pubitemid 47163572)
20. Svane B, Bone D, Holmgren A. Coronary angiography and thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography in multiple vessel coronary artery disease. Acta Radiol 1990;31(4):325-332. (Pubitemid 20330562)
21. Dilsizian V. SPECT and PET myocardial perfusion imaging: tracers and techniques. In: Dilsizian V, Narula J, eds. Atlas of nuclear cardiology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2013; 55-94.
22. Ichihara T, George RT, Silva C, Lima JA, Lardo AC. Quantitative analysis of first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion multidetector CT using a Patlak plot method and extraction fraction correction during adenosine stress. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2011;58(1):133-138.
23. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42(12):815-822. (Pubitemid 350126563)
24. Böttcher M, Czernin J, Sun K, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Effect of beta 1 adrenergic receptor blockade on myocardial blood flow and vasodilatory capacity. J Nucl Med 1997;38(3):442-446. (Pubitemid 27376900)
25. Sharir T, Rabinowitz B, Livschitz S, et al. Underestimation of extent and severity of coronary artery disease by dipyridamole stress thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in patients taking antianginal drugs. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31(7):1540-1546. (Pubitemid 28273296)
26. Venero CV, Heller GV, Bateman TM, et al. A multicenter evaluation of a new post-processing method with depth-dependent collimator resolution applied to full-time and half-time acquisitions without and with simultaneously acquired attenuation correction. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16(5):714-725.
27. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32(1):57-62. (Pubitemid 28351042)
28. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97(6):535-543. (Pubitemid 28090682)
29. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2011;260(3):689-698.
30. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010;254(2):410-419.
31. Rief M, Zimmermann E, Stenzel F, et al. Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62(16):1476-1485.
32. Kitagawa K, George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Lima JA, Lardo AC. Characterization and correction of beam-hardening artifacts during dynamic volume CT assessment of myocardial perfusion. Radiology 2010;256(1):111-118.