Speakers' acceptance of real-time speech exchange indicates that we use auditory feedback to specify the meaning of what we say

Psychological Science

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1198-1205

  Lind, Andreas ^a   Hall, Lars ^a   Breidegard, Björn ^b   Balkenius, Christian ^a   Johansson, Petter ^a,c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY COGNITIVE SCIENCE   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Self monitoring; Sense of agency; Speech production; Voice manipulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMANTICS; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SWEDEN;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SWEDEN;

EID: 84904758199     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797614529797     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Badcock, J. C., & Hugdahl, K. (2012). Cognitive mechanisms of auditory verbal hallucinations in psychotic and non-psychotic groups. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 431-438. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.010
2. Blackmer, E. R., & Mitton, J. L. (1991). Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech. Cognition, 39, 173-194. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90052-6
3. Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 237-242. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01907-1
4. Burnett, T. A., Senner, J. E., & Larson, C. R. (1997). Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: A preliminary study. Journal of Voice, 11, 202-211. doi:10.1016/s0892- 1997(97)80079-3
5. Cahill, C., Silbersweig, D., & Frith, C. (1996). Psychotic experiences induced in deluded patients using distorted auditory feedback. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1, 201-211. doi:10.1080/135468096396505
6. Cai, S., Beal, D. S., Ghosh, S. S., Tiede, M. K., Guenther, F. H., & Perkell, J. S. (2012). Weak responses to auditory feedback perturbation during articulation in persons who stutter: Evidence for abnormal auditory-motor transformation. PLoS ONE, 7(7), Article e41830. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0041830
7. Chang, E. F., Niziolek, C. A., Knight, R. T., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. F. (2013). Human cortical sensorimotor network underlying feedback control of vocal pitch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 2653-2658. doi:10.1073/pnas.1216827110
8. David, N. (2012). New frontiers in the neuroscience of the sense of agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 161. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00161/full
9. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
10. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
11. Frith, C. D. (2013). Action, agency and responsibility. Neuropsychologia, 55, 137-142. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsy chologia.2013.09.007
12. Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14-21. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5
13. Haggard, P., & Clark, S. (2003). Intentional action: Conscious experience and neural prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 695-707. doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00052-7
14. Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Strandberg, T. (2012). Lifting the veil of morality: Choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey. PLoS ONE, 7(9), Article e45457. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0045457
15. Hall, L., Strandberg, T., Pärnamets, P., Lind, A., Tärning, B., & Johansson, P. (2013). How the polls can be both spot on and dead wrong: Using choice blindness to shift political attitudes and voter intentions. PLoS ONE, 8(4), Article e60554. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0060554
16. Heinks-Maldonado, T. H., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. F. (2006). Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production. NeuroReport, 17, 1375-1379. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000233102.43526.e9
17. Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 135-145. doi:10.1038/nrn3158
18. Hickok, G. (2014). The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 2-20. doi:10.1080/01690965. 2013.834370
19. Houde, J. F., & Jordan, M. I. (1998). Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science, 279, 1213-1216. doi:10.1126/science.279.5354.1213
20. Huettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 347-374. doi:10.1080/01690960903046926
21. Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310, 116-119. doi:10.1126/science.1111709
22. Johansson, P., Hall, L., Tärning, B., Sikström, S., & Chater, N. (2013). Choice blindness and preference change: You will like this paper better if you (believe you) chose to read it! Journal of Behavioural Decision Making. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/bdm.1807
23. Jones, J. J., & Munhall, K. G. (2000). Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1246-1251. doi:10.1121/1.1288414
24. Kühn, S., Brass, M., & Haggard, P. (2012). Feeling in control: Neural correlates of experience of agency. Cortex, 49, 1935-1942. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.002
25. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Lind, A., Hall, L., Breidegard, B., Balkenius, C., & Johansson, P. (2014). Auditory feedback of one's own voice is used for high-level, semantic monitoring: The "self-comprehension" hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 166. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00166/full
27. Linell, P. (1982). The concept of phonological form and the activities of speech production and speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 37-72.
28. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
29. Moore, J. W., & Fletcher, P. C. (2012). Sense of agency in health and disease: A review of cue integration approaches. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.010
30. Moore, J. W., Wegner, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2009). Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 1056-1064. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.05.004
31. Nozari, N., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2011). Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 1-33. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.05.001
32. Oomen, C. C. E., Postma, A., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2005). Speech monitoring in aphasia: Error detection and repair behaviour in a patient with Broca's aphasia. In R. J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 209-225). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
33. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 36, 329-392. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12001495
34. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97-131. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00090-1
35. Seyfeddinipur, M., Kita, S., & Indefrey, P. (2008). How speakers interrupt themselves in managing problems in speaking: Evidence from self-repairs. Cognition, 108, 837-842. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.004
36. Sugimori, E., Asai, T., & Tanno, Y. (2013). The potential link between sense of agency and output monitoring over speech. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 360-374. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.010
37. Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008). Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 219-239. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010
38. Wegner, D., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54, 1-13. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.7.480