Quantitative analysis of triple-mutant genetic interactions

Nature Protocols

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1867-1881

  Braberg, Hannes ^a,b   Alexander, Richard ^a,b   Shales, Michael ^a,b   Xu, Jiewei ^a,b   Franks Skiba, Kathleen E ^a,b   Wu, Qiuqin ^c   Haber, James E ^c   Krogan, Nevan J ^a,b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d GLADSTONE INSTITUTES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; PROTEIN ASF1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DELETION MUTANT; DIPLOIDY; EPISTASIS; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS MUTANT; GENE DELETION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC STRAIN; HAPLOIDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ROBOTICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SPOROGENESIS; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; TRIPLE MUTANT ANALYSIS; YEAST; GENE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES;

GENE DELETION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 84904964372     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2014.127     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Tong, A.H. et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364-2368 (2001
2. Tong, A.H. et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303, 808-813 (2004
3. Collins, S.R., Roguev, A. & Krogan, N.J. Quantitative genetic interaction mapping using the E-MAP approach. Methods Enzymol. 470, 205-231 (2010
4. Schuldiner, M. et al. Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123, 507-519 (2005
5. Butland, G. et al. eSGA: E. coli. synthetic genetic array analysis. Nat. Methods 5, 789-795 (2008
6. Typas, A. et al. High-Throughput, quantitative analyses of genetic interactions in E. coli. Nat. Methods 5, 781-787 (2008
7. Bassik, M.C. et al. A systematic mammalian genetic interaction map reveals pathways underlying ricin susceptibility. Cell 152, 909-922 (2013
8. Roguev, A. et al. Quantitative genetic-interaction mapping in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 10, 432-437 (2013
9. Roguev, A., Wiren, M., Weissman, J.S. & Krogan, N.J. High-Throughput genetic interaction mapping in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat. Methods 4, 861-866 (2007
10. Ryan, C.J. et al. Hierarchical modularity and the evolution of genetic interactomes across species. Mol. Cell 46, 691-704 (2012
11. Pan, X. et al. A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome. Mol. Cell 16, 487-496 (2004
12. Pan, X. et al. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124, 1069-1081 (2006
13. Aguilar, P.S. et al. A plasma-membrane E-MAP reveals links of the eisosome with sphingolipid metabolism and endosomal trafficking. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 901-908 (2010
14. Collins, S.R. et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446, 806-810 (2007
15. Fiedler, D. et al. Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network. Cell 136, 952-963 (2009
16. Wilmes, G.M. et al. A genetic interaction map of RNA-processing factors reveals links between Sem1/Dss1-containing complexes and mRNA export and splicing. Mol. Cell 32, 735-746 (2008
17. Schuldiner, M., Collins, S.R., Weissman, J.S. & Krogan, N.J. Quantitative genetic analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using epistatic miniarray profiles (E-MAPs) and its application to chromatin functions. Methods 40, 344-352 (2006
18. Braberg, H et al. From structure to systems: High-resolution, quantitative genetic analysis of RNA polymerase II. Cell 154, 775-788 (2013
19. Surma, M.A. et al. A lipid E-MAP identifies Ubx2 as a critical regulator of lipid saturation and lipid bilayer stress. Mol. Cell 51, 519-530 (2013
20. Beltrao, P., Cagney, G. & Krogan, N.J. Quantitative genetic interactions reveal biological modularity. Cell 141, 739-745 (2010
21. Donaldson, A.D. The yeast mitotic cyclin Clb2 cannot substitute for S-phase cyclins in replication origin firing. EMBO Rep. 1, 507-512 (2000
22. Haber, J.E. et al. Systematic triple-mutant analysis uncovers functional connectivity between pathways involved in chromosome regulation. Cell Rep. 3, 2168-2178 (2013
23. Mai, B. & Breeden, L. CLN1 and its repression by Xbp1 are important for efficient sporulation in budding yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 478-487 (2000
