Big desire to share big health data: A shift in consumer attitudes toward personal health information

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-14-01, Issue , 2014, Pages 51-58

  Pickard, K Thomas ^a   Swan, Melanie ^b  

^a StartCodon   (United States)

^b MS Futures Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER ATTITUDES; HEALTH INFORMATIONS; HEALTH SYSTEMS; HEALTHCARE SERVICES; PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATIONS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINES; RESEARCH PURPOSE; WILLINGNESS TO SHARE;

BIG DATA;

EID: 84904886661     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Acquisti, A.; John, L.; and Loewenstein, G. 2010. What is Privacy Worth? 2010 Future of Privacy Forum's Best "Privacy Papers for Policy Makers" Competition.
2. Agarwal, R.; Anderson, C. 2008. The complexity of consumer willingness to disclose personal information: Unraveling health information privacy concerns. eHealth Initiative's 5th Annual Conference; Washington, DC.
3. Balaram, S.; Dunn, T.; Harris, M.; Kohn, J.; Le, H.; Lee, C.; Lieberman, O.; Lin, T., and Sachs, A. 2013. Studies on Understanding Individual Willingness to Disclose Genetic Information to Public and Private Stakeholders. Thesis. University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
4. Barnes, S. 2006. A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday. vol. 11, no. 9.
5. Brady, D. 2013. Privacy Paradox: Americans Happy to Share Personal Data With Big Business. Businessweek June 25, 2013.
6. California Healthcare Foundation. 2010. Survey. http://www.chcf.org/~/ media/MEDIA%20LIBRARY%20Files/PDF/C/ PDF%20ConsumersHealthInfoTechnologyNationalSurvey. pdf
7. Cancer Commons. 2014. http://www.cancercommons.org
8. CMS. 2013. Additional Information Regarding EP Clinical Quality Measures for 2014 EHR Incentive Programs. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/ Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/EP-MeasuresTable-Posting-CQMs.pdf
9. CMS. 2014. EHR incentives. http://www.cms.gov/EHRIncentivePrograms
10. eMerge Network. 2014. http://www.genome.gov/27540473
11. FDA. 2013. Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations. 23andMe, Inc. November 22, 2013. http://www.fda.gov/iceci/ enforcementactions/warningletters/2013/ucm376296.htm
12. Genome Standards Consortium. 2014. http://gensc.org
13. Hilgartner, S.; Brandt-Rauf, S.I. 1994. Data Access, Ownership, and Control Toward Empirical Studies of Access Practices. Science Communication 15.4: 355-372.
14. HL7 Standards Committee. 2014. Patient Generated Health Data. http://www.h17.org/implement/standards/product-brief.cfm?product-id=316
15. International Cancer Genome Consortium. 2014. http://icgc.org
16. Gymrek, M.; McGuire, A.L.; Golan, D.; Halperin, E.; Erlich, Y. 2013. Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference. Science. vol. 339 no. 6117 pp. 321-324. doi: 10.1126/science.1229566
17. Horowitz, B.T. 2013. Cisco Says 74 Percent of Consumers Open to Telehealth Sessions. eWeek. http://www.eweek.com/networking/cisco-says-74- percent-of-consumers-open-to-telehealth-sessions/
18. InfoSys. 2013. Digital Consumer Study. http://www.infosys.com/digital- consumer-study
19. Juengst, E.T.; Settersten, R.A. Jr; Fishman, J.R.; McGowan, M.L. 2012. After the revolution? Ethical and social challenges in 'personalized genomic medicine'. Per Med. Jun 1;9(4):429-439.
20. Kaye, J.; Curren, L.; Anderson, N.; Edwards, K.; Fullerton, S.; Kanellopoulou, N.; Lund, D.; MacArthur, D.G.; Mascalzoni, D.; Shepherd, J.; Taylor, P.L.; Terry, S.F.; and Winter, S.F. 2012. From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research Nature Reviews Genetics. doi:10.1038/nrg3218
21. Kent, A., ed. 1999. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
22. Kido, T.; Swan, M. 2013. The Potential Power of Personal Genomics in Reducing Social Stereotypes: Attitudinal Study and Computer Animation of Results for 4,000 Japanese Respondents. American Society of Human Genetics. Accepted.
23. Kohane, I.S.; Altman, R.B. 2005. Health-information altruists-a potentially critical resource. New England Journal of Medicine. 353(19):2074-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb051220 (Pubitemid 41609103)
24. Lewis, K.; Kaufman, J.; and Christakis, N. 2008. The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 79-100.
25. McGowan, M.L.; Fishman, J.R.; Lambrix, M.A. 2010. Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users. New Genet Soc. Sep 1;29(3):261-290.
26. McGuire, A.L.; Diaz, C.M.; Wang, T.; Hilsenbeck, S.G. 2009 Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Am J Bioeth. 9(6-7):3-10. doi: 10.1080/15265160902928209.
27. McKinney, M. 2013. HHS to develop data-sharing plan for outcomes research. ModernHealthcare.
28. Monegain, B. 2013. Data-sharing initiative reduces deaths. Healthcare IT News. March 19, 2013.
29. Phenx.org. 2014. https://phenx.org/
30. Portable Legal Consent. 2014. http://weconsent.us
31. Sanford Research. 2014. http://www.sanfordresearch.org/cords/
32. Swan, M. 2012. Crowdsourced Research Studies. J Med Internet Res. vol. 14, iss. 2, e46.
33. Swan, M. 2012a. Health 2050: The Realization of Personalized Medicine through Crowdsourcing, the Quantified Self, and the Participatory Biocitizen. J. Pers. Med. 2(3), 93-118; doi:10.3390/jpm2030093
34. Swan, M. 2013. The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery. Big Data. 1(2): 85-99.
35. TranSMART Foundation. 2014. http://www.transmartfoundation.org/
36. Trotter, F. 2012. Who owns patient data? Blog entry. O'Reilly Web site.
37. Tung, J.Y.; Eriksson, N.; Kiefer, A.K.; Macpherson, J.M.; Naughton, B.T.; Chowdry, A.B.; Do, C.B.; Hinds, D.A.; Wojcicki, A.; and Mountain, J.L. 2011. Characteristics of an Online Consumer Genetic Research Cohort. ASHG 2011 poster.
38. U.S. Census Bureau. 2012. Educational Attainment. http://www.census.gov/ hhes/socdemo/education/data/cps/2012/tables.html
39. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2013. States prepare for seamless exchange of health records after disasters: Ten state HIE programs have established infrastructure for secure exchange of health information.
40. Utz, S.; Kramer, N. 2009. The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2), article 1.
41. Viseu, A.; Clement, A.; and Aspinall, J. 2004. Situating privacy online: Complex perceptions and everyday practices. Information, Communication & Society, 7(1), 92-114.
42. Weitzman, E.R.; Kaci, L.; Mandl, K.D. 2010. Sharing medical data for health research: the early personal health record experience. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12(2):e14.
43. Weitzman, E.R.; Kelemen, S.; Kaci, L.; Mandl K.D. 2012. Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. May 22;12(1):39.