Sensitivity to haptic-audio asynchrony

ICMI'03: Fifth International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 73-76

  Adelstein, Bernard D ^a   Begault, Durand R ^a   Anderson, Mark R ^a   Wenzel, Elizabeth M ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Audio; Cross modal asynchrony; Haptic; Latency; Multi modal interfaces; Time delay; Virtual environments

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES; AUDIO SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INVARIANCE; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL); VIRTUAL REALITY;

AUDIO; CROSS-MODAL ASYNCHRONY; HAPTIC; LATENCY; MULTI-MODAL INTERFACES; TIME DELAY; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 4644348337     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/958444.958448     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Craig, J.C., and Baihua, X. Temporal order and tactile patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 1990, 22-34.
2. Doel, van den, K., and Pai, D. K. The sounds of physical shape. Presence, 7(4), 1998, 382-395.
3. DiFranco, D. E., Beauregard, G. L., and Srinivasan, M. A. The effect of auditory cues on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments. Proceedings, ASME Dyn. Syst. & Control. (Dallas, TX, 1997). Vol-DSC-61, 17-22.
4. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis, 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1962.
5. Fouad, H., Ballas, J.A., and Brock, D. An extensible toolkit for creating virtual sonic environments, Proceedings, International Conference on Auditory Displays, ICAD 2000 (Atlanta, GA, 2000).
6. Gescheider, G.A. Auditory and cutaneous temporal resolution of successive brief stimuli. J. Exp. Psych. 75(4), 1967, 570-572.
7. Hendrix, C.M., Cheng, P., and Durfee, W.K. Relative influence of sensory cues in a multi-modal virtual; environment. Proceedings, ASME Dyn. Syst. & Control. (Nashville, TN, 1999). Vol-DSC-67, 59-64.
8. Lederman, S.J., Klatzky, R.L., Morgan, T., and Hamilton, C. Integrated multimodal information about surface texture via a probe: relative contributions of haptic and touch-produced sound sources. Proceedings, Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (Orlando, FL, 2002), 97-104.
9. Lederman, S.J., Martin, A.M., Tong, C., and Klatzky, R.L. Relative performance using haptic and/or touch-produced auditory cues in a remote absolute texture identification task. Proceedings, Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (Los Angeles, CA, 2003), 151-158.
10. Levitin, D.J., MacLean, K., Mathews, M., Chu L, and Jensen, E. The perception of cross-modal simultaneity. Proceedings, Computing Anticipatory Systems (Liege, Belgium, 1999). AIP Conf. Proc. 517, 2000, 323-329.
11. Levitt, H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoustical Soc. of America, 49(2), 1970, 467-477.
12. Spence, C., and Driver, J. Cross-modal links in attention between audition, vision and touch: implications for interface design. Internat. J. Cognitive Ergonomics. 1(4), 1997, 351-373.
13. Van Doren, C.L., Gescheider, G.A., and Verillo, R.T. Vibrotactile temporal gap detection as a function of age. J. Acoustical Soc. of America, 87(5), 1990, 2201-2206.
14. Welch, R.B. Meaning, attention, and the unity assumption in the intersensory bias of spatial and temporal perceptions. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, and J. Musseler (Eds.), Cognitive Contributions to the Perception of Spatial and Temporal Events. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999, 371-387.
15. Welch, R.B, and Warren, D.H. Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psych. Bulletin, 88, 1980, 638-667.