24. Segal, M., Clarke, D.J. & Reed, S.I. Clb5-Associated kinase activity is required early in the spindle pathway for correct preanaphase nuclear positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 143, 135-145 (1998
25. Hsu, W.S. et al. S-phase cyclin-dependent kinases promote sister chromatid cohesion in budding yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 31, 2470-2483 (2011
26. Ben-Aroya, S., Koren, A., Liefshitz, B., Steinlauf, R. & Kupiec, M. ELG1, a yeast gene required for genome stability, forms a complex related to replication factor C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9906-9911 (2003
27. Green, C.M., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P. & Lowndes, N.F. A novel Rad24 checkpoint protein complex closely related to replication factor C. Curr. Biology 10, 39-42 (2000
28. Hanna, J.S., Kroll, E.S., Lundblad, V. & Spencer, F.A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 3144-3158 (2001
29. Mayer, M.L., Gygi, S.P., Aebersold, R. & Hieter, P. Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): An alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 7, 959-970 (2001
30. Naiki, T., Kondo, T., Nakada, D., Matsumoto, K. & Sugimoto, K. Chl12 (Ctf18) forms a novel replication factor C-related complex and functions redundantly with Rad24 in the DNA replication checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 5838-5845 (2001
31. Roelofs, J. et al. Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly. Nature 459, 861-865 (2009
32. De Koning, L., Corpet, A., Haber, J.E. & Almouzni, G. Histone chaperones: An escort network regulating histone traffic. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 997-1007 (2007
33. Enomoto, S. & Berman, J. Chromatin assembly factor I contributes to the maintenance, but not the re-establishment, of silencing at the yeast silent mating loci. Genes Dev. 12, 219-232 (1998
34. Ramey, C.J. et al. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint in yeast lacking the histone chaperone anti-silencing function 1. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 10313-10327 (2004
35. Sugawara, N., Wang, X. & Haber, J.E. In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell 12, 209-219 (2003
36. Driscoll, R., Hudson, A & Jackson, S.P. Yeast Rtt109 promotes genome stability by acetylating histone H3 on lysine 56. Science 315, 649-652 (2007
37. Han, J., Zhou, H., Li, Z., Xu, R.M. & Zhang, Z. Acetylation of lysine 56 of histone H3 catalyzed by RTT109 and regulated by ASF1 is required for replisome integrity. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 28587-28596 (2007
38. Blanco, M.G., Matos, J., Rass, U., Ip, S.C. & West, S.C. Functional overlap between the structure-specific nucleases Yen1 and Mus81-Mms4 for DNA-damage repair in S. cerevisiae. DNA Repair 9, 394-402 (2010
39. Ho, C.K., Mazon, G., Lam, A.F. & Symington, L.S. Mus81 and Yen1 promote reciprocal exchange during mitotic recombination to maintain genome integrity in budding yeast. Mol. Cell 40, 988-1000 (2010
40. Tay, Y.D. & Wu, L. Overlapping roles for Yen1 and Mus81 in cellular Holliday junction processing. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11427-11432 (2010
41. Zhao, X., Muller, E.G. & Rothstein, R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2, 329-340 (1998
42. Koranda, M., Schleiffer, A., Endler, L. & Ammerer, G. Forkhead-like transcription factors recruit Ndd1 to the chromatin of G2/M-specific promoters. Nature 406, 94-98 (2000
43. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012
44. Boulton, S.J. & Jackson, S.P. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: Roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 4639-4648 (1996
45. Lee, S.E., Paques, F., Sylvan, J. & Haber, J.E. Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths. Curr. Biol. 9, 767-770 (1999
46. Moore, J.K. & Haber, J.E. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 2164-2173 (1996
47. Ma, J.L., Kim, E.M., Haber, J.E. & Lee, S.E. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 8820-8828 (2003
48. Laufer, C., Fischer, B., Billmann, M., Huber, W. & Boutros, M. Mapping genetic interactions in human cancer cells with RNAi and multiparametric phenotyping. Nat. Methods 10, 427-431 (2013
49. Deriano, L. & Roth, D.B. Modernizing the nonhomologous end-joining repertoire: Alternative and classical NHEJ share the stage. Annu. Rev. Genet. 47, 433-455 (2013
50. Collins, S.R., Schuldiner, M., Krogan, N.J. & Weissman, J.S. A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol. 7, R63 (2006