How low should we go? Understanding the perception of latency while inking

Proceedings - Graphics Interface

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 167-174

  Annett, Michelle ^a   Ng, Albert ^b   Dietz, Paul ^c   Bischof, Walter F ^a   Gupta, Anoop ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

^c MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Delay; Direct interaction; Indirect interaction; Just noticeable difference; Latency; Latency perception model; Pen; Perception; Psychophysics; Responsiveness; Stylus

Indexed keywords

DELAY; DIRECT INTERACTIONS; INDIRECT INTERACTIONS; JUST-NOTICEABLE DIFFERENCE; LATENCY; PEN; PERCEPTION MODELING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RESPONSIVENESS; STYLUS;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

EID: 84904790774     PISSN: 07135424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. B.D. Adelstein, D.R. Begault, M.R. Anderson, and E.M. Wenzel. Sensitivity to Haptic-Audio Asynchrony. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Multimodal Interfaces, 73-76, 2003.
2. D. Alamargot, D. Chesnet, C. Dansac, and C. Ros. Eye and Pen: A New Device for Studying Reading during Writing. Behaviour Research Methods, 38(2): 287-299, 2006.
3. M. Annett, F. Anderson, W.F. Bischof, and A. Gupta. The Pen is Mightier: Understanding Stylus Behaviour While Inking on Tablets. In Proc. of GI, 2014.
4. G. Anderson, R. Doherty, and S. Ganapathy. User Perception of Touch Screen Latency. Design, User Experience, and Usability Part 1, 195-202, 2011.
5. R. Coen-Calgi, P. Coraggio, P. Napoletano, O. Schwartz, M. Ferraro, and G. Boccignone. Visuomotor Characterization of Eye Movements in a Drawing Task. Vision Research, 49(8): 810-818, 2009.
6. S. Dahl and R. Bresin. Is the Player More Influenced by the Auditory than the Tactile Feedback from the Instrument? In Proc. of the COST-06 Workshop on Digital Audio Effects, 194-197, 2001.
7. DLP Discovery 4100 Development Kit. http://www.ti.com/lit/an/dlpa008/ dlpa008.pdf. Accessed July 2013.
8. M. Fayol, D. Alamargot, and V.W. Berninger. Translation of Thought to Written Text While Composing: Advancing Theory, Knowledge, Research Methods, Tools, and Application. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2012.
9. A. Freed, A. Chaudhary, and B. Davila. Operating System Latency Measurement and Analysis for Sound Synthesis and Processing Applications. In Proc. of Int. Computer Music Conf., 479-481, 1997.
10. E. Gowen and R.C. Miall. Eye-tracking Interactions in Tracing and Drawing Tasks. Human Movement Science, 25: 568-585, 2006. (Pubitemid 44550705)
11. rd Int. Conf. on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and South East Asia, 51-60, 2005.
12. A. Henzen, N. Ailenei, F. Van Reeth, G. Vansichem, R.W. Zehner, and K. Amundson. An Electronic Ink Low Latency Drawing Tablet. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 35(1): 1070-1073, 2004.
13. R. Jota, A. Ng, P. Dietz, and D. Wigdor. How Fast is Fast Enough? A Study of the Effects of Latency in Direct-Touch Pointing Tasks. In Proc. of CHI, 2291-2300, 2013.
14. J.C. Lee, P. Dietz, D. Maynes-Aminzade, R. Raskar, and S. Hudson. Automatic Projector Calibration with Embedded Light Sensors. In Proc. of UIST, 123-126, 2004.
15. I.S. MacKenzie and C. Ware. Lag as a Determinant of Human Performance in Interactive Systems. In Proc. of CHI, 488-493, 1993.
16. T. Maki-Patola. Musical Effects of Latency. Suomen Musiikintutkijoiden, 9: 82-85, 2005.
17. T. Maki-Patola and P. Hamalainen. Latency Tolerance for Gesture Controlled Continuous Sound Instrument without Tactile Feedback. In Proc. of Int. Computer Music Conf., 1-5, 2004.
18. N.A. McMillian and D.C. Creelman, Detection Theory: a User's Guide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
19. R.C. Miall, H. Imamizu, and S. Miyauchi. Activation of the Cerebellum in Co-Ordinated Eye and Hand Tracking Movements: An fMRI Study. Experimental Brain Research, 135: 22-33, 2000.
20. R.B. Miller. Response Time in Man-Computer Conversational Transactions. Fall Joint Computer Conference, 267-277, 1968.
21. M. Montag, S. Sullivan, S. Dickey, and C. Leider. A Low-Cost, Low-Latency Multi-Touch Table with Haptic Feedback for Musical Applications. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 8-13, 2011.
22. A. Ng and P. Dietz. The Need for Speed in Touch Systems. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 2013.
23. A. Ng, J. Lepinski, D. Wigdor, S. Sanders, and P. Dietz. Designing for Low-Latency Direct-Touch Input. In Proc. of UIST, 453-462, 2012.
24. A. Ng, M. Annett, P. Dietz, A. Gupta, and W.F. Bischof. In the Blink of an Eye: Investigating Latency Perception during Stylus Interaction. In Proceedings of CHI 2014.
25. A.A. Sawchuk, E. Chew, R. Zimmermann, C. Papadopoulos, and C. Kyriakakis. From Remote Media Immersion to Distributed Immersive performance. In Proc. of ACM SIGMM Workshop on Experiential Telepresence, 110-120, 2003.
26. S. Seow. Designing and Engineering Time: The Psychology of Time Perception in Software, Pearson Education, Boston, 2008.
27. M.M. Taylor, and C.D. Creelman. PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41: 782-787, 1967.
28. J. Tchalenko. Eye Movements in Drawing Simple Lines. Perception, 36: 1152-1167, 2007.
29. J. Tchalenko and R.C. Miall. Eye-hand Strategies in Copying Complex Lines. Cortex, 45:368-376, 2009.
30. N. Toyoda, R. Yamamoto, and T. Yubuta. Clarification of Transition Conditions for Eye Movement While Generating a Trajectory Using the Upper Limb. SI International, 106-111, 2011.
31. N. Toyoda, R. Yamamoto, and T. Yubuta. Eye Movement While Generating a Trajectory Using the Upper Limb. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 6: 1733-1744, 2012.
32. D. Vogel and R. Balakrishnan. Direct Pen Interaction with a Conventional Graphic User Interface. Human Computer Interaction, 25: 324-388, 2010.
33. A. Wald. Sequential Analysis, John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, 1947.
34. J. Wright and E. Brandt. System-Level MIDI Performance Testing. In Proc. of Int. Computer Music Conf., 318-331, 2001